Optimising growth in very preterm infants: reviewing the evidence.

Infants born before 32 weeks' postmenstrual age are at a high risk of growth failure. International guidelines have long recommended that they match the growth of an equivalent fetus, despite the challenges posed by ex utero life and comorbidities of prematurity. Several groups have recently questioned the necessity or desirability of this target, shifting attention to aiming for growth which optimises important long-term outcomes. Specifically, recent research has identified the neurodevelopmental benefits of enhanced growth during the neonatal period, but work in term infant suggests that rapid growth may promote the metabolic syndrome in later life. In this context, defining a pattern of growth which optimises outcomes is complex, controversial and contested. Even if an optimal pattern of growth can be defined, determining the nutritional requirements to achieve such growth is not straightforward, and investigations into the nutritional needs of the very preterm infant continue. Furthermore, each infant has individual nutritional needs and may encounter a number of barriers to achieving good nutrition. This article offers a narrative review of recent evidence for the competing definitions of optimal growth in this cohort. It examines recent advances in the determination of macronutrient and micronutrient intake targets along with common barriers to achieving good nutrition and growth. Finally, key implications for clinical practice are set out and a recommendation for structured multidisciplinary management of nutrition and growth is illustrated.

Deleterious Genetic Variation Across the NOD Signaling Pathway Is Associated With Reduced NFKB Signaling Transcription and Upregulation of Alternative Inflammatory Transcripts in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease may arise with inadequate immune response to intestinal bacteria. NOD2 is an established gene in Crohn's disease pathogenesis, with deleterious variation associated with reduced NFKB signaling. We hypothesized that deleterious variation across the NOD2 signaling pathway impacts on transcription. METHODS: Treatment-naïve pediatric inflammatory bowel disease patients had ileal biopsies for targeted autoimmune RNA-sequencing and blood for whole exome sequencing collected at diagnostic endoscopy. Utilizing GenePy, a per-individual, per-gene score, genes within the NOD signaling pathway were assigned a quantitative score representing total variant burden. Where multiple genes formed complexes, GenePy scores were summed to create a "complex" score. Normalized transcript expression of 95 genes within this pathway was retrieved. Regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of genomic variation on gene transcription. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included. Limited clustering of patients based on NOD signaling transcripts was related to underlying genomic variation. Patients harboring deleterious variation in NOD2 had reduced NOD2 (ß = -0.702, P = 4.3 × 10-5) and increased NFKBIA (ß = 0.486, P = .001), reflecting reduced NFKB signal activation. Deleterious variation in the NOD2-RIPK2 complex was associated with increased NLRP3 (ß = 0.8, P = 3.1475 × 10-8) and TXN (ß = -0.417, P = 8.4 × 10-5) transcription, components of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Deleterious variation in the TAK1-TAB complex resulted in reduced MAPK14 transcription (ß = -0.677, P = 1.7 × 10-5), a key signal transduction protein in the NOD2 signaling cascade and increased IFNA1 (ß = 0.479, P = .001), indicating reduced transcription of NFKB activators and alternative interferon transcription in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Data integration identified perturbation of NOD2 signaling transcription correlated with genomic variation. A hypoimmune NFKB signaling transcription response was observed. Alternative inflammatory pathways were activated and may represent therapeutic targets in specific patients.

Functional abdominal pain: what clinicians need to know.

Abdominal pain in childhood is extremely common and presents frequently to both primary and secondary care, with many children having recurrent pain which impacts on daily functioning. Despite this most children have no discernible underlying pathology. We discuss the underlying mechanism for functional abdominal pain (visceral hypersensitivity), the evidence base linking parental anxiety and patient symptoms, and how parents can be supported in managing their children's symptoms by addressing questions commonly asked by children and families. We look at the evidence for a one-stop rational approach to investigation including a coeliac screen, inflammatory markers and consideration of stool faecal calprotectin, in the absence of red flags. We evaluate commonly used treatments for functional abdominal pain, within a context of managing family expectations. Given the limitations in pharmacological treatment options, trials of probiotics, peppermint oil, mebeverine and (for short-term use only) hyoscine butylbromide may be appropriate. Psychological interventions including cognitive-behavioural therapy, distraction techniques and hypnotherapy have a better evidence base. There is also some evidence for other complementary therapies in children, including yoga and neurostimulation. Outcome is generally good providing there is child and family acceptance of the multiple factors implicated in the aetiology of the pain.

