Review of the holistic management of pediatric atopic dermatitis.

Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is broadly characterized by eczematous lesions and pruritus. This condition is detrimental in a multitude of ways, including patient quality of life (QOL), family QOL, economic burden, and psychosocial afflictions. Current management needs to incorporate a holistic approach which considers the financial, emotional, and physical limitations of both the treatments and the provider. A non-systematic search was conducted on the holistic management of pediatric AD. Various search queries were used such as the key terms of "atopic dermatitis," "pediatric," "eczema," "management," and more to encompass treatments, adherence, and comorbidities. There is an association with AD and depression in children, and its prevalence should be screened for routinely in children with AD. Collaboration with other specialties may prove to be prudent in addressing this comorbidity. Objective quality of life scores can open the door to much needed conversation with patients to get them the help they need. In expanding our scope, we find the extended consequences of AD have a ripple effect on families of pediatric patients. Lastly, we introduce a model for improving treatment adherence. CONCLUSION: Patient quality-of-life can be negatively affected by the symptoms, expense, stigma, and time commitment, and inconvenience imposed by complicated treatment regimens. To ensure proper, holistic management of pediatric AD, multiple factors must be considered; seasonal changes, lifestyle modifications, and the psychosocial impact are just a couple of factors that require monitoring. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Atopic dermatitis impacts patients and their families in quality of life, economically, and psychosocially. • Current treatment revolves largely around treating physical manifestation of disease with first line measures such as topical steroids. WHAT IS NEW: • The holistic management of AD incorporates a good physician-patient relationship, frequent follow-up, and providing structured written plans. • We introduce the house building model for improving treatment adherence. KEY POINTS: Pediatric AD can be managed in a more holistic manner which incorporates several factors from the lives of patients and their families. Pediatric patients suffer from many physical and mental comorbidities which should be screened for. Adherence with treatment may be improved by following a model which emphasizes establishing a good physician-patient relationship, frequent follow-up, and providing structured written plans.

Real-World Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Palbociclib for HR-Positive/HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Commentary.

Despite the achieved advancement in pharmacological cancer treatments, the majority of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) will experience disease progression. Research into alternative therapies with improved efficacy and reduced side effects has led to the development of a new class of oral anticancer medications, the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, which include palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. Nonetheless, there is growing evidence that the effectiveness of oral anticancer medications is sub-optimal, being influenced by low adherence, sociodemographic factors, and adverse effect profiles. In addition, there is a disconnect between the high price tags of CDK 4/6 inhibitors and their observed effectiveness, raising questions about their value. Currently, the existing knowledge base on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of newer oral anticancer medications in understudied populations with possible health disparities is scant. This commentary discusses what is known about palbociclib's clinical effectiveness, safety, and adherence and suggests the need for further studies of real-world effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to help establish the value of newer oncologic drugs, such as palbociclib. DISCLOSURES: No funding supported the writing of this article. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Survival and cost-effectiveness of sorafenib therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of the SEER-Medicare database.

Sorafenib is the only chemotherapeutic approved for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its effectiveness in patients with Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis and any moderating effects of health system characteristics are unclear. We examined the survival and cost-effectiveness associated with sorafenib in elderly patients with advanced HCC. We performed an analysis of Medicare beneficiaries with HCC diagnoses from 2007 to 2009. We compared advanced stage patients with HCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III/IV) who received sorafenib within 6 months of diagnosis (and were otherwise untreated) to advanced stage patients with HCC who received no therapy (control). We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictors of survival. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for sorafenib-treated and control patients. We included 228 sorafenib-treated patients and 870 control patients. The median survival of the sorafenib-treated patients was 150.5 days versus 62 days for control patients. On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of improved survival were treatment with sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.77), being seen at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97), and being seen at a transplantation center (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93). Predictors of worse survival included stage IV disease (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.58), decompensated cirrhosis (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.30-1.70), and treatment in an urban setting (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.21-1.73.) Although sorafenib use was associated with a survival benefit (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.79) among patients with decompensated cirrhosis, the median survival benefit was 31 days, and it was not cost-effective (ICER, $224,914 per life year gained). CONCLUSION: Sorafenib is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with advanced HCC; however, it is not cost-effective among those with hepatic decompensation. (Hepatology 2017;65:122-133).

Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes Associated with Three Major Inflammatory Dermatologic Diseases: A Propensity-Matched Case Control Study.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammation is an established component of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and an underlying factor of several dermatologic conditions including rosacea, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis. Identifying potential associations between these dermatologic and cardiovascular diseases can better inform holistic healthcare approaches. The objective of this study was to determine whether rosacea, psoriasis or atopic dermatitis are independent risk factors for CVD 1 year following diagnosis. METHODS: Using a large commercial claims database of 21,801,147 lives, we employed a propensity-matched logistic regression to evaluate the association between diagnoses of rosacea, psoriasis, or atopic dermatitis and a 1-year risk of being diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. Control patients were matched based on health-care utilization, age and overall health status as defined by a modified Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index. RESULTS: The analysis included 2105 rosacea, 622 atopic dermatitis, 1536 psoriasis, and 4263 control patients. Compared to propensity-matched controls, the adjusted odds of cardiovascular disease were not higher in patients with rosacea (odds ratio: 0.894, p = 0.2713), atopic dermatitis (OR 1.032, p = 0.8489), or psoriasis (OR 1.087, p = 0.4210). In univariate analysis, the unadjusted odds of cardiovascular disease was higher in patients with psoriasis (OR 1.223, p = 0.0347). CONCLUSIONS: Limitations of this study include the short follow-up period and inclusion of only commercially insured patients limit the generalizability of these findings. In this large study of patients with rosacea, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis, we did not detect an increased 1-year risk of cardiovascular disease after adjusting for confounders.

Population trends and disparities in outpatient utilization of neurologists for ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient stroke utilization may be decreasing over time and may vary by patient demographics. Less is known about temporal trends and demographic variations in outpatient stroke utilization. We assessed ischemic stroke (IS)-related outpatient utilization across physician specialty and time, exploring any demographic variability, using recent US population-based data. METHODS: We identified all outpatient medical visits for IS by adults (≥ 18 years) using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) years 1998 to 2009. Physician numbers were derived from American Medical Association or American Osteopathic Association data by NAMCS. We assessed IS-related outpatient visits to neurologists and generalists over time and by patient demographics. RESULTS: We identified 9.7 million IS-related visits from 1998 to 2009. The rate of IS-related visits to neurologists increased from 0.56 million visits in 1998 to 2000 to 0.90 million visits in 2007 to 2009, representing a 62% increase over the study period. The rate of IS-related visits to generalists declined from 2.0 million visits in 1998 to 2000 to 1.6 million visits in 2007 to 2009 (18% decrease). Between 1998 and 2009, the number of neurologists increased by 23% and the number of generalists grew by 19%. The IS visit rate per 100 physicians increased by 90% for neurologists but decreased by 31% for generalists. Fewer ambulatory IS-related visits to neurologists were reported among stroke survivors who were older, female, nonwhite, or living in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: Between 1998 and 2009, IS-related outpatient utilization increased substantially to neurologists but declined to generalists. We identified demographic variations in outpatient utilization of neurologists that potentially lead to disparities in stroke evaluation and management.

Medication use and associated health care outcomes and costs for patients with psoriasis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The impacts of use of pharmacotherapy for psoriasis on patient outcomes and medication costs need further examination using up-to-date large nationally representative data. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impacts of patient demographics and medication use on patient's health status and associated medication costs. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using the 2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) database. Information on patient demographics, health status, medication utilization, and medication costs were obtained representing 543 231 patients with psoriasis. RESULTS: Weighted multiple linear regression analyses indicated that the use of biological/systemic agents yielded an increase in patient health status among all types of medications (ß = 7.9, p < 0.05). Use of biological/systemic agents also yielded an increase in annual medication spending (ß = 2.5, p < 0.01). Use of biological agents was elevated compared to previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an association between medication use for psoriasis treatment and its related patient health status and medication spending. The study findings could imply that encouraging the use of topical treatments may be an effective means to increase patient health status. The use of biologics needs further cost-effectiveness studies given the findings that biologics contribute to substantial increases in both drug expenditures and patient health status.

