The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC): Recommendations on Best Practices for Cervical Neurostimulation.

INTRODUCTION: The International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians based on expertise with international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on the use of neurostimulation in the cervical region to improve outcomes. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) project intends to provide evidence-based guidance for an often-overlooked area of neurostimulation practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Authors were chosen based upon their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from 2017 (when NACC last published guidelines) to the present. Identified studies were graded using the US Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on the strength of evidence or consensus when evidence was scant. RESULTS: The NACC examined the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to guide best practices. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process. CONCLUSIONS: The NACC recommends best practices regarding the use of cervical neuromodulation to improve safety and efficacy. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations should be utilized as a guide to assist decision making when clinically appropriate.

Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Back Pain: Therapy Outcome Predictive Factors.

OBJECTIVE: To identify variables that influence pain reduction following peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) in order to identify a potential responder profile. METHODS: Exploratory univariate and multivariate (random forest) analyses were performed separately on 2 randomized controlled trials and a registry; all included patients with chronic back pain, mainly failed back surgery syndrome. An international expert panel judged the clinical relevance of variables to identify responders by consensus. RESULTS: Variables identified that may help predict PNFS success in patients with back pain include patient and pain characteristics (age, time since onset of pain and spinal surgery, pain medication history, position and size of pain area, pain severity, mixed nociceptive/neuropathic pain, health-related quality of life, depression, functional disability, and leg pain status), implant procedure variables (the number and position of leads, paresthesia coverage, and amount of pain relief during the trial), and programming (number of programs, cathodes, and anodes; pulse rate; pulse width; and percentage of device usage). CONCLUSIONS: While these analyses are exploratory and restricted to a limited sample size, they suggest variables that may play a role in predicting a therapeutic response. These results, however, are informative only and should be cautiously interpreted. Future research to validate the variables in a clinical study is needed.

Using peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to treat neuropathic pain: a clinical series.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) in treating neuropathic and causalgic pain, with a stimulation system specifically designated for PNS itself. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 patients were treated between January 2011 and March 2012. The percutaneous lead was implanted on the nerves, exposing it on the electrical nerve stimulation (ENS) guide. The average numeric rating scale (NRS) preimplant was 8.46, and the oxycodone intake was 90 mg/day. RESULTS: Of the 15 patients, 3 failed the trial phase and 12 were implanted with a permanent pulse generator (Lightpulse 100, Neurimpulse, Rubano, PD, Italy). At an average of 9.3 months of follow-up, the average NRS score was 3.46 (p < 0.001), and the average Likert scale score at 7 points was 5.91. Nine patients were working prior to their injuries, seven of whom returned to work after receiving an implant. The average oxycodone consumption decreased to 30 mg/day, and the pregabalin dosage decreased to 75 mg/day. CONCLUSION: Our study results confirm that PNS is an effective modality in managing severe neuropathic and intractable pain following multiple joint surgeries that are complicated by causalgic pain.

Peripheral nerve field stimulation for the management of localized chronic intractable back pain: results from a randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Improved device technology has caused a renewed interest in peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNfS). This study sought to obtain preliminary estimates of the safety and efficacy of PNfS in patients with localized chronic intractable pain of the back. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective, randomized, controlled, crossover study consisted of two phases. During phase I, patients rotated through four stimulation groups (minimal, subthreshold, low frequency, and standard stimulation). If a 50% reduction in pain was achieved during any of the three active stimulation groups (responder), the patient proceeded to phase II, which began with implant of the permanent system and lasted 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was a reduction in pain, assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS). Analysis of variance, including the effects of patient, treatment, and study period, was used for phase I results. Phase II results were analyzed by paired t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were enrolled at five sites. Of these patients, 32 were implanted with a trial system and 30 completed phase I. During phase I, there were significant differences in mean VAS scores between minimal stimulation and subthreshold stimulation (p = 0.003), low frequency stimulation (p < 0.001), and standard stimulation (p < 0.001). Twenty-four patients were classified as responders to the therapy, and 23 patients received permanent system placement. Significant differences in VAS scores were observed between baseline and all follow-up visits during phase II (p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: The results provide evidence to support safety and effectiveness of PNfS as an aid in the management of chronic, localized back pain.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in conjunction with peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNfS) for the treatment of complex pain in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS).

