Cardiac arrest in the perioperative period: a consensus guideline for identification, treatment, and prevention from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac arrest in the operating room is a rare but potentially life-threatening event with mortality rates of more than 50%. Contributing factors are often known, and the event is recognised rapidly as patients are usually under full monitoring. This guideline covers the perioperative period and is complementary to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery jointly nominated a panel of experts to develop guidelines for the recognition, treatment, and prevention of cardiac arrest in the perioperative period. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All searches were restricted to publications from 1980 to 2019 inclusive and to the English, French, Italian and Spanish languages. The authors also contributed individual, independent literature searches. RESULTS: This guideline contains background information and recommendation for the treatment of cardiac arrest in the operating room environment, and addresses controversial topics such as open chest cardiac massage, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion and resuscitative thoracotomy, pericardiocentesis, needle decompression, and thoracostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Successful prevention and management of cardiac arrest during anaesthesia and surgery requires anticipation, early recognition, and a clear treatment plan. The ready availability of expert staff and equipment must also be taken into consideration. Success not only depends on medical knowledge, technical skills and a well-organised team using crew resource management, but also on an institutional safety culture embedded in everyday practice through continuous education, training, and multidisciplinary co-operation.

Cardiac arrest in the perioperative period: a consensus guideline for identification, treatment, and prevention from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac arrest in the operating room is a rare but potentially life-threatening event with mortality rates of more than 50%. Contributing factors are often known, and the event is recognised rapidly as patients are usually under full monitoring. This guideline covers the perioperative period and is complementary to the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery jointly nominated a panel of experts to develop guidelines for the recognition, treatment and prevention of cardiac arrest in the perioperative period. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All searches were restricted to publications from 1980 to 2019 inclusive and to the English, French, Italian and Spanish languages. The authors also contributed individual, independent literature searches. RESULTS: This guideline contains background information and recommendation for the treatment of cardiac arrest in the operating room environment, and addresses controversial topics such as open chest cardiac massage (OCCM), resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion (REBOA) and resuscitative thoracotomy, pericardiocentesis, needle decompression and thoracostomy. CONCLUSION: Successful prevention and management of cardiac arrest during anaesthesia and surgery requires anticipation, early recognition and a clear treatment plan. The ready availability of expert staff and equipment must also be taken into consideration. Success not only depends on medical knowledge, technical skills and a well organised team using crew resource management but also on an institutional safety culture embedded in everyday practice through continuous education, training and multidisciplinary co-operation.

Key summary of German national treatment guidance for hospitalized COVID-19 patients : Key pharmacologic recommendations from a national German living guideline using an Evidence to Decision Framework (last updated 17.05.2021).

PURPOSE: This executive summary of a national living guideline aims to provide rapid evidence based recommendations on the role of drug interventions in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: The guideline makes use of a systematic assessment and decision process using an evidence to decision framework (GRADE) as recommended standard WHO (2021). Recommendations are consented by an interdisciplinary panel. Evidence analysis and interpretation is supported by the CEOsys project providing extensive literature searches and living (meta-) analyses. For this executive summary, selected key recommendations on drug therapy are presented including the quality of the evidence and rationale for the level of recommendation. RESULTS: The guideline contains 11 key recommendations for COVID-19 drug therapy, eight of which are based on systematic review and/or meta-analysis, while three recommendations represent consensus expert opinion. Based on current evidence, the panel makes strong recommendations for corticosteroids (WHO scale 5-9) and prophylactic anticoagulation (all hospitalized patients with COVID-19) as standard of care. Intensified anticoagulation may be considered for patients with additional risk factors for venous thromboembolisms (VTE) and a low bleeding risk. The IL-6 antagonist tocilizumab may be added in case of high supplemental oxygen requirement and progressive disease (WHO scale 5-6). Treatment with nMABs may be considered for selected inpatients with an early SARS-CoV-2 infection that are not hospitalized for COVID-19. Convalescent plasma, azithromycin, ivermectin or vitamin D3 should not be used in COVID-19 routine care. CONCLUSION: For COVID-19 drug therapy, there are several options that are sufficiently supported by evidence. The living guidance will be updated as new evidence emerges.

2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the third annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the role of cardiac arrest centers and dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children, vasopressors in adults, advanced airway interventions in adults and children, targeted temperature management in children after cardiac arrest, initial oxygen concentration during resuscitation of newborns, and interventions for presyncope by first aid providers. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of the evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence to Decision Framework Highlights sections. The task forces also listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

[Postresuscitation care: therapeutic concepts and prognostication]. / Postreanimationstherapie: Therapiekonzepte und Prognosestellung.

After cardiac arrest, mortality in the postresuscitation period is still up to 70%. Therefore, optimal intensive care of these patients is of great importance. This article summarizes current knowledge and recommendations for postresuscitation care. Particular focus is given to mild therapeutic hypothermia. This is currently the only therapeutic concept for which randomized clinical trials have shown improved survival and neurological outcome after cardiac arrest.

Evaluation of a tape removal test to assess neurological deficit after cardiac arrest in rats.