Paradoxical effects of cost reduction measures in managed care systems for treatment of severe psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Insurance companies vary widely in their coverage policies for severe psoriasis therapies. Unfortunately, coverage policies for psoriasis therapies do not necessarily follow current treatment paradigms, such that more expensive second or third line treatments may be more easily obtained than first line treatments. METHODS: We reviewed insurance policy bulletins, statements of coverage/medical necessity, and prior authorization forms for three large insurance carriers regarding psoriasis treatment with biologic agents and phototherapy. A cost comparison was performed to estimate total costs to patients and insurer under the current system as well as a hypothetical system in which co-pays and deductibles are eliminated. Additionally, we reviewed the total cost to an insurer for placing a patient on a trial of home phototherapy before approving use of expensive biologics. RESULTS: Requirements for coverage for phototherapy treatments are often the same, if not more stringent, than those for biologics. On an annual per patient basis, insurance companies pay an estimated $5, $76, and $23,408 for home phototherapy, office phototherapy, and biologics, respectively. The first year cost to patients, however, is estimated to be $2,590, $3,040, and $920 for home phototherapy, office phototherapy, and biologics, respectively. An initial 3-month trial of home phototherapy yields a graded annual cost savings to insurers of $21,610 to $2,110 per patient. DISCUSSION: The evolution of psoriasis treatment has resulted in a paradoxical situation in which the use of lower-cost psoriasis treatments, with longer safety track records, is discouraged relative to newer options. If co-pays, deductibles, and prior authorization requirements that discourage phototherapy were reduced or eliminated, more patients and physicians would likely choose phototherapy over biologics. This has the potential to reduce overall healthcare costs for psoriasis management.

Adherence to acitretin and home narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy in patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of psoriasis, patient adherence to oral medications is poor and even worse for topical therapy. However, few data exist about adherence rates to home phototherapy, adding to concerns about the appropriateness of home phototherapy as a psoriasis treatment option. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess adherence to both oral acitretin and home ultraviolet B phototherapy for the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS: In all, 27 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis were treated with 10 to 25 mg of acitretin daily, combined with narrowband ultraviolet B, 3 times weekly at home, for 12 weeks. Adherence to acitretin was monitored by an electronic monitoring medication bottle cap, and to phototherapy by a light-sensing data logger. RESULTS: Adherence data were collected on 22 patients for acitretin and 16 patients for adherence to ultraviolet B. Mean adherence to acitretin decreased steadily during the 12-week trial (slope -0.24), whereas mean adherence to home phototherapy remained steady at 2 to 3 d/wk. Adherence was similar between patients who reported side effects and those who did not. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and lack of follow-up on some patients were limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence rates to home phototherapy were very good and higher than adherence rates for the oral medication. Side effects of treatment were well tolerated in this small group and did not affect use of the treatment. Home phototherapy with acitretin may be an appropriate option for some patients with extensive psoriasis.

Outcomes associated with the use of biologic agents in moderate to severe psoriasis.

An estimated 2.1% of Americans have psoriasis and approximately 30% of them have moderate to severe psoriasis. Although the disease is not associated with mortality, it has a significant impact on health-related quality of life among patients. Several therapies are available for psoriasis including topical agents, phototherapy, and systemic medications. Recently, effective yet expensive biologic agents have been added as treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis. Biologics are recommended in patients for whom all other available treatment options have failed. This extensive review provides important information on the clinical and patient-related outcomes associated with the biologic agents used in psoriasis.

