Preclinical Development of U3-1784, a Novel FGFR4 Antibody Against Cancer, and Avoidance of Its On-target Toxicity.

The FGFR4/FGF19 signaling axis is overactivated in 20% of liver tumors and currently represents a promising targetable signaling mechanism in this cancer type. However, blocking FGFR4 or FGF19 has proven challenging due to its physiological role in suppressing bile acid synthesis which leads to increased toxic bile acid plasma levels upon FGFR4 inhibition. An FGFR4-targeting antibody, U3-1784, was generated in order to investigate its suitability as a cancer treatment without major side effects.U3-1784 is a high-affinity fully human antibody that was obtained by phage display technology and specifically binds to FGFR4. The antibody inhibits cell signaling by competing with various FGFs for their FGFR4 binding site thereby inhibiting receptor activation and downstream signaling via FRS2 and Erk. The inhibitory effect on tumor growth was investigated in 10 different liver cancer models in vivo The antibody specifically slowed tumor growth of models overexpressing FGF19 by up to 90% whereas tumor growth of models not expressing FGF19 was unaffected. In cynomolgus monkeys, intravenous injection of U3-1784 caused elevated serum bile acid and liver enzyme levels indicating potential liver damage. These effects could be completely prevented by the concomitant oral treatment with the bile acid sequestrant colestyramine, which binds and eliminates bile acids in the gut. These results offer a new biomarker-driven treatment modality in liver cancer without toxicity and they suggest a general strategy for avoiding adverse events with FGFR4 inhibitors.

Phase I study of domatinostat (4SC-202), a class I histone deacetylase inhibitor in patients with advanced hematological malignancies.

OBJECTIVES: Domatinostat (4SC-202) is a selective class I histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi). This phase I study investigated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity in patients with advanced hematological malignancies. METHODS: Domatinostat was administered orally once (QD) or twice daily (BID) on days 1-14 with 7 days off or continuously days 1-21 in a 3 + 3 design at 7 dose levels from 25 to 400 mg total daily dose (TDD). Twenty-four patients were treated with domatinostat. RESULTS: No formal maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, grade 4 hypercalcemia) occurred during 200 mg BID continuous treatment. Six patients were reported with ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE; grade 3 hematological in three patients, grade 3 and grade 4 liver enzyme increase in 2 patients, grade 4 pulmonary embolism, and grade 4 hypercalcemia in one patient each). Higher grade hepatic TRAE occurred in the 200 mg BID continuous treatment cohort. Out of 24 patients, 1 achieved a complete response, 1 achieved a partial response, and 18 had stable disease as best response. CONCLUSION: Administration of domatinostat was safe, well tolerated with signs of antitumor activity. Four hundred milligram TDD in a 200 mg BID schedule (14 + 7) is the recommended phase II dose for monotherapy.