Diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cancer in adult patients - Recommendations of Polish Scientific Societies and the National Oncological Strategy. 2022 Update [Diagnostyka i leczenie raka tarczycy u chorych doroslych - Rekomendacje Polskich Towarzystw Naukowych oraz Narodowej Strategii Onkologicznej. Aktualizacja na rok 2022].

The guidelines Thyroid Cancer 2022 are prepared based on previous Polish recommendations updated in 2018. They consider international guidelines - American Thyroid Association (ATA) 2015 and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN); however, they are adapted according to the ADAPTE process. The strength of the recommendations and the quality of the scientific evidence are assessed according to the GRADE system and the ATA 2015 and NCCN recommendations. The core of the changes made in the Polish recommendations is the inclusion of international guidelines and the results of those scientific studies that have already proven themselves prospectively. These extensions allow de-escalation of the therapeutic management in low-risk thyroid carcinoma, i.e., enabling active surveillance in papillary microcarcinoma to be chosen alternatively to minimally invasive techniques after agreeing on such management with the patient. Further extensions allow the use of thyroid lobectomy with the isthmus (hemithyroidectomy) in low-risk cancer up to 2 cm in diameter, modification of the indications for postoperative radioiodine treatment toward personalized approach, and clarification of the criteria used during postoperative L-thyroxine treatment. At the same time, the criteria for the preoperative differential diagnosis of nodular goiter in terms of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration biopsy have been clarified, and the rules for the histopathological examination of postoperative thyroid material have been updated. New, updated rules for monitoring patients after treatment are also presented. The updated recommendations focus on ensuring the best possible quality of life after thyroid cancer treatment while maintaining the good efficacy of this treatment.

Diagnostics and Treatment of Thyroid Carcinoma.

Revised Guidelines of Polish National Societies Prepared on the initiative of the Polish Group for Endocrine Tumours approved in their final version between November 16th and 28th, 2015 by the Scientific Committee of the V Conference "Thyroid Cancer and other malignancies of endocrine glands" organised between November 14th and 17th, 2015 in Wisla, Poland; called by the following Societies: Polish Endocrine Society, Polish Society of Oncology, Polish Thyroid Association, Polish Society of Pathologists, Society of Polish Surgeons, Polish Society of Surgical Oncology, Polish Society of Clinical Oncology, Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, Polish Society of Nuclear Medicine, Polish Society of Paediatric Endocrinology, Polish Society of Paediatric Surgeons, Polish Society of Ultrasonography Gliwice-Wisla, 2015 DECLARATION: These recommendations are created by the group of delegates of the National Societies, which declare their willingness to participate in the preparation of the revised version of the Polish Guidelines. The members of the Working Group have been chosen from the specialists involved in medical care of patients with thyroid carcinoma. Directly before the preparation of the Polish national recommendations the American Thyroid Association (ATA) published its own guidelines together with a wide comment fulfilling evidence-based medicine (EBM) criteria. ATA Guidelines are consistent with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Recommendation. According to the members of the Working Group, it is necessary to adapt them to both the specific Polish epidemiological situation as well as to the rules referring to the Polish health system. Therefore, the Polish recommendations constitute a consensus of the experts' group, based on ATA information. The experts analysed previous Polish Guidelines, published in 2010, and other available data, and after discussion summed up the results in the form of these guidelines. It should be added that Part II, which constitutes a pathological part, has been available at the website of the Polish Society of Pathologists for acceptance of the members of the Society, and no essential comments have been proposed. The Members of the Group decided that a subgroup elected from among them would update the Guidelines, according to EBM rules, every year. The Revised Guidelines should help physicians to make reasonable choices in their daily practice; however, the final decision concerning an individual patient should be made by the caring physician responsible for treatment, or optimally by a therapeutic tumour board together with the patient, and should take into consideration the patient's health condition. It should be emphasised that the recommendations may not constitute a strict standard of clinical management imposed on medical staff. The data from clinical trials concerning numerous clinical situations are scarce. In such moments the opinion of the management may differ from the recommendations after considering possible benefits and disadvantages for the patient.

