Multi-Institutional Review From the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium of Minor Spinal Cord Dysraphism in the Setting of Anorectal Malformations: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Anorectal malformations (ARM) are associated with congenital anomalies of the spine, but the impact of a minor spinal cord dysraphism (mSCD) on fecal continence in the setting of ARM remains unclear. MATERIALS/METHODS: A retrospective review was performed utilizing data from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) registry. The patient cohort was reviewed for ARM type, mSCD screening/incidence/neurosurgical intervention and age-based BMP utilization. RESULTS: 987 patients with ARM were categorized into mild (38%), moderate (32%) or complex (19%). 694 (70%) had normal spinal (NS) status. 271 (27.5%) patients had mSCD. MRI alone (49%) was the most common screening test for mSCD. US screening had a positive predictive value of 86.3% and a negative predictive value of 67.1%. Surgical intervention rates for mSCD ranged between 13% and 77% at a median age of 0.6-5.2 years. 726 (73.6%) patients were prescribed BMP (74.4% NS, 77.5% mSCD). Laxatives were most utilized BMP in all groups <5yo. ≥5yo, enema utilization increased with ARM complexity independent of spine status (with or without neurosurgical intervention). Neurosurgical intervention did not affect BMP utilization at any age or with any ARM when mSCD was identified. CONCLUSIONS: MSCD influence on bowel function in the setting ARM remains unclear. No significant impact of mSCD was noted on ARM patient bowel management program utilization. Variability exists within PCPLC site with screening and intervention for mSCD in patients with ARM. Future studies with standardized care may be needed to elucidate the true impact of mSCD on long term patient outcomes in ARM patients. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Fecal continence disparities in patients with idiopathic constipation treated at referral institutions for pediatric colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Fecal continence is a concern for many patients with idiopathic constipation and can significantly impact quality of life. It is unknown whether racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities are seen in fecal continence within the idiopathic constipation population. We aimed to evaluate fecal continence and associated demographic characteristics in children with idiopathic constipation referred for surgical evaluation. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study of children with idiopathic constipation was performed at sites participating in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC). All patients >3y of age with idiopathic constipation diagnosis were included. The primary outcome was fecal continence, categorized as complete (no accidents ever), daytime (no accidents during the day), partial (occasional incontinence day/night), and none (incontinent). We evaluated for associations between fecal continence and race, sex, age, insurance status, and other patient-level factors, employing Kruskal-Wallis and trend tests. RESULTS: 458 patients with idiopathic constipation from 12 sites were included. The median age of diagnosis was 4.1 years. Only 25% of patients referred for surgical evaluation were completely continent. Age at the visit was significantly associated with fecal continence level (p = 0.002). In addition, patients with public and mixed public and private insurance had lower levels of continence (p<0.001). Patients with developmental delay were also more likely to have lower continence levels (p = 0.009) while diagnoses such as anxiety, ADD/ADHD, autism, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder were not associated. Approximately 30% of patients had an ACE operation (antegrade continence enema) at a median age of 9.2 years at operation. Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo ACE operation (p = 0.016) when compared to white patients. CONCLUSION: We observed data that suggest differences in fecal incontinence rates based on payor status. Further investigation is needed to characterize these potential areas of disparate care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The presence of a neurodiverse disorder is associated with increased use of antegrade enema therapy in children with severe constipation: A study from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC).

