Transurethral resection versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A prospective randomized trial comparing perioperative thrombin generation and fibrinolysis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) focusing on perioperative thrombin generation and fibrinolysis. METHODS: Sixty-five BPH patients were prospectively randomly assigned to undergo TURP (n = 32) or HoLEP (n = 33). The prothrombin fragment (PF) 1+2, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) were measured preoperatively, at the 1st day and 3rd day after surgery. RESULTS: PF1+2, TAT, t-PA, and PAI-1 significantly elevated at day 1 and day 3 after surgery (P < .05) and remarkedly decreased from the 1st day to the 3rd day (P < .05). The levels of PF1+2 and TAT were higher in TURP group postoperatively than that in HoLEP group (P < .05). There is no significant difference between 2 groups in regard of t-PA and PAI-1 (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The activation of thrombin generation and fibrinolysis system were noticed in BPH patients after TURP or HoLEP. TURP may associate with a higher hypercoagulable thrombotic risk than HoLEP.

[Transurethral resection of the prostate versus transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia with bladder detrusor overactivity].

OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the effects of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with bladder detrusor overactivity. METHODS: his study included 51 cases of BPH with bladder detrusor overactivity treated by TURP and another 58 treated by HoLEP. We evaluated the urination of the two groups of patients during the recovery period and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in such baseline data as the blood PSA level, prostate volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality of life (QOL) between the two groups of patients, except in effective bladder capacity, which was higher in the TURP than in the HoLEP group (ï¼»315±59ï¼½ vs ï¼»287±76ï¼½ ml, P<0.05). Urine storage symptoms were obviously improved in both of the groups postoperatively, with the storage symptoms score significantly decreased from 12.6±4.9 preoperatively to 7.5±3.9 at 3 months and 6.1±4.2 at 6 months after surgery in the TURP group (P<0.01) and from 13.7±5.7 to 7.9±4.2 and 7.0±5.1 in the HoLEP group (P<0.01). HoLEP manifested significant advantages over TURP in the postoperative urethral catheterization time (ï¼»2.7±0.8ï¼½ vs ï¼»5.1±1.2ï¼½ d, P<0.05), postoperative bladder contracture time (ï¼»4.1±1.9ï¼½ vs ï¼»5.8±2.4ï¼½ d, P<0.05), postoperative hospital stay (ï¼»4.4±1.8ï¼½ vs ï¼»5.9±2.5ï¼½ d, P<0.05), and improvement of the maximum urinary flow rate, which was increased from (7.9±3.7) ml/s preoperatively to (16.8±4.3) ml/s at 3 months after surgery in the HoLEP group and from (8.6±3.2) ml/s to (14.6±4.3) ml/s in the TURP group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both TURP and HoLEP can improve bladder function and detrusor overactivity in BPH patients, with similar effects in improving urination at 3 to 6 months after surgery. However, HoLEP has more advantages over TURP during the period of postoperative recovery.