RESUMO
Cancer pain is one of the most disabling symptoms complained by cancer patients, with a crucial impact on physical and psychological well-being. Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) type A and B have emerged as potential interventions for chronic pain; however, their role in these patients is still debated. Thus, this systematic review of randomized controlled trials aimed at assessing the effects of BoNT treatment for cancer pain to guide physicians in an evidence-based approach integrating BoNT in cancer care. Out of 5824 records, 10 RCTs satisfied our eligibility criteria and were included in the present work for a total of 413 subjects with several cancer types (breast, head and neck, esophageal, and thoracic/gastric cancers). While some studies demonstrated significant pain reduction and improved quality of life post-BoNT-A injections, outcomes across different cancer types were inconclusive. Additionally, several effects were observed in functioning, dysphagia, salivary outcomes, esophageal strictures, gastric emptying, and expansions. This review emphasizes the need for further standardized research to conclusively establish the efficacy of BoNT in comprehensive cancer pain management.
Assuntos
Dor do Câncer , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Toxinas Botulínicas/uso terapêutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
Axillary web syndrome (AWS) is a highly prevalent surgical complication affecting BC survivors. It presents as a subcutaneous cording that limits the upper limb range of motion (ROM) and causes pain. Its etiology is still debated, and its treatment is not well defined. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of our specific AWS rehabilitative treatment protocol. We conducted an observational retrospective study on a cohort of 92 AWS patients referred to the oncological outpatient service of a university hospital. We collected data from medical records before (T0) and after (T1) the treatment. The studied protocol was composed of 60-min sessions, carried out 3 times/week by specialized physiotherapists, until the clinical resolution of AWS. We found that a mean of 8.74 ± 2.12 rehabilitative sessions were needed, and only one patient stopped early. At T1, shoulder ROM was complete in both abduction and flexion in 98% of patients; AWS was no longer detectable in 64% of them, and pain significantly decreased compared to T0. In conclusion, our protocol proved to be safe, well-tolerated and seemed to be effective in treating AWS.
RESUMO
Introduction: In rehabilitation practice, the term 'feedback' is often improperly used, with augmented feedback and biofeedback frequently confused, especially when referring to the human-machine interaction during technologically assisted training. The absence of a clear differentiation between these categories represents an unmet need for rehabilitation, emphasized by the advent of new technologies making extensive use of video feedback, exergame, and virtual reality.Area covered: In this review we tried to present scientific knowledge about feedback, biofeedback, augmented feedback and neurofeedback, and related differences in rehabilitation settings, for a more proper use of this terminology. Despite the continuous expansion of the field, few researches clarify the differences among these terms. This scoping review was conducted through the searching of current literature up to May 2020, using following databases: PUBMED, EMBASE and Web of Science. After literature search a classification system, distinguishing feedback, augmented feedback, and biofeedback, was applied.Expert opinion: There is a need for clear definitions of feedback, biofeedback, augmented feedback, and neurofeedback in rehabilitation, especially in the technologically assisted one based on human-machine interaction. In fact, the fast development of new technologies requires to be based on solid concepts and on a common terminology shared among bioengineers and clinicians.
Assuntos
Biorretroalimentação Psicológica , Realidade Virtual , Retroalimentação , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is little evidence on intra-articular (IA) treatment in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and there is a lack of long-term follow-up studies. OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of IA oxygen-ozone (O2O3) and hyaluronic acid (HA) in terms of functioning in KOA patients over a 31-week period. METHODS: Patients aged ⩾ 60 years with KOA were randomly allocated to receive 4 IA knee injections (1/week) of O2O3 or HA (T0-T3) and a follow-up visit 4 weeks after the fourth injection (T4). In this extension study we assessed VAS and safety in patients with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ⩾ 4 at the at 6-month follow-up visit (T5), undergoing a second treatment cycle (T5-T8) and 1-month follow-up visit (T9). RESULTS: Forty-two patients (aged 70.5 ± 5.8 years) were randomly allocated to O2O3 (n= 22) or HA group (n= 20). Twenty-three underwent another IA cycle: 12 (54.6%) in the O2O3 group and 11 (55.0%) in the HA group. Both groups showed significant reduction in VAS (p< 0.013) compared to baseline during both cycles. At follow-up visits (T4 and T9), VAS was significantly lower in the HA group (p< 0.013). There were no differences in adverse events occurrence between groups. CONCLUSIONS: IA O2O3 might be comparable to HA in terms of effectiveness and safety in reducing pain in KOA patients, although at both follow-up visits (T4 and T9) VAS was significantly lower in the HA group.