BACKGROUND: Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a well-defined pathologic condition observed over many years. DESIGN: We have investigated the effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNfS) in eight patients with FBSS. OUTCOME MEASURE: The following parameters were collected and analyzed: The pain intensity score on a 0-10 numbering rating scale (NRS), the psychologic profile with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the pain quality with McGill Pain Questionnaire-short form (MGPQ-sf), the back pain with Oswestry scale score (OS), and the health general quality pattern with QualityMetric's SF-36v2(®) Health Survey. PATIENTS: Eight patients with low back and radicular pain in FBSS are reported. The mean duration of pain was 6.7 months, and the mean NRS score was 9.5, BDI 28.8, MGPQ-sf 16.8, OS 44.5, and SF-36 score was 72.8. The average drug intake of opioids was 250 mg/day. INTERVENTION: In six patients, two octopolar leads were placed in epidural space at D7-D8 and D8-D9, in conjunction with two octopolar leads placed in lumbar-sacral subcutaneous space (Precision System, Boston Scientific, Valencia, CA, USA), and in two patients, a two tetrapolar leads was placed in epidural space at D8-D9 with two tetrapolar leads (Pisces Quad, Plus, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) placed in lumbar-sacral subcutaneous space (Restore Ultra, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). RESULTS: After one year mean of follow-up, the mean NRS score was 4, BDI 8, MGPQ-sf 5, OS 21, and the SF-36 score was increased at 108.5. The mean drug intake of opioids was decreased at 20 mg/day. CONCLUSION: The combination of SCS and PNfS, using the latest rechargeable systems, may be a valid therapeutic strategy in FBSS.

Incidence and avoidance of neurologic complications with paddle type spinal cord stimulation leads.

INTRODUCTION: While reference is frequently made to the risk of spinal cord or nerve root injury with the surgical implantation of paddle type spinal cord stimulation (SCS) electrodes, data are lacking on the frequency, causes, and prevention of these complications. METHODS: To determine the incidence and frequency of neurologic complications, we performed 1) a comprehensive analysis of the literature to determine the incidence of complications that have caused or could lead to neurologic injury; 2) an analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) data base; and 3) an investigation of manufacturers' data on surgically implanted paddle electrodes. We then convened an expert panel of neurosurgeons experienced in the surgical implantation of paddle electrodes to provide recommendations to minimize the risk of neurologic injury. RESULTS: The scientific literature describes the breadth of neurologic complications that can result from SCS electrode implantation but does not provide interpretable data with respect to the incidence and frequency of these complications. The MAUDE data base is not constructed to be sensitive or specific enough to provide these critical data. Primary data show a risk of neurologic injury from implantation of paddle electrodes below 0.6%. DISCUSSION: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative measures to further minimize this risk are described. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation, the first comprehensive evaluation of the incidence and frequency of neurologic injury as a result of SCS paddle electrode implantation, suggests that neurologic injury is a rare, but serious, complication of SCS. The incidence of these complications should be decreased by the adoption of approaches that improve procedural safety and by careful patient follow-up and complication management. Physicians should be aware of these approaches and take every precaution to reduce the risk of neurologic injury. Physicians also should report any adverse event leading to injury or death and work together to improve access to these data.

Peripheral subcutaneous stimulation for intractable abdominal pain.

Peripheral subcutaneous stimulation has been utilized for a variety of painful conditions affecting the abdominal wall, including sequelae of hernia repair, painful surgical scars, ilio-inguinal neuritis. It has also occasionally been shown to be effective in patients with intractable abdominal visceral pain. Since this is a very recent modality, no large series or prospective studies exist. The results, however, are promising and certainly warrant further investigation.