Adverse events from systemic therapies for psoriasis are common in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis frequently require systemic treatment and these medications may be associated with adverse effects. Little is known about the frequency of these events when systemic agents are used in true clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of adverse events associated with various systemic psoriasis therapies. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 753 patients treated in an academic dermatology practice was performed to identify the frequency of adverse events. Poisson regression was used to estimate the odds of significant events for each systemic therapy; UVB-treated patients served as a control population. RESULTS: Methotrexate seemed to be the most prescribed medication. Adverse events were noted with all forms of systemic psoriasis therapy. The highest event rate was seen with oral retinoids, though most of these were considered minor (64%). Cyclosporine had the highest significant adverse event rate (0.9 events/patient). For 'significant' adverse events, oral agents had an adjusted odds ratio>6 compared to standard UVB therapy. The highest risk was for cyclosporine (OR = 20.3); however, the estimate was imprecise (95% confidence interval [4.3, 96.6]). CONCLUSIONS: Traditional psoriasis therapies are associated with significant adverse events in some patients despite toxicity-sparing approaches such as combination therapy. Clinicians need to be aware of screening for adverse events in order to best ensure the safety of their patients and to maximize the efficacy of a given agent. There is still a need for the development of safe and effective treatments for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

The utility of a data-logging device for measuring adherence to home phototherapy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment adherence to home phototherapy is not well characterized. PURPOSE: To develop an accurate measure of home phototherapy unit usage. METHODS: We tested a commercially available data logger containing a photo-sensor on two home phototherapy units. RESULTS: The data logger accurately recorded actual usage and did not record stray light sources over the study period. CONCLUSION: A data logger can accurately capture usage patterns for a home phototherapy unit. These devices could potentially be used in clinical trials to measure adherence to home phototherapy treatment regimens.

Would elimination of copayments for phototherapy decrease the cost of treating psoriasis with systemic biologics? A cost analysis.

Phototherapy is a proven treatment method for the treatment of psoriasis, yet is typically underutilized because of the frequency of physician visits and copayments required for each session (typically 2-5 treatments/wk). Injectable biologic therapies are effective but costly. The objective of this study was to explore how changes in copayment strategies for phototherapy may affect biologic usage. Published estimates of the cost of phototherapy and biologic treatment were used to determine the costs of these treatments to patients and insurers. With an estimated patient copayment of $30 per office visit and a pharmacy copayment of $50 per month, the $1,800 annual patient expense for phototherapy far exceeds the estimated out-of-pocket expenses for etanercept, alefacept, and efalizumab ($840, $405, and $780, respectively). The estimated annual costs to MCOs ranged from $3,008 for phototherapy, to $20,300 for etanercept. Copayments for phototherapy may be shifting patients toward biologic treatment, which is more convenient but more costly to managed care plans.

Home ultraviolet B phototherapy: a cost-effective option for severe psoriasis.

The cost of treating severe psoriasis has risen dramatically, and treatment options vary widely in terms of cost and efficacy. However, little information is available on the relative costs of home phototherapy and other long-term management options, specifically in the context of managed care. A payer-perspective cost model was developed to estimate and compare the direct expenditures associated with a 30-year course of various treatments for severe psoriasis. Within two years of treatment initiation, home-administered ultraviolet B phototherapy was less costly than any of the other treatments examined, including methotrexate, psoralen plus ultraviolet A, the retinoid acitretin, and new biologic agents. In addition, the efficacy and safety profile of home ultraviolet B phototherapy make it an excellent choice for extended management.

Limited availability of psoriasis and phototherapy care: an analysis of advertisements.

Because the number of dermatologists remains stable, patients with medical dermatologic conditions such as psoriasis may find it increasingly difficult to access dermatological treatment. Measuring the competition in the marketing of dermatologic care may provide insight into the availability of dermatology services. The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent dermatologists are using the Yellow Pages to advertise to patients with psoriasis. We performed a quantitative and qualitative assessment of dermatologists' Yellow Pages advertisements in small cities and the ten largest metropolitan regions in the country. Per capita, more advertisements were found in smaller markets than larger markets and a higher percentage was descriptive rather than just a name, address and phone number. Cosmetic and surgical advertisements were more common than psoriasis ads in both markets. Cosmetic ads were more prevalent in larger markets. In all regions, psoriasis and psoriasis treatment ads were least common. These findings raise the concern that incentive structures in the United States healthcare system do not adequately support delivery of dermatologic care for psoriasis. Efforts to promote psoriasis care should be encouraged.

