A comparison of patient treatment pathways among multidrug-resistant and drug-sensitive TB cases in Delhi, India: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The delay in the diagnosis and treatment initiation of patients with MDR-TB worsens individual prognosis and increases the risk of disease transmission in the community. These delays have been attributed to delay in treatment-seeking by the patient and shifting to multiple healthcare facilities before being tested and diagnosed through India's National Tuberculosis Elimination Program (NTEP). OBJECTIVE: to identify treatment pathways in patients with MDR-TB from the time of onset of symptoms and treatment seeking until diagnosis at a PMDT site and subsequent treatment initiation. We also compared these characteristics with those of patients with DS-TB. METHODS: We recruited a total of 168 patients with MDR-TB and DS-TB each, in Delhi. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Version 25. RESULTS: The mean (SD) patient delay for initial treatment-seeking was 20.9 (15.9) days in patients with MDR-TB, and 16.1 (17.1) days in patients with DS-TB (p < 0.001). The median time from visit to the first healthcare facility (HCF) until confirmation of MDR-TB diagnosis was 78.5 days, and until treatment initiation was 102.5 days. Among patients with DS-TB, the time interval from a visit to the first HCF until the initiation of ATT-DOTS was 61.5 days.. Patients diagnosed with DS-TB, whose first source of treatment was a private facility (n = 49), reported a significant delay in the initiation of ATT-DOTS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the introduction of universal drug sensitivity testing in individuals having presumptive MDR-TB, a significant delay in the diagnosis and initiation of effective MDR-TB treatment persists as a major public health challenge in India.

Accelerating TB notification from the private health sector in Delhi, India.

INTRODUCTION: In India, almost half of all patients with tuberculosis (TB) seek care in the private sector as the first point of care. The national programme is unable to support such TB patients and facilitate effective treatment, as there is no information on TB and Multi or Extensively Drug Resistant TB (M/XDR-TB) diagnosis and treatment in private sector. OBJECTIVE: To improve this situation, Government of India declared TB a notifiable disease for establishing TB surveillance system, to extend supportive mechanism for TB treatment adherence and standardised practices in the private sector. But TB notification from the private sector is a challenge and still a lot needs to be done to accelerate TB notification. METHODS: Delhi State TB Control Programme had taken initiatives for improving notification of TB cases from the private sector in 2014. Key steps taken were to constitute a state level TB notification committee to oversee the progress of TB notification efforts in the state and direct 'one to one' sensitisation of private practitioners (PPs) (in single PP's clinic, corporate hospitals and laboratories) by the state notification teams with the help of available tools for sensitising the PP on TB notification - TB Notification Government Order, Guidance Tool for TB Notification and Standards of TB Care in India. RESULTS: As a result of focussed state level interventions, without much external support, there was an accelerated notification of TB cases from the private sector. TB notification cases from the private sector rose from 341 (in 2013) to 4049 (by the end of March 2015). CONCLUSION: Active state level initiatives have led to increase in TB case notification.