Neurophysiological evidence of antidromic activation of large myelinated fibres in lower limbs during spinal cord stimulation.

STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed to verify the hypothesis of a constant, antidromic activation of fibers traveling along peripheral sensory nerves during spinal cord stimulation (SCS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the neurophysiological characteristics (latency, amplitude, waveform) of potentials recorded in peripheral sensory nerves during the SCS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SCS is widely used for the relief of chronic benign pain resistant to conservative therapies, but its antalgic mechanism is poorly understood. Antidromic activation of peripheral nerve fibers is one of the hypothesized antalgic mechanisms, but very few neurophysiological studies have been conducted on this subject. METHODS: Sixteen patients undergoing a percutaneous test trial of SCS for chronic pain in the lower limb (4 males, 12 females, mean age of 54.2, and age range 41-77 years) were enrolled. Diagnoses included: failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome type I, painful lumbosacral radiculopathy, and painful peripheral neuropathy. All patients had a lead percutaneously implanted in the epidural space at a vertebral level ranging from T9-T12. Nerve action potentials were generally recorded in nonpainful leg but, when the pain was outside the investigated nerve territory, a bilateral recording was performed. Twenty-one different studies were carried out on 16 patients. RESULTS: The results confirmed the hypothesis that cutaneous afferents were regularly activated by SCS. CONCLUSION: The authors hypothesize that this antidromic activation could represent a possible antalgic mechanism of SCS in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain, but further neurophysiological studies will be needed to elucidate this hypothesis.

Automated, patient-interactive, spinal cord stimulator adjustment: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Programmable, multicontact, implanted stimulation devices represent an important advance in spinal cord stimulation for the management of pain. They facilitate the technical goal of covering areas of pain by stimulation-evoked paresthesiae. Adjustment after implantation requires major investments of time and effort, however, if the capabilities of these devices are to be used to full advantage. The objective of maximizing coverage should be met while using practitioners' time efficiently. METHODS: We have developed a patient-interactive, computerized system designed for greater ease and safety of operation, compared with the standard external devices used to control and adjust implanted pulse generators. The system automatically and rapidly presents to the patient the contact combinations and pulse parameters specified by the practitioner. The patient adjusts the amplitude of stimulation and then records drawings of stimulation paresthesiae (for comparison with pain drawings), followed by visual analog scale ratings for each setting. Test results are analyzed and sorted to determine the optimal settings. We compared the automated, patient-interactive system with traditional, practitioner-operated, manual programming methods in a randomized controlled trial at two study centers, with 44 patients. RESULTS: The automated, patient-interactive system yielded significantly (P < 0.0001) better technical results than did traditional manual methods, in achieving coverage of pain by stimulation paresthesiae (mean 100-point visual analog scale ratings of 70 and 46, respectively). The visual analog scale ratings were higher for automated testing for 38 patients, higher for manual testing for 0 patients, and equal (tied) for 6 patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the advantage of automated testing occurred independently of practitioner experience; the advantage was significantly greater, however, for experienced patients. The rate of testing (number of settings tested per unit time) was significantly (P < 0.0001) greater for the automated system, in comparison with the rate with a human operator using traditional, manual, programming methods (mean of 0.73 settings/min versus 0.49 settings/min). The automated system also identified settings with improved estimated battery life (and corresponding anticipated cost savings). No complications were observed with automated testing; one complication (transient discomfort attributable to excessive stimulation) occurred with manual testing. CONCLUSION: Automated, patient-interactive adjustment of implanted spinal cord stimulators is significantly more effective and more efficient than traditional manual methods of adjustment. It offers not only improved clinical efficacy but also potential cost savings in extending implanted battery life. It has the additional potential advantages of standardization, quality control, and record keeping, to facilitate clinical research and patient care. It should enhance the clinical application of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic intractable pain.