Inpatient management of severe psoriasis.

Historically, severe psoriasis frequently required inpatient hospitalization for several weeks to reduce symptoms and prevent morbidity and mortality, Despite declining hospitalization rates there remain patients who undergo severe, acute psoriasis exacerbations requiring inpatient care. The majority of the literature describes the treatment of psoriasis in the outpatient setting. We review the inherent differences between the inpatient and outpatient management of psoriasis along several dimensions and discuss an approach to the inpatient treatment of severe psoriasis based upon therapeutic rate of onset, efficacy, and safety. The inpatient setting benefits from and lends itself to use of rapid acting, highly effective agents. Given the acute nature of psoriasis inpatient episodes, the risks associated with long-term use of a treatment are far less important in inpatient setting treatment planning than they are in the outpatient setting.

Factors associated with herbal use among urban multiethnic primary care patients: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: The use of herbal supplements in the United States has become increasingly popular. The prevalence of herbal use among primary care patients varies in previous studies; the pattern of herbal use among urban racially/ethnically diverse primary care patients has not been widely studied. The primary objectives of this study were to describe the use of herbs by ethnically diverse primary care patients in a large metropolitan area and to examine factors associated with such use. The secondary objective was to investigate perceptions about and patterns of herbal use. METHODS: Data for a cross-sectional survey were collected at primary care practices affiliated with the Southern Primary-care Urban Research Network (SPUR-Net) in Houston, Texas, from September 2002 to March 2003. To participate in the study, patients had to be at least 18 years of age and visiting one of the SPUR-Net clinics for routine, nonacute care. Survey questions were available in both English and Spanish. RESULTS: A total of 322 patients who had complete information on race/ethnicity were included in the analysis. Overall, 36% of the surveyed patients (n = 322) indicated use of herbs, with wide variability among ethnic groups: 50% of Hispanics, 50% of Asians, 41% of Whites, and 22% of African-Americans. Significant factors associated with an individual's herbal use were ethnicity other than African-American, having an immigrant family history, and reporting herbal use by other family members. About 40% of survey respondents believed that taking prescription medications and herbal medicines together was more effective than taking either alone. One-third of herbal users reported using herbs on a daily basis. More Whites (67%) disclosed their herbal use to their health-care providers than did African-Americans (45%), Hispanics (31%), or Asians (31%). CONCLUSIONS: Racial/ethnic differences in herbal use were apparent among this sample of urban multiethnic adult primary care patients. Associated factors of herbal use were non-African-American ethnicity, immigrant family history, and herbal use among family members. Whereas Hispanics and Asians reported the highest rates of herbal use, they were the least likely to disclose their use to health-care professionals. These findings are important for ensuring medication safety in primary care practices.

The frequent use of oral retinoids in combination with other treatments for psoriasis: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Combination treatment in psoriasis may be common, logical, and appropriate, even if not well tested or well documented by clinical trials. While oral retinoids such as acitretin can be used as monotherapy, efficacy can be further augmented by combination use with other agents. Similarly, because of its safety profile, acitretin can be added in low doses to help patients who have not achieved adequate control with other psoriasis treatments. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess how oral retinoids are used in combination with other drugs to treat psoriasis. METHODS: We assessed the use of acitretin and other oral retinoids for the treatment of psoriasis using two sources of information: nationally representative survey data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and local data obtained by chart review of 518 patients seen in a university dermatology clinic. RESULTS: In the NAMCS, oral retinoids were prescribed with other psoriasis medications at 71% of visits. In the chart review, combination use was even more frequent (96% of subjects were on combination treatment) and included combinations of acitretin with topicals, phototherapy, and other systemic treatments. Adverse events were reported in 53% of patients treated with acitretin, although none were severe. CONCLUSION: Use of acitretin in combination with many other psoriasis treatments is a common practice. Mucocutaneous side effects of oral retinoids are common but with appropriate dosing are generally mild.