Low-Intensity Laser Light Projection for Improved Reading Abilities in Low-Vision Patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a new laser imaging device that projects images onto functioning macular areas, to improve visual acuity (VA) in low-vision patients with macular diseases. METHODS: An interventional case series of consecutive patients with low vision in their right eyes (RE). RE VA was measured by showing the patients digits of various standard sizes and measuring their best-corrected VA (BCVA). Then, using the I.C.INSIDE device to project the same standard digits onto functioning macular areas. Patient's ability to recognize the digits with the I.C.INSIDE device was correlated with patient's performance using telescopic low-vision aids. The main outcome measure was change in VA with the different visual aids. RESULTS: Eleven patients (6 males and 5 females) with an average age of 75 ± 6.7 years and low vision in their RE due to macular diseases were included in the study. Baseline BCVA was 1.554 ± 0.50 logMAR. Low-vision aids improved mean VA in 10 patients to 0.64 ± 0.40 logMAR (p < .0001), further improvement was noticed in 8 patients to 0.35 ± 0.16 logMAR (p < .0001) using the laser device, but, three patients did not recognize any digit using the laser device. CONCLUSIONS: The I.C.INSIDE device significantly improved baseline VA in low-vision patients with macular diseases, using extra-foveal fixation.

TRActional DIabetic reTInal detachment surgery with co-adjuvant intravitreal dexamethasONe implant: the TRADITION STUDY.

AIM: Main failure of diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD) surgery is the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), causing higher re-detachment rates. We investigated whether the use of dexamethasone (DEX) implant at the end of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with silicone oil tamponade might have an impact on these outcomes. DESIGN: Comparative, nonrandomized, retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 148 eyes from 148 patients that underwent PPV with silicone oil tamponade for diabetic TRD (with DEX implant, n = 52; without DEX implant, n = 96). METHODS: Consecutive patients' records were reviewed for time between TRD diagnosis and surgery; lens status before surgery and after 6, 12, and 24 months; retina attachment rate after primary PPV; change in postoperative PVR severity; rate of re-detachment at 6, 12, and 24 months; use of IOP lowering treatment after 6, 12, and 24 months; surgery details; intra- and postoperative complications. Correlations between outcome measures, postoperative PVR severity, and re-detachment rates were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in postoperative PVR severity and retinal re-detachment rates with and without the adjuvant use of DEX implant. RESULTS: Retinal re-detachment rates were significantly higher in the group of patients that did not receive DEX implant [11/96 (11.5%) vs. 0/52 (0%), p = 0.049; 11/84 (12.9%) vs. 4/52 (7.7%), p = 0.007; 14/71 (19.7%) vs. 5/52 (10%) p < 0.001 at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively]. PVR severity correlated with retinal status at 12 and 24 months (p = 0.018 and p = 0.027, respectively). The difference in PVR severity between the two groups was statistically significant at 6, 12, and 24 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DEX implant at the end of PPV in patients with diabetic TRD improves PVR severity and decreases re-detachment rates. This should be considered as an option in the customized treatment of TRD.

Electrophysiologic and retinal penetration studies following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin).

PURPOSE: Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech Inc., San Francisco, CA) is a new treatment for age-related macular degeneration. The aim of this study was to evaluate retinal penetration and toxicity of bevacizumab. METHODS: Ten albino rabbits were injected intravitreally with 0.1 mL (2.5 mg) of Avastin into one eye and 0.1 mL saline into the fellow eye. The electroretinogram (ERG) was recorded after 3 hours, 3 days, and 1, 2, and 4 weeks. The visual evoked potential (VEP) was recorded after 4 weeks. Confocal immunohistochemistry was used to assess retinal penetration. RESULTS: The ERG responses of the control and experimental eyes were similar in amplitude and pattern throughout the follow-up period. The flash VEP responses of the experimental eyes were of normal pattern and amplitude and did not differ from those recorded by stimulation of the control eye alone. Full thickness retinal penetration was present at 24 hours and was essentially absent at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab was found to be nontoxic to the retina of rabbits based on electrophysiologic studies. Full thickness retinal penetration may explain observed clinical effects of intravitreal bevacizumab. Although it is difficult to directly extrapolate to humans, our study supports the safe use of intravitreal bevacizumab injection.