Improving growth of infants with congenital heart disease using a consensus-based nutritional pathway.

OBJECTIVE: Infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) often experience growth failure prior to surgery, which is associated with increased paediatric-intensive-care unit length of stay (PICU-LOS) and post-operative complications. This study assessed the impact of a pre-operative, consensus-based nutritional pathway (including support from a multi-disciplinary team) on growth and clinical outcome. DESIGN: Single-centre prospective pilot study. SETTING: Tertiary paediatric cardiology surgical centre. PATIENTS: Infants with CHD. INTERVENTION: Infants with CHD were followed for up to 4-months-of-age before cardiac surgery and then to 12-months-of-age following the implementation of the consensus-based nutritional-pathway (Intervention group: November 2017-August 2018), with outcomes compared to a historic control group. The nutrition pathway involved a dietitian contacting parents of infants with the highest risk of growth failure weekly; reviewing weight gain and providing feeding support. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Growth (weight-for-age, WAZ, and height-for-age-z-score, HAZ) at 4 and 12 months-of-age. RESULTS: 44 infants in the intervention group were compared to 38 in the control group. Median (inter quartile range) change in WAZ from birth to 4 months-of-age (-0.9 (-1.5, 0.7)) and from birth to 12 months-of-age (-0.09 (-1.3, 1.1)) in the intervention group compared to the control group (-1.5 (-2.0, -0.4) (p = 0.04)) at 4 months-of age and at 12 months-of-age (-0.4 (1.9, 0.2) (p = 0.03)). HAZ at 4 months-of-age was -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1) vs. -1.0 (-1.9, -0.3) (p = 0.6) in the intervention and control groups respectively, and at 12 months-of-age HAZ was -0.7 (-1.9, -0.07) in the intervention group vs.-1.6 (-2.6, -0.4) in the control group (p = 0.04). Duration of PICU-LOS was 8.2 ± 11.6 days intervention vs. 18.3 ± 24.0 days control (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Overall weight was well maintained and growth improved in infants who followed the pre-operative nutritional-pathway. The duration of PICU-LOS was significantly lower in the intervention group, which may be due to improved nutritional status, although this requires further investigation.