A case of acromegaly and disseminated follicular thyroid carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: A particularly challenging case of concurrent acromegaly and follicular thyroid carcinoma in a patient of the Clinic of Endocrinology, UJCM in Krakow is discussed. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 59-year-old male with post total thyroidectomy performed in 2005 and histopathologically confirmed metastases of the follicular thyroid carcinoma to the lungs was admitted to the Clinic in April 2006 for complementary ¹³¹I treatment. Acromegaly was treated in 1996 by trans-sphenoidal surgery. In December 2005 a relapse of pituitary adenoma was shown by MRI, which correlated with increased levels of hGH and IGF-1. Biochemical control of acromegaly was achieved with Sandostatin LAR. Pre-therapeutic whole-body scintigraphy (WBS) revealed numerous conjoined hot spots of ¹³¹I accumulation in both lungs and in thyroid remnants. In May and November 2006 the patient received ¹³¹I treatment. Post-therapeutic WBS in November 2006 revealed complete ablation of the thyroid remnants. Laboratory tests confirmed lowering of thyroglobulin concentration. In the years 2007, 2008, and 2009 the patient was qualified for therapy with ¹³¹I aided by rhTSH, achieving further reduction of Tg levels. Post-therapeutic WBS performed in 2009 revealed weak bilateral tracer uptake in the lung parenchyma. In 2010, chest CT revealed fibrosis in left lung segments, no infiltrative changes, and no lymph node enlargement. Patient follow-up continues at our Department. CONCLUSIONS: Disseminated thyroid cancer in a patient with pituitary insufficiency may be successfully treated by rhTSH-supported ¹³¹I treatment.

[A case of Graves-Basedow disease with orbitopathy and papillary thyroid cancer]. / Przypadek pacjenta z choroba Gravesa-Basedowa, orbitopatia i rakiem brodawkowatym tarczycy.

Coexistence of Graves-Basedow disease with orbitopathy and thyroid cancer is believed to be a rare event. A 39-year-old man with clinical features of hyperthyroidism associated with exophthalmos and goitre presented to out patient clinic. Thyroid function tests showed hyperthyroidism with elevated thyroid-stimulating antibodies. Graves-Basedow disease was diagnosed. Ultrasound revealed diffuse thyroid enlargement with hypoechoic pattern and hypoechoic lesions with regular edges of 1.0 cm diameter at the left and right lobe. Fine needle aspiration biopsy was negative. Due to the patient's nodular goitre and mild orbitopathy, after some further 3 months of anti-thyroid medication, near total thyroidectomy was performed. Histologically, papillary microcarcinoma was found. Following surgery, the patient was referred to our Department of Endocrinology, L-thyroxine suppression treatment was commenced. Approximately 8 weeks post surgery, the patient reported with eye discomfort, soft tissue oedema and double vision. On CT thickening of the left superior rectus muscle was found. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy was applied (4 weeks, 2 grams per week). Glucocorticoid therapy resulted in significant improvement of soft tissue inflammation and of diplopia. The patient was qualified for 131I radioiodine complementary therapy (3657 MBq) and orbital irradiation. While some authors suggest that radioiodine therapy may be associated with worsening of pre-existing orbitopathy, so far we have not observed it in our patient, perhaps due to thyroid removal as a source of autoreactive T lymphocytes and the protective effect of applied glucocorticoids.

[Diagnostic scintigraphy and effectiveness of 131I radioiodine therapy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC)]. / Scyntygrafia diagnostyczna a skutecznosc leczenia zrósnicowanego raka tarczycy (DTC) radiojodem 131I.

INTRODUCTION: Since the effect of pre-therapeutic scintigraphy on the outcome of DTC treatment is debated, we evaluated factors affecting the effectiveness of (131)I therapy with respect to the delay between diagnostic scintigraphy and the application of radioiodine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the studied group of 60 patients with DTC, mean age 54.6 +/- 13.0 years, four weeks prior to the planned diagnostics, L-thyroxine was withdrawn and the following tests performed: (131)I (4 MBq) uptake above the neck, thyroid volume by USG, TSH and hTg level. Wholebody scintigraphy (37 MBq) was performed. The time between this diagnostic scintigraphy and application of (131)I (3657 MBq) was calculated. Based on whole-body 131I scintigraphy (74 MBq) performed 1 year after radioiodine treatment, the patients were divided into: group I - 42 patients with no tracer accumulation, and group II--18 patients who continued to accumulate (131)I in the neck. RESULTS: The differences between the median values of (131)I uptake and of thyroid volumes, and between the TSH and hTg median values in the two groups of patients were found not to be statistically significant. The average times between diagnostic scintigraphy and (131)I treatment in group I and II (9.4 vs. 8.3 weeks, respectively) were not significantly different either. CONCLUSION: Despite the different effectiveness of supplementary (131)I treatment, patients in group I and group II showed no statistically significant differences in the studied parameters. It appears that the diagnostic (131)I activity of 37 MBq and the time between diagnostic scintigraphy and application of (131)I did not have any effect on the results of the treatment in our group of patients.