ZFTA (Zinc Finger Translocation Associated) Fusion in Supratentorial Ependymomas: Low Prevalence in South Asians and No Correlation with Survival.

BACKGROUND: Supratentorial ependymomas (STEs) are an aggressive group of ependymomas, topographically distinct from their posterior fossa and spinal counterparts. Zinc finger translocation associated (ZFTA) fusion-positive cases have been reported to account for the majority of STEs, although data on its association with poorer outcomes are inconsistent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed the prevalence of the ZFTA fusion by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence in situ hybridization in a cohort of 61 patients (68 samples) with STE. Our primary outcome was to determine the role of the ZFTA fusion on progression-free and overall survival of patients with STE. Our secondary objectives were to assess the impact of ZFTA fusion on nuclear factor (NF)-kB pathway signaling via surrogate markers of this pathway, namely COX-2, CCND1, and L1 cell adhesion molecule. RESULTS: ZFTA fusion was noted in 21.3% of STEs in our cohort. The presence of this rearrangement did not significantly impact the progression-free or overall survival of patients with STEs and was not associated with upregulation of markers of the NF-kB pathway. Only gross total resection was significantly associated with better progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: In contradiction to previous reports from across the world, the ZFTA fusion is far less prevalent among our population. It does not appear to drive NF-kB signaling or significantly affect outcomes. Gross total resection must be attempted in all cases of STE and adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy employed when gross total resection is not achieved.

Comparison between Surgical and Endovascular Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Interventions and Associated Costs.

PURPOSE: To compare: (i) rate of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) interventions in both incident and prevalent end-stage kidney disease patients; (ii) their associated costs; and (iii) intervention-free survival between patients with surgical hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula (SAVF) versus those with an endovascularly created fistula (endoAVF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) were abstracted to determine the rate of AVF interventions performed in the first year and associated costs (based on Medicare payment rates) for SAVFs created from 2011 to 2013 in the incident and prevalent patient cohorts. Comparative data for endoAVF were obtained from the Novel Endovascular Access Trial (NEAT). Event rates, intervention-free survival, and costs were compared between endoAVF and SAVF cohorts after 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching. RESULTS: In the matched incident patients, the event rate was 0.74 per patient-year (PY) for endoAVF versus 7.22/PY for SAVF (P < .0001), with a difference in expenditures of $16,494. Similarly, in matched prevalent patients the event rate was 0.46/PY for endoAVF vs 4.10/PY for SAVF (P < .0001), resulting in a cost difference of $13,389. Time-to-event analysis showed that at 1 year, 70% of endoAVF patients experienced freedom from intervention versus only 18% of SAVF patients for incident patients; these numbers were 62% and 18% for endoAVF and SAVF prevalent patients, respectively (P < .0001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Both incident and prevalent patients with endoAVF required fewer interventions and had lower costs within the first year compared with matched patients with SAVF.