Pharmacological treatment of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is a common disorder, characterised by regurgitation of gastric contents into the oesophagus. GOR is a very common presentation in infancy in both primary and secondary care settings. GOR can affect approximately 50% of infants younger than three months old (Nelson 1997). The natural history of GOR in infancy is generally that of a functional, self-limiting condition that improves with age; < 5% of children with vomiting or regurgitation continue to have symptoms after infancy (Martin 2002). Older children and children with co-existing medical conditions can have a more protracted course. The definition of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and its precise distinction from GOR are debated, but consensus guidelines from the North American Society of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN-ESPGHAN guidelines 2009) define GORD as 'troublesome symptoms or complications of GOR.' OBJECTIVES: This Cochrane review aims to provide a robust analysis of currently available pharmacological interventions used to treat children with GOR by assessing all outcomes indicating benefit or harm. SEARCH METHODS: We sought to identify relevant published trials by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2014, Issue 5), MEDLINE and EMBASE (1966 to 2014), the Centralised Information Service for Complementary Medicine (CISCOM), the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Science Citation Index (on BIDS-UK General Science Index) and the ISI Web of Science. We also searched for ongoing trials in the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com).Reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching were handsearched for relevant paediatric studies on medical treatment of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux, as were published abstracts from conference proceedings (published in Gut and Gastroenterology) and reviews published over the past five years.No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Abstracts were reviewed by two review authors, and relevant RCTs on study participants (birth to 16 years) with GOR receiving a pharmacological treatment were selected. Subgroup analysis was considered for children up to 12 months of age, and for children 12 months to 16 years of age, and for those with neurological impairment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trials were critically appraised and data collected by two review authors. Risk of bias was assessed. Meta-analysis data were independently extracted by two review authors, and suitable outcome data were analysed using RevMan. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 24 studies (1201 participants) contributed data to the review. The review authors had several concerns regarding the studies. Pharmaceutical company support for manuscript preparation was a common feature; also, because common endpoints were lacking, study populations were heterogenous and variations in study design were noted, individual drug meta-analysis was not possible.Moderate-quality evidence from individual studies suggests that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can reduce GOR symptoms in children with confirmed erosive oesophagitis. It was not possible to demonstrate statistical superiority of one PPI agent over another.Some evidence indicates that H2antagonists are effective in treating children with GORD. Methodological differences precluded performance of meta-analysis on individual agents or on these agents as a class, in comparison with placebo or head-to-head versus PPIs, and additional studies are required.RCT evidence is insufficient to permit assessment of the efficacy of prokinetics. Given the diversity of study designs and the heterogeneity of outcomes, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of the efficacy of domperidone.In younger children, the largest RCT of 80 children (one to 18 months of age) with GOR showed no evidence of improvement in symptoms and 24-hour pH probe, but improvement in symptoms and reflux index was noted in a subgroup treated with domperidone and co-magaldrox(Maalox(®) ). In another RCT of 17 children, after eight weeks of therapy. 33% of participants treated with domperidone noted an improvement in symptoms (P value was not significant). In neonates, the evidence is even weaker; one RCT of 26 neonates treated with domperidone over 24 hours showed that although reflux frequency was significantly increased, reflux duration was significantly improved.Diversity of RCT evidence was found regarding efficacy of compound alginate preparations(Gaviscon Infant(®) ) in infants, although as a result of these studies, Gaviscon Infant(®) was changed to become aluminium-free and has been assessed in its current form in only two studies since 1999. Given the diversity of study designs and the heterogeneity of outcomes, as well as the evolution in formulation, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis on the efficacy of Gaviscon Infant(®) . Moderate evidence indicates that Gaviscon Infant(®) improves symptoms in infants, including those with functional reflux; the largest study of the current formulation showed improvement in symptom control but was limited by length of follow-up.No serious side effects were reported.No RCTs on pharmacological treatments for children with neurodisability were identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate evidence was found to support the use of PPIs, along with some evidence to support the use of H2 antagonists in older children with GORD, based on improvement in symptom scores, pH indices and endoscopic/histological appearances. However, lack of independent placebo-controlled and head-to-head trials makes conclusions as to relative efficacy difficult to determine. Further RCTs are recommended. No robust RCT evidence is available to support the use of domperidone, and further studies on prokinetics are recommended, including assessments of erythromycin.Pharmacological treatment of infants with reflux symptoms is problematic, as many infants have GOR, and little correlation has been noted between reported symptoms and endoscopic and pH findings. Better evidence has been found to support the use of PPIs in infants with GORD, but heterogeneity in outcomes and in study design impairs interpretation of placebo-controlled data regarding efficacy. Some evidence is available to support the use of Gaviscon Infant(®) , but further studies with longer follow-up times are recommended. Studies of omeprazole and lansoprazole in infants with functional GOR have demonstrated variable benefit, probably because of differences in inclusion criteria.No robust RCT evidence has been found regarding treatment of preterm babies with GOR/GORD or children with neurodisabilities. Initiation of RCTs with common endpoints is recommended, given the frequency of treatment and the use of multiple antireflux agents in these children.