Assuntos
Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Oxigênio/administração & dosagem , Ozônio/administração & dosagem , Viscossuplementos/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Articulação do Joelho , Masculino , Dor , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento , Escala Visual AnalógicaRESUMO
Hip fractures are the most common osteoporotic fractures related to disability in older adults, requiring surgery and a subsequent rehabilitation treatment. Sarcopenia is currently considered as a predictive of worse outcome in hip fracture patients and myostatin has been recently proposed a potential biomarker of this condition. Twenty hip fracture patients after total hip replacement (mean aged 75.9 ± 2.4 years) were randomly divided into two groups of ten subjects (groups A and B). Both groups performed a rehabilitation program (5 sessions of 40 min/week for 2 weeks, followed by home-based exercise protocol). Group A received also 2-month amino acid supplementation. Serum myostatin levels significantly decreased after 2 months in both group A (p = 0.01) and group B (p = 0.03) in sarcopenic patients only in group A (p = 0.04). These results suggest that myostatin might be considered a promising biomarker of sarcopenia in hip fracture older adults' patients undergoing rehabilitation and amino acid supplementation.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril/reabilitação , Miostatina/sangue , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia de Quadril , Biomarcadores/sangue , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Monitorização Fisiológica , Avaliação Nutricional , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Dados Preliminares , SarcopeniaRESUMO
We describe the case of a 68-year-old woman with an acute episode of severe low back pain (LBP) resistant to opioids, who had experienced a sacral insufficiency fracture (SIF) two years earlier. At clinical examination, patient reported constant, dull, non-localizable pain at lumbar and sacral level, exacerbated by paravertebral palpation, particularly at L4-L5 and the sacroiliac joint, with a concomitant and remittent neuropathic component, difficult to localize at lumbar and sacral level. The latest magnetic resonance imaging study revealed disc herniations at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 levels. The patient was treated with intramuscularparavertebral injections of oxygen-ozone (O2O3) mixture for 4 weeks (once a week), using a O3 concentration of 20 mcg/mL (5 mL in L4-L5 zone and 5 mL in L5-S1 zone, bilaterally). At 1 week after the first injection, the pain (assessed by Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Brief Pain Inventory) was considerably reduced and the patient's health-related quality of life (assessed by Short Form 12-Item Health Survey and European Quality of Life Index) had improved; these findings were confirmed at follow-up 1 month after the last injection. This paradigmatic case of nociplastic pain successfully treated by paravertebral O2O3 therapy might be a starting point for further studies on the effects of this treatment in terms of decreasing pain and improving HRQoL in patients affected by opioid-resistant LBP.
Assuntos
Fraturas de Estresse/complicações , Dor Lombar/tratamento farmacológico , Nociceptividade/efeitos dos fármacos , Oxigênio/administração & dosagem , Ozônio/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/complicações , Dor Lombar/etiologia , Medição da Dor , Sacro/lesões , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection is an effective treatment for lower-limb spasticity and should be offered as first-line treatment for focal manifestations. Although its possible role has been hypothesized, the efficacy of electrical stimulation (ES) of antagonists of the injected muscles for improving clinical outcome after BoNT-A injection remains to be established. OBJECTIVES: This randomized single-blind pilot study aimed to investigate the efficacy of ES of antagonist muscles as adjunct treatment after BoNT-A injection to plantar flexor muscles in hemiplegic patients with spastic equinus foot. METHODS: After BoNT-A injection at triceps surae, patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups: group 1, single ES session on injected muscles plus 5 sessions of ES on antagonist muscles, and group 2, single ES session on injected muscles alone. Both groups underwent daily physical therapy for 60min for 2 weeks (5 days/week). Assessments were performed before treatment (T0) and at 10 days (T1), 20 days (T2), and 90 days (T3) after treatment. Our primary outcome was gait velocity at a comfortable speed at T2 (10-m walk test [10MWT]). The following were secondary outcomes: triceps surae spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale), ankle passive range of motion (pROM), strength of tibialis anterior muscle, and 2-min walk test (2MWT). RESULTS: The 30 patients enrolled were randomly allocated to the 2 groups: 15 in group 1 and 15 in group 2. At T1, T2 and T3, both groups showed a significant reduction in muscle tone and an increase in ankle pROM (P<0.05). At T2 and T3, both groups showed a significant increase in 10MWT and 2MWT. The groups did not significantly differ in tibialis anterior strength or primary or secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: ES of antagonist muscles does not improve clinical outcomes in the post-stroke spastic equinus foot after BoNT-A injection.
Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Pé Equino/terapia , Espasticidade Muscular/terapia , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Pé Equino/tratamento farmacológico , Pé Equino/etiologia , Feminino , Hemiplegia/tratamento farmacológico , Hemiplegia/etiologia , Hemiplegia/terapia , Humanos , Perna (Membro) , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espasticidade Muscular/tratamento farmacológico , Espasticidade Muscular/etiologia , Resistência Física , Projetos Piloto , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Método Simples-Cego , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A wide range of adjunct therapies after botulinum toxin administration have been proposed. The aim of the present paper is to provide an overview of major writings dealing with adjuvant (non-pharmacological) treatments associated with botulinum toxin for managing spasticity in order to provide some up-to-date information about the usefulness of the most commonly used procedures. METHODS: The literature in PubMed was searched with the MeSH terms botulinum toxins, muscle spasticity, physical therapy modalities, and rehabilitation. The results were limited to studies focusing on adjuvant treatments associated with botulinum toxin for managing spasticity. We excluded papers on the use of non-drug treatments for spasticity not associated with botulinum toxin serotype A (BoNT-A) injection. Relevant literature known to the authors along with this complementary search represented the basis for this overview of the literature. RESULTS: Adhesive taping and casting effectively improved the botulinum toxin effect in patients with upper- and lower-limb spasticity. There is level 1 evidence that casting is better than taping for outcomes including spasticity, range of motion and gait. However, consensus about their most appropriate timing, duration, target and material is lacking. In terms of physical modalities combined with botulinum toxin injection, we found level 1 evidence that extracorporeal shock wave therapy is better than electrical stimulation for some post-injection outcomes including spasticity and pain. Furthermore, electrical stimulation of injected muscles might be useful to boost the toxin effect. However, the best stimulation protocol has not been defined. In addition, we found level 2b evidence that whole-body vibration therapy might reduce spasticity with cerebral palsy. CONCLUSION: Future research in this field should focus on investigating the most appropriate post-injection treatment protocol for each goal to achieve.
Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Espasticidade Muscular/terapia , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Fita Atlética , Moldes Cirúrgicos , Terapia Combinada , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Tratamento por Ondas de Choque Extracorpóreas , Humanos , Imobilização , Espasticidade Muscular/tratamento farmacológico , Aparelhos Ortopédicos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Contenções , Vibração/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of treatment after botulinum toxin type A combined with treatments for the spastic foot. DESIGN: Single-blind, randomized trial, with 3-month follow-up. SUBJECTS: Twenty-three chronic hemiplegic adult patients with spastic equinus foot. METHODS: Following botulinum toxin type A injection at the medial and lateral gastrocnemius, patients were assigned randomly to 3 groups, and treated with taping, electrical stimulation or stretching. They were evaluated before treatment (t0), and at 10 (t1), 20 (t2) and 90 (t3) days after treatment. Outcome measures were: Modified Ashworth Scale; passive range of motion at the ankle; measurement of muscle action potential at the gastrocnemius medialis; and measurement of maximum ankle dorsiflexion angle in stance using gait analysis. RESULTS: The group treated with electrical stimulation performed better at t1 on the Modified Ashworth Scale. The taping and electrical stimulation groups performed better in all outcome measures at t3. The taping group performed better mainly for maximum ankle dorsiflexion angle in stance. The stretching group showed a less durable result, with some worsening at the t3 evaluation compared with the assessment performed before treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicates that combining botulinum toxin type A administration for the ankle plantar flexors with taping and electrical stimulation might be beneficial.