Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ital J Pediatr ; 46(1): 106, 2020 Jul 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32711565

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite to PFAPA syndrome is considered a benign and self-limited condition in childhood its impact on patients and families can be remarkable in many cases. Currently, the therapeutic options for managing are non-specific and no consensus exists about the best treatment to use. Pidotimod has been suggested as a new potential treatment in PFAPA syndrome for its immunodulatory effects. We conducted a preliminary, prospective, controlled, open, cross-over trial to assess the efficacy and the safety of Pidotimod in the treatment of children with PFAPA syndrome. METHODS: 22 children with PFAPA syndrome were randomly allocated to treatment with pidotimod (with 2 vials of 400 mg daily) in combination with betamethasone 0.5-1 mg on need, based on parents/caregivers' decision (group A) or betamethasone 0.5-1 mg on need, based on parents/caregivers' decision (group B). Each treatment period was for 3 months (Phase 1), after that patients were switched to the other arm for other 3 months (Phase 2). Efficacy was expressed in terms of number of episodes of fever, pharyngitis, or aphthous stomatitis, as well as the additional use of betamethasone on need. Safety and tolerability of the Pidotimod were evaluated on the basis of the number and type of adverse events (AEs) recorded during the treatment. RESULTS: Patients receiving Pidotimod and use betametasone showed a significant decrease in frequency of fevers (p = 0.002); number of episodes of pharyngitis (p = 0.049); aphthous stomatitis (p = 0.036) as well as the betamethasone use on need (p = 0.007). Overall, 19/22 (86.4%) showed benefits from Pidotimod administration. The safety profile of Pidotimod was excellent as no serious adverse events have been reported in the treated groups. CONCLUSIONS: We firstly showed that high dosage of Pidotimod could be an effective and safe to reduce the PFAPA attacks in children.


Assuntos
Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Linfadenite/tratamento farmacológico , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Pirrolidonocarboxílico/análogos & derivados , Estomatite Aftosa/tratamento farmacológico , Tiazolidinas/administração & dosagem , Betametasona/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Cross-Over , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/complicações , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Linfadenite/complicações , Masculino , Faringite/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Ácido Pirrolidonocarboxílico/administração & dosagem , Estomatite Aftosa/complicações , Síndrome , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J ; 16(1): 46, 2018 Jul 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29996864

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Conventional pharmacological therapies for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) consist of non-biological, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, among which methotrexate (MTX) is the most commonly prescribed. However, there is a lack of consensus-based clinical and therapeutic recommendations for the use of MTX in the management of patients with JIA. Therefore, the Methotrexate Advice and RecommendAtions on Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (MARAJIA) Expert Meeting was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations for the use of MTX in the treatment of JIA. METHODS: The preliminary executive committee identified a total of 9 key clinical issues according to the population, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO) approach, and performed an evidence-based, systematic, literature review. During the subsequent Expert Meeting, the relevant evidence was assessed and graded, and 10 recommendations were made. RESULTS: Recommendations relating to the efficacy, optimal dosing and route of administration and duration of treatment with MTX in JIA, and to the issue of folic acid supplementation to prevent MTX side effects, use of MTX in the treatment of chronic JIA-associated uveitis, combination treatment with biologic agents, and the use of vaccinations in patients with JIA were developed. The selected topics were considered to represent clinically important issues facing clinicians caring for patients with JIA. Evidence was insufficient to formulate recommendations for the use of biomarkers predictive of treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: These consensus recommendations provide balanced and evidence-based recommendations designed to have broad value for physicians and healthcare clinicians involved in the clinical management of patients with JIA.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Consenso , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA