Positive Impact of Implementing a Comprehensive Genetic Testing Protocol for Prostate Cancer Patients in a Multi-disciplinary Uro-oncology Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Prior to the 2017 Philadelphia Consensus Conference guidelines, genetic testing for prostate cancer was conducted based on personal and family history of malignancy pursuant to National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations. The updated 2019 guidelines addressed the subject of genetic testing by endorsing point-of-care genetic testing and referral to genetic counseling. However, limited literature is available regarding successful implementation of a streamlined method for genetic testing. This paper explores the benefits of implementing an on-site guideline-based genetic testing process for prostate cancer patients. METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed for 552 prostate cancer patients seen in a uro-oncology clinic since January 2017. Prior to September 2018 genetic testing was recommended based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, and swabs for testing were procured off-site 1 mile from the clinic (n = 78). After September 2018 genetic testing was recommended based on the Philadelphia Consensus Conference guidelines, and swabs for testing were procured at the clinic itself (n = 474). RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in testing compliance was observed after the implementation of on-site, guideline-based testing. Genetic testing compliance increased from 33.3% to 98.7%. The time to receive the genetic test results was also reduced from 38 days to 21 days. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an on-site, guideline-based genetic testing model for prostate cancer patients significantly improved compliance with genetic testing to 98.7% and decreased the time to receive genetic test results by 17 days. Adopting a guideline-based model with on-site genetic testing can significantly improve the detection rate for pathogenic and actionable mutations and increase the utilization of targeted therapies.

Impact of a prostate multidisciplinary clinic program on patient treatment decisions and on adherence to NCCN guidelines: the William Beaumont Hospital experience.

OBJECTIVES: In order to demonstrate the impact of multidisciplinary care in the community oncology setting, we evaluated treatment decisions after the initiation of a dedicated prostate and genitourinary (GU) multidisciplinary clinic (MDC). METHODS: In March 2010, a GU MDC was created at William Beaumont Hospital with the goal of providing patients with a comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation and consensus treatment recommendations in a single visit. Urologists, radiation, and medical oncologists along with ancillary support staff participated in this comprehensive initial evaluation. The impact of this experience on patient treatment decisions was analyzed. RESULTS: During the first year, a total of 182 patients were seen. Compared with previous years, low-risk MDC patients more frequently chose external beam radiation therapy (41.1% vs. 26.6%, P=0.02), and active surveillance (14.3% vs. 6.1%, P=0.02) and less frequently prostatectomy (30.4% vs. 44.0%, P=0.03). Similar increases in external beam were seen in intermediate and high-risk patients. Increased use of hormonal therapy was found in high-risk patients compared with the years before the initiation of the MDC (76.2% vs. 51.1%, P=0.03). Increased adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines was seen with intermediate-risk patients (89.8% vs. 75.9%, P=0.01), whereas nonsignificant increases were seen in low-risk (100% vs. 98.9%, P=0.43) and high-risk patients (100% vs. 94.2%, P=0.26). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a GU MDC improved the quality of care for cancer patients as demonstrated by improved adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, and a broadening of treatment choices made available.