BACKGROUND: In animal models of cardiocirculatory arrest (CA) it is of major interest to establish tests that can assess neurological damage after global cerebral ischaemia following CA. We evaluated a tape removal test with regard to detection of sensorimotor deficit, comparing it to the Neurological Deficit Score (NDS) in an established model of global cerebral ischaemia after CA in rats. METHODS: Rats were subjected to either 6 min of CA followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or a sham operation. At 1, 3 and 7 days from the intervention, two different neurological tests were applied to all animals: in the tape removal test, the time was measured from attachment of adhesive tapes to the front paws until the animals removed them using their teeth and compared to latencies in the sham group. The NDS assessed two parameters ("travel beam" and "stop at the edge of a table"). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare tests. RESULTS: In the tape removal test, all animals of the CPR group showed a clear neurological deficit throughout the observation period with a marked recovery until day 7 (pre-CA: 4s, 1 day: 180 s, 3 days: 165 s, 7 days: 44 s; data are median values). Latencies differed significantly from those of sham-operated animals (1 day: P<0.001, 3 days: P=0.003, 7 days: P=0.006). ROC analysis showed that the tape removal test but not the NDS was appropriate for detecting neurological damage 3 and 7 days after restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Histological examination confirmed neuronal damage to the hippocampus, cortex, thalamus and striatum. CONCLUSION: In the present study, a clinically relevant sensorimotor deficit after global cerebral ischaemia following cardiac arrest in rats has been quantified for the first time by using a tape removal test. The tape removal test is a sensitive method that can be easily applied to test large numbers of animals in future studies.

Newer approaches to the pharmacological management of heart failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of acute heart failure is gaining importance, specifically in the perioperative setting. Increasing evidence shows that established forms of therapy using beta-adrenergic inotropic drugs have no effect on long-term survival; thus, anesthetists and intensive care specialists are focusing on new strategies. This review examines, with respect to the literature of the past year, whether these strategies will gain significance in the perioperative setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Owing to its unique efficacy profile, levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer, improves long-term survival in patients with acute heart failure and has been incorporated into the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Improved heart function without increased oxygen consumption, anti-ischemic effects, no arrhythmogenic effect and positive effects on intestinal perfusion have been described. Despite the positive effects on hemodynamics and symptoms, tezosentan, an endothelin antagonist, did not improve outcome, perhaps due to too high dosages of the drug. Nesiritide, a recombinant brain natriuretic peptide, may represent an alternative to nitroglycerin and dobutamine and possibly have a benefit for survival. No final conclusions can yet be drawn, however. L-NAME, a nitric oxide synthase antagonist, represents a promising new approach for the treatment of cardiogenic shock. The results must be confirmed in large, randomized studies. SUMMARY: For perioperative treatment of acute heart failure, levosimendan, nesiritide and L-NAME constitute promising alternatives to conventional inotropic and vasodilatory drugs. The strongest evidence for improving outcome is given for levosimendan. According to the present literature, tezosentan does not currently have any significance for treatment of perioperative heart failure.

Effects of intracerebroventricular application of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on cerebral recovery after cardiac arrest in rats.

SUBJECT: After transient global cerebral ischemia, selective vulnerable brain areas show delayed neurodegeneration with characteristics of apoptosis. Recent data demonstrate potent neuroprotective effects of the application of endogenous growth hormones such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) after focal cerebral ischemia. To assess possible effects of the intracerebroventricular application of BDNF on cerebral recovery after global cerebral ischemia due to cardiac arrest in rats, various selective vulnerable brain areas were investigated. INTERVENTIONS: Global cerebral ischemia was initiated by ventricular fibrillation in rats under general anesthesia. After 6 mins, the animals were resuscitated by external cardiac massage combined with defibrillation and divided into two groups (BDNF vs. placebo). BDNF or placebo (1 microg/hr) was applied continuously during the complete reperfusion time using an implanted osmotic minipump. After 6 hrs, 24 hrs, 3 days, and 7 days (n = 6-7 per group), coronal brain sections were analyzed by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated d-uracil triphosphate-biotin nick end-labeling (TUNEL) and Nissl staining and a caspase activity assay in the hippocampal cornu ammonis 1 sector, the nucleus reticularis thalami, and the striatum. At 24 hrs, 3 days, and 7 days, animals were tested according to a neurologic deficit score. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In all groups, typical delayed neurodegeneration was observed in selective vulnerable brain areas. Neuroscore, TUNEL, and Nissl staining revealed no relevant differences between the groups (BDNF vs. placebo) with regard to neurologic recovery and the number of viable (after 7 days in cornu ammonis 1 sector: BDNF, 110 +/- 32; placebo, 142 +/- 53) and TUNEL-positive neurons (after 7 days in cornu ammonis 1 sector: BDNF, 360 +/- 81; placebo, 253 +/- 62) during the different time points. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the well-known neuroprotective properties of BDNF in ischemic-induced neuronal degeneration, the present study did not reveal any beneficial effects regarding neurologic recovery and neurohistopathologic outcome after global cerebral ischemia in rats. Future investigations should focus on intracellular signaling cascades activated by BDNF after global cerebral ischemia.