The Effect of a Thixotropic Nasal Gel on Nasal Symptoms and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Drug-free viscous nasal applications have been shown to reduce nasal symptoms in individuals with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Nascum®-Plus (NP), a commercially available thixotropic gel, has been designed to reduce dryness and soreness of the nasal mucosa and prevent the absorption of small particles. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of single-dose NP in treating nasal symptoms and secretion during challenge in an allergen challenge chamber (ACC). Furthermore, the effect of this treatment on biomarkers and immune cells of the allergic cascade were measured. METHODS: This open-label, cross-over, sequence-randomized, monocentric trial randomized 18 adults with SAR and a positive skin prick test reaction to Dactylis glomerata pollen to receive NP or no treatment during two 4-h ACC sessions 3 weeks apart. On Day 1, 9 subjects were challenged for 4 h with treatment, the other 9 without treatment, and vice versa on Day 22. Nasal lavage fluid and nasal filter eluate samples were obtained pre, 2, and 18 h post challenge in the ACC. RESULTS: NP significantly reduced nasal symptoms, assessed by total nasal symptom score (p < 0.001), and minimized nasal secretion (p = 0.047), while no significant effect on biomarkers and immune cells in the nasal fluid was observed. The treatment was safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The physical barrier built by NP nasal gel can be safely applied in patients with allergic rhinitis. It reduces allergic nasal symptoms and secretion, but application of a single dose does not affect local inflammatory biomarkers.

Specificity and reproducibility of nasal biomarkers in patients with allergic rhinitis after allergen challenge chamber exposure.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is an inflammatory disease that causes cellular influx and mediator release in the nose. These inflammatory changes might be used as nasal biomarkers to assess the efficacy of novel anti-allergic treatments. OBJECTIVE: To assess the specificity and reproducibility of nasal biomarkers in patients with allergic rhinitis after grass pollen exposure in an allergen challenge chamber. METHODS: In a monocenter pilot study, 15 patients with allergic rhinitis and 19 healthy individuals underwent two 4-hour Dactylis glomerate pollen challenges in the challenge chamber with an interval of 21 days. Before challenge, on exit, and after 2 and 22 hours, a nasal lavage was performed and nasal secretions were collected on filter paper to determine a wide panel of cells and mediators. Furthermore, total nasal symptom score, nasal flow, and nasal nitric oxide were measured. RESULTS: Pollen exposure significantly increased eosinophil, interleukin (IL) 5, IL-6, IL-13, and macrophage inflammatory protein 1ß levels in allergic patients but not in healthy individuals. The effect could be reproduced for eosinophils, IL-5, IL-6, and macrophage inflammatory protein 1ß after the second allergen challenge. By contrast, the IL-13 levels were higher and eotaxin levels first increased after repetitive allergen challenge. There was no correlation between total nasal symptom score and elevated cell or cytokine levels. Nasal nitric oxide levels were nonspecifically elevated in both patients with allergy and healthy controls. CONCLUSION: A subset of cellular and soluble biomarkers in nasal lavage and secretion reveals specificity and reproducibility in patients with allergic rhinitis. These can be used to measure the immunologic efficacy of antiallergic treatments in an allergen challenge chamber. Carryover effects attributable to priming must be considered when designing cross-over studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00297843.

Efficacy and safety of a novel nasal steroid, S0597, in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) poses a significant global burden with increasing prevalence. Although intranasal glucocorticosteroids are effective, older agents can have limiting side effects. S0597, a novel intranasal glucocorticosteroid, has demonstrated good safety and tolerability during preclinical and phase 1 studies. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of different doses of S0597 nasal spray vs placebo in patients with seasonal AR. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center study randomized 159 patients 18 to 65 years old (mean age 37.8 years) with a positive skin prick test reaction for Dactylis glomerata to receive S0597 at 200, 400, or 800 µg/d or placebo for 15 days. On days 1 (baseline), 15, and 16, patients underwent a 4-hour pollen challenge to evaluate treatment efficacy measured by the change in total nasal symptom score (TNSS) from baseline to days 15 and 16 and changes in TNSS subscales and nasal secretion. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in TNSS from baseline to days 15 and 16 were observed with all S0597 doses vs placebo (P = .0005 overall), with the greatest improvements observed in the highest-dose group (P < .0001). Significant decreases were observed in each S0597 dose group vs placebo for TNSS subscales and nasal secretion. Improvements in nasal secretion were related to dose, with the greatest decreases from baseline in the 800-µg/d group on days 15 and 16 (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with S0597 at 200, 400, and 800 µg/d by 2 divided doses for 2 weeks was safe and significantly more effective than placebo for improving nasal symptoms associated with grass pollen-induced seasonal AR in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01614691.

Exacerbation of atopic dermatitis on grass pollen exposure in an environmental challenge chamber.

