Preliminary descriptions of transient-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions from graduates of an intensive care nursery.

Transient-evoked (TEOAE) and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) were measured in 51 graduates of an intensive care nursery and compared to data obtained from 80 normal-hearing children and adults. All infants had click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR) at 30 dB nHL or less while the older subjects had pure-tone thresholds of 20 dB HL or less for octave frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz. OAE data were collected using commercially available devices. All data were analyzed in terms of emission amplitude, emission-to-noise ratio, and response reproducibility as a function of frequency. DPOAEs were measured at three points per octave between f2 frequencies of approximately 500 and 8000 Hz. TEOAEs were elicited by clicks and were analyzed in both octave and 1/3-octave bands centered at frequencies from 500 to 4000 Hz, as well as in the broadband condition. In addition, stimulus amplitudes for the clicks used to elicit TEOAEs were analyzed within octave and 1/3-octave bands to determine whether any age-related differences in responses can be accounted for on the basis of stimulus differences. Both emission amplitude and noise amplitude were greater in neonates than adults, although there was variability across frequency. Emission-to-noise ratio and response reproducibility were more similar between groups. For TEOAEs, high-frequency emission-to-noise ratios were larger in neonates compared to older subjects, while the reverse was true in the lower frequencies. Less obvious frequency effects were observed for DPOAEs. These findings are discussed in relation to the potential use of OAEs as screening measures for neonatal hearing loss.

A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

The ability of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) to distinguish normal hearing from hearing impairment was evaluated in 180 subjects. TEOAEs were analyzed into octave or one-third octave bands for frequencies ranging from 500 to 4000 Hz. Decision theory was used to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each of three measurements (OAE amplitude, OAE/noise, reproducibility) for each OAE measure (octave TEOAEs, 1/3 octave TEOAEs, DPOAEs), for octave frequencies from 500 to 4000 Hz, and for seven audiometric criteria ranging from 10 to 40 dB HL. At 500 Hz, TEOAEs and DPOAEs were unable to separate normal from impaired ears. At 1000 Hz, both TEOAE measures were more accurate in identifying hearing status than DPOAEs. At 2000 Hz, all OAE measures performed equally well. At 4000 Hz, DPOAEs were better able to distinguish normal from impaired ears. Almost without exception, measurements of OAE/noise and reproducibility performed comparably and were superior to measurements of OAE amplitude, although the differences were small. TEOAEs analyzed into octave bands showed better performance than TEOAEs analyzed into 1/3 octaves. Under standard test conditions, OAE test performance appears to be limited by background noise, especially for the low frequencies.

Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses.

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) were measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human subjects. Analyses based on decision theory were used to evaluate DPOAE test performance. Specifically, relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and the areas under these curves were used to estimate the extent to which normal and impaired ears could be correctly identified by these measures. DPOAE amplitude and DPOAE/noise measurements were able to distinguish between normal and impaired subjects at 4000, 8000, and, to a lesser extent, at 2000 Hz. The ability of these measures to distinguish between groups decreased, however, as frequency and audiometric criterion used to separate normal and hearing-impaired ears decreased. At 500 Hz, performance was no better than chance, regardless of the audiometric criterion for normal hearing. Cumulative distributions of misses (hearing-impaired ears incorrectly identified as normal hearing) and false alarms (normal-hearing ears identified as hearing impaired) were constructed and used to evaluate test performance for a range of hit rates (i.e., the percentage of correctly identified hearing-impaired ears). Depending on the desired hit rate, criterion values of -5 to -12 dB SPL for DPOAE amplitudes and 8 to 15 dB for DPOAE/noise accurately distinguished normal-hearing ears from those with thresholds greater than 20 dB HL for the two frequencies at which performance was best (4000 and 8000 Hz). It would appear that DPOAE measurements can be used to accurately identify the presence of high-frequency hearing loss, but are not accurate predictors of hearing status at lower frequencies, at