Efficacy of biological therapies and small molecules in induction and maintenance of remission in luminal Crohn's disease: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There are numerous biological therapies and small molecules licensed for luminal Crohn's disease (CD), but these are often studied in placebo-controlled trials, meaning relative efficacy is uncertain. We examined this in a network meta-analysis. DESIGN: We searched the literature to 1 July 2022, judging efficacy according to induction of clinical remission, clinical response and maintenance of clinical remission, and according to previous exposure or non-exposure to biologics. We used a random effects model and reported data as pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs, ranking drugs according to p-score. RESULTS: We identified 25 induction of remission trials (8720 patients). Based on failure to achieve clinical remission, infliximab 5 mg/kg ranked first versus placebo (RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.79, p-score 0.95), with risankizumab 600 mg second and upadacitinib 45 mg once daily third. However, risankizumab 600 mg ranked first for clinical remission in biologic-naïve (RR=0.66, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.85, p-score 0.78) and in biologic-exposed patients (RR=0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.82, p-score 0.92). In 15 maintenance of remission trials (4016 patients), based on relapse of disease activity, upadacitinib 30 mg once daily ranked first (RR=0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.72, p-score 0.93) with adalimumab 40 mg weekly second, and infliximab 10 mg/kg 8-weekly third. Adalimumab 40 mg weekly ranked first in biologic-naïve patients (RR=0.59, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.73, p-score 0.86), and vedolizumab 108 mg 2-weekly first in biologic-exposed (RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86, p-score 0.82). CONCLUSION: In a network meta-analysis, infliximab 5 mg/kg ranked first for induction of clinical remission in all patients with luminal CD, but risankizumab 600 mg was first in biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed patients. Upadacitinib 30 mg once daily ranked first for maintenance of remission.

Serum triiodothyronine-to-thyroxine (T3/T4) ratio predicts therapeutic outcome to biological therapies in elderly IBD patients.

INTRODUCTION: Rates of elderly patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are increasing, and biomarkers are needed to optimise their therapies. Serum triiodothyronine-to-thyroxine (T3/T4) ratio has been correlated with geriatric patient frailty. AIM: To assess the suitability of T3/T4 ratio as a response marker to biologics in elderly patients with IBD. METHODS: Patients with IBD over 60 years old were enrolled, when starting biological therapy. Therapeutic outcome was assessed after 54 weeks of treatment as mucosal healing (Mayo endoscopic score < 2 for ulcerative colitis; ulcer disappearance for Crohn's disease) and clinical remission (Partial Mayo Score < 2 for ulcerative colitis; Harvey-Bradshaw Index < 5 for Crohn's disease). T3/T4 ratio was evaluated at baseline, and its association with therapeutic outcomes was tested by multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC). RESULTS: We enrolled 80 patients; 44 achieved clinical remission and 36 mucosal healing. Baseline T3/T4 ratio was higher in patients with mucosal healing, as compared with those without mucosal healing (P < 0.0001), regardless of the disease type or biological drug (OR 6.4 [2.9-14.3] for each T3/T4 unit increase, P < 0.0001). A cut point of 3.3 was identified as the optimal threshold of baseline T3/T4 ratio for predicting mucosal healing, providing 78% sensitivity and 89% specificity (area under the ROC curve 0.88 [0.79-0.94]; positive and negative likelihood ratios 6.8 [2.9-15.9] and 0.3 [0.1-0.5] respectively). CONCLUSIONS: T3/T4 ratio seems a reliable tool for predicting therapeutic outcome of biological therapy in elderly patients with IBD. If validated, the assessment of this parameter before starting biological treatment might be suggested.