BACKGROUND: It has frequently been speculated that pruritus and skin lesions develop after topical exposure to aeroallergens in sensitized patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVE: We sought to study cutaneous reactions to grass pollen in adult patients with AD with accompanying clear IgE sensitization to grass allergen in an environmental challenge chamber using a monocenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design. METHODS: Subjects were challenged on 2 consecutive days with either 4000 pollen grains/m(3) of Dactylis glomerata pollen or clean air. The severity of AD was assessed at each study visit up to 5 days after challenge by (objective) scoring of AD (SCORAD). Additionally, air-exposed and non-air-exposed skin areas were each scored using local SCORAD scoring and investigator global assessments. Levels of a series of serum cytokines and chemokines were determined by using a Luminex-based immunoassay. The primary end point of the study was the change in objective SCORAD scores between prechallenge and postchallenge values. RESULTS: Exposure to grass pollen induced a significant worsening of AD. A pronounced eczema flare-up of air-exposed rather than covered skin areas occurred. In grass pollen-exposed subjects a significantly higher increase in CCL17, CCL22, and IL-4 serum levels was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that controlled exposure to airborne allergens of patients with a so-called extrinsic IgE-mediated form of AD induced a worsening of cutaneous symptoms.

Efficacy of the oral chemoattractant receptor homologous molecule on TH2 cells antagonist BI 671800 in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: The inflammatory response in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is partly mediated by the prostaglandin D2 receptor chemoattractant receptor homologous molecule on T(H)2 cells (CRTH2). OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of the oral CRTH2 antagonist BI 671800 (50, 200, and 400 mg twice daily), fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 µg once daily), or oral montelukast (10 mg once daily) administered for 2 weeks in patients with SAR. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, partial-crossover study, participants aged 18 to 65 years with a positive skin prick test to Dactylis glomerata pollen were exposed to out-of-season allergen in the environmental challenge chamber for 6 hours. The primary efficacy variable was the total nasal symptom score assessed as the area under the curve (AUC)(0-6h). RESULTS: In total, 146 patients (63.7% male; mean age, 36.1 years) were randomized. The adjusted mean total nasal symptom score AUC(0-6h) was significantly reduced versus placebo with 200 mg of BI 671800 (absolute difference, -0.85; percentage difference, -17%; P = .0026), montelukast (absolute difference, -0.74; percentage difference, -15%; P = .0115), and fluticasone propionate (absolute difference, -1.64; percentage difference, -33%; P < .0001). Compared with placebo, BI 671800 significantly reduced nasal eosinophil values (P < .05 for all doses), significantly inhibited nasal inflammatory cytokine levels (IL-4 and eotaxin, P < .05; 200 mg twice daily), and induced a dose-related reduction in ex vivo prostaglandin D2-mediated eosinophil shape change. CONCLUSION: Two hundred milligrams of BI 671800 twice daily demonstrated efficacy in treating SAR symptoms induced by environmental challenge chamber allergen exposure and had a favorable safety profile.

Pollen starch granules in bronchial inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Pollen grains with a diameter of more than 10 µm preferentially deposit in the upper airways. Their contribution to lower airway inflammation is unclear. One hypothesis is that lower airway inflammation is mainly caused by allergen containing pollen starch granules, which are released from the pollen grains and can easily enter the peripheral airways because of their smaller size. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differential effect of pollen grains and pollen starch granules on nasal symptoms and lower airway inflammation. METHODS: In a 2-period crossover design, 30 patients with allergic rhinitis and mild intermittent asthma underwent 2 allergen challenges on consecutive days in an environmental challenge chamber with either a mixture of pollen grains plus starch granules or starch granules only. End points were the total nasal symptom score (TNSS), nasal secretion weight, nasal flow, spirometry, and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO). RESULTS: The presence of pollen grains had a significant and considerable effect on increase in TNSS and secretion weight and on decrease in nasal flow. Starch granules alone only had minimal effects on nasal symptoms. Challenges with starch granules significantly increased eNO. Pollen had no effect on eNO. CONCLUSION: Pollen grains cause nasal symptoms but do not augment lower airway inflammation, whereas starch granules trigger lower airway inflammation but hardly induce nasal symptoms.

Anti-allergic drug testing in an environmental challenge chamber is suitable both in and out of the relevant pollen season.

BACKGROUND: An environmental challenge chamber (ECC) is a useful tool to expose allergic patients to relevant allergens in a controlled indoor setting and to test anti-allergic treatment. Hitherto, ECC studies with grass pollen are conducted primarily outside of the pollen season to avoid the influence of natural pollen exposure. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an established anti-allergic treatment, a combination of cetirizine (CET) and pseudoephedrine (PSE), shows an equivalent treatment effect within and outside of the grass pollen season when tested in an ECC. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, four-way crossover study, the effect of a combination of 10 mg CET and 120 mg PSE compared with placebo on nasal symptoms, nasal flow, and nasal secretion was investigated in 70 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Subjects underwent four 6-hour pollen challenges in an ECC with administration of the drugs after 2 hours. Two challenges were conducted within the grass pollen season and two out of the grass pollen season. RESULTS: The active treatment significantly improved nasal symptoms and nasal flow and significantly reduced the amount of nasal secretion compared with placebo both within and outside of the pollen season (P < .0001 each). The treatment effect was not different between the seasons (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Controlled allergen provocation in an ECC can be used to test anti-allergic treatment both within and outside of the grass pollen season.