INTRODUCTION: Children with severe constipation and a neurodiverse disorder (Autism and/or developmental delay) represent a challenging bowel management group. Treatment outcomes with laxative or enema therapy remain limited and are often complicated by patient/caregiver compliance. We hypothesized that children with neurodiverse disorders and severe constipation would benefit from a bowel management program (BMP) that includes early use of antegrade enemas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children requiring BMP in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) registry with diagnosis of constipation and/or constipation with pseudo-incontinence were reviewed. Those with Hirschsprung disease and/or Anorectal Malformation were excluded. BMP needs in patients with a neurodiverse diagnosis were compared to those without to evaluate differences in BMP's. RESULTS: 372 patients requiring a BMP were identified. 95 patients (58 autism spectrum, 54 developmental delay) were neurodiverse, and 277 patients were not. Neurodiverse patients had a higher prevalence of enema therapy 62.1% (59/95) vs. 54.9% (152/273) and use of antegrade enema therapy 33.7% (32/95) vs. 21.2% (58/273), p = 0.126. Neurodiverse patients were older 37.9% (36/95) > 12 years vs. 23.1% (63/273), p = 0.001 and 47.6% (10/21) were changed from laxative to enema therapy over time. 80% (8/10) of those changed from laxatives to enemas used antegrade therapy. 67.3% (35/52) of neurodiverse patients followed over time were on enema therapy at the most recent visit with 80% (28/35) requiring antegrade therapy. CONCLUSION: A large portion of patients with a neurodiverse disorder who fail laxative therapy use antegrade enemas to achieve effective bowel management. Early consideration of an antegrade conduit may simplify treatment in this group of children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Multi-institutional review of bowel management strategies in children with anorectal malformations.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: To describe current bowel management program (BMP) strategies in anorectal malformation (ARM) patients based on patient-level predictors using data from a multi-institutional consortium. MATERIALS/METHODS: Patient bowel function and BMP were reviewed from Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) data. The PCPLC is comprised of multidisciplinary specialists researching colorectal and pelvic disorders. Seven US institutions submitted de-identified clinical data on ARM patients into a centralized patient registry. RESULTS: The primary ARM of 624 patients was categorized into Mild (45.2%), Moderate (40.4%) or Complex (14.2%) anomaly classifications. Patient-specific BMP were examined based on age and on the presence of spinal cord/sacral anomalies. 418 (67%) enrolled patients were prescribed BMP (<5 yo 56.4%; ≥5-<12 yo 86.7%; ≥12 81.5%). Constipation was the primary chief complaint (80.2%). Forty percent of patients on a BMP were toilet trained and approximately one-half (48.5%) reported daytime stool accidents. Secondary surgical interventions for antegrade continence enemas (ACE) were examined; 14.5% of patients employed ACE strategies and utilization increased with age and varied based on anatomic anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on BMP strategies for patients with ARM from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium. Individual patient characteristics are explored for their impact on bowel management strategy utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The association of the severity of anorectal malformations and intestinal malrotation.

INTRODUCTION: Intestinal malrotation is a known association of anorectal malformations (ARM). Exact incidence, prognosis and surgical implications related to ARM are unknown. The aim of this study was to identify relevant associations between ARM and the presence of malrotation. METHODS: Records of patients from two referral centers were retrospectively analyzed looking for malrotation associated to ARM and its management, as well as factors for functional prognosis. RESULTS: 40 patients out of 2572 with ARM (1.6%) were found to have malrotation. Females were more commonly affected, and severe malformations were more frequent (cloaca, covered cloacal exstrophy in females and rectoprostatic and rectobladder neck fistula in males). Factors significantly associated with malrotation included Müllerian or Wolffian duct anomalies (P<0.05), while fecal continence status, presence of constipation, and use of laxatives or enemas were not. Detecting and correcting malrotation early on or at the time of colostomy creation represented a protective factor against additional surgeries for bowel obstruction and volvulus (P<0.001). Removal of the appendix during malrotation treatment required constructing a neoappendicostomy using a cecal flap in 9 out of 14 patients needing antegrade enema administration. CONCLUSIONS: Malrotation presence in patients with ARM has the same frequency as in the general population, but it is more common in severe malformations. Surgeons treating these patients should address the malrotation at the time of colostomy opening if detected. The appendix should be preserved for potential future use as an appendicostomy for antegrade administration of enemas.

Optimizing value utilizing Toyota Kata methodology in a multidisciplinary clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Value in healthcare is measured in terms of patient outcomes achieved per dollar expended. Outcomes and cost must be measured at the patient level to optimize value. Multidisciplinary clinics have been shown to be effective in providing coordinated and comprehensive care with improved outcomes, yet tend to have higher cost than typical clinics. We sought to lower individual patient cost and optimize value in a pediatric multidisciplinary reconstructive pelvic medicine (RPM) clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RPM clinic is a multidisciplinary clinic that takes care of patients with anomalies of the pelvic organs. The specialties involved include Urology, General Surgery, Gynecology, and Gastroenterology/Motility. From May 2012 to November 2014 we performed time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) analysis by measuring provider time for each step in the patient flow. Using observed time and the estimated hourly cost of each of the providers we calculated the final cost at the individual patient level, targeting clinic preparation. We utilized Toyota Kata methodology to enhance operational efficiency in an effort to optimize value. Variables measured included cost, time to perform a task, number of patients seen in clinic, percent value-added time (VAT) to patients (face to face time) and family experience scores (FES). RESULTS: At the beginning of the study period, clinic costs were $619 per patient. We reduced conference time from 6 min/patient to 1 min per patient, physician preparation time from 8 min to 6 min and increased Medical Assistant (MA) preparation time from 9.5 min to 20 min, achieving a cost reduction of 41% to $366 per patient. Continued improvements further reduced the MA preparation time to 14 min and the MD preparation time to 5 min with a further cost reduction to $194 (69%) (Figure). During this study period, we increased the number of appointments per clinic. We demonstrated sustained improvement in FES with regards to the families overall experience with their providers. Value added time was increased from 60% to 78% but this was not significant. CONCLUSION: Time-based cost analysis effectively measures individualized patient cost. We achieved a 69% reduction in clinic preparation costs. Despite this reduction in costs, we were able to maintain VAT and sustain improvements in family experience. In caring for complex patients, lean management methodology enables optimization of value in a multidisciplinary clinic.

Association of anorectal malformation and intestinal malrotation.

BACKGROUND: Patients born with anorectal malformations (ARM) frequently have other congenital anomalies that are well-defined; however, limited data exist examining the relationship of ARM with malrotation. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective review was performed to examine all patients treated at a regional children's medical center with a diagnosis of ARM. Data were collected to identify malrotation, vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, tracheo-esophageal fistula, renal, radial, limb (VACTERL) anomalies, the type of ARM, operative procedures performed, and long-term bowel management. RESULTS: One hundred forty-six patients were identified. Upper gastrointestinal evaluation was performed in 21 patients (14.4%), while contrast enemas were performed in 22 patients (15.1%). Seven patients were found to have malrotation (4.8%) and 6/7 of these patients had 2 or more VACTERL anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ARM and 2 or more VACTERL anomalies should undergo screening for malrotation. Patients with intestinal malrotation, ARM, and poor potential for bowel control should have their appendix preserved during a Ladd's procedure.

Colocolonic intussusception in a four-yr-old with a heart transplant: a case report and review of the literature.

A rare case of a colocolonic intussusception in a pediatric cardiac transplant patient is reported along with a review of colocolonic intussusception in pediatric patients after organ transplantation. A four-yr-old girl with a history of heart transplantation shortly after birth presented with a 12-hour history of abdominal pain, vomiting, and bloody stools. Initial abdominal x-ray showed rectal edema. A rectal examination revealed a palpable intussusceptum that prompted a therapeutic contrast enema, which failed to reduce the intussusception. Surgical exploration was performed with reduction of the intussusception and resection of the terminal ileum and cecum. A pathologic lead point was not identified.

Clinical features and treatment outcome of intussusception in premature neonates.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Less than 1.3% of all cases of intussusception occur in term neonates. Intussusception in premature neonates (IPN) is exceedingly rare. Its rarity and difficulty to differentiate IPN from common neonatal diseases like necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) often delays its diagnosis. The authors set out to characterize diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of this rare condition. METHODS: The authors analyzed 2 new cases of IPN and 33 previously reported cases from the literature. RESULTS: The 35 patients with IPN had an average gestational age, postconceptual age at diagnosis, and birth weight of 28.4 +/- 0.6 weeks (all data, mean +/- SEM), 31.1 +/- 0.5 weeks, and 1,165 +/- 21 g, respectively. Gastrointestinal symptoms first presented at age 8 +/- 1 days. A preoperative diagnosis of NEC was assumed in 24 patients, delaying diagnosis by 10 +/- 2 days. Intussusception was diagnosed radiographically in 2 patients (1 contrast enema and 1 ultrasound scan) and during surgery or autopsy in the remainder. Resection was reported in 28 patients for bowel that was irreducible, necrotic, or perforated. The overall mortality rate was 20%, mainly owing to sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Intussusception in the premature neonate often is misdiagnosed as NEC, delaying operative intervention. Contrast enema has limited diagnostic capability. Early diagnosis may be achieved with use of ultrasound scan. Intussusception can be treated successfully with resection and primary anastomosis, achieving good results.