Benefit and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol in the Salford Lung Study in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (SLS COPD) according to baseline patient characteristics and treatment subgroups.

BACKGROUND: SLS COPD was the first open-label randomised controlled trial demonstrating a reduction in moderate/severe COPD exacerbations with once-daily inhaled fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) in everyday clinical practice. Here we report FF/VI effectiveness and safety in predefined patient subgroups. METHODS: Patients with COPD, exacerbation history, and receiving maintenance inhaler therapy, were randomised to initiate FF/VI 100/25 µg or continue usual care (UC) with 12 months' follow-up. Annual rates of moderate/severe exacerbations (primary outcome), selected secondary outcomes, and incidence of pneumonia serious adverse events of special interest (SAESI) were compared between randomisation groups across various patient subgroups/baseline treatment strata. SAESI rates by actual treatment were also assessed. RESULTS: Lower exacerbation rates were observed for FF/VI versus UC across all subgroups/strata, including ICS + LABA therapy subset (8.0% [0.1, 15.4]), except in patients without baseline airflow limitation (-0.5% [-29.8, 22.1]). Larger reductions compared to the overall analysis were observed for patients on ICS-containing regimens (excluding LAMA) before the study (15.6% [3.4, 26.3]), and with baseline CAT score <10 (25.3% [-0.4, 44.4]). Pneumonia SAESI rates were similar for FF/VI versus UC across all subgroups/strata, except the LABA, LAMA or LABA + LAMA stratum (incidence ratio 2.8 [0.9, 8.5]). SAESI rates were not increased for FF/VI versus other ICS + LABA. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating FF/VI versus continuing UC reduced exacerbation rates without increased pneumonia SAESI risk compared to other ICS-containing regimens and in various patient subgroups, consistent with primary study findings. FF/VI may be a therapeutic option for a broad population of COPD patients, including those with more severe disease.

Development of an integrated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease service model in an inner-city region in the UK: initial findings and 12-month results.

AIMS: To improve the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Salford, UK, and to evaluate the impact of an integrated service model after one year. METHODS: A health needs analysis and benchmarking exercise was undertaken in 2007. These activities were used to develop an integrated service model in order to improve the diagnosis and management of COPD and reduce unscheduled hospital admissions and length of stay. RESULTS: Following implementation of the model, 811 further patients were diagnosed. Unscheduled hospital admissions for COPD fell from 935 to 840, length of stay was reduced from 8.3 to 7.7 days, and associated costs fell from £1,772, 865 to £1,528,080. The number of patients who completed pulmonary rehabilitation increased from 84 to 143. CONCLUSIONS: An integrated COPD service model was successful in increasing diagnosis, reducing hospital admissions and reducing length of hospital stay - in line with the proposed National Strategy for COPD Services in England. It also promoted management according to National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines.

Cost analysis of an integrated care model in the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Home treatment models for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) proved to be a safe alternative to hospitalization. These models have the potential to free up resources; however, in the United Kingdom, it remains unclear to whether they provide cost savings compared with hospital treatment. Over a 12-month period from August 2003, 130 patients were selected for the integrated care group (total admissions with AECOPD = 546). These patients were compared with 95 retrospective controls in the hospital treatment group. Controls were selected from admissions during the previous 12 months (total of 662 admissions) to match the integrated care group in age, sex, and postal code. Resource use data were collected for both groups and compared using National Health Service (NHS) perspective for cost minimization analysis. In the integrated care group (130 patients), 107 (82%) patients received home support with average length of stay 3.3 (SD 3.9) days compared with 10.4 (SD 7.7) in the hospital group (95 patients). Average number of visits per patients in the integrated care group was 3.08 (SD = 0.95; 95% CI = 2.9-3.2). Cost per patient in the integrated care group was pound1653 (95% CI, pound1521-1802) compared with pound2256 (95% CI, pound2126- 2407) in the hospital group. The integrated care group resulted in cost saving of approximately pound600 (P < 0.001) per patient. This integrated care model for the management of patients with AECOPD offered cost savings of pound600 per patient over the conventional hospital treatment model using the new NHS tariff from an acute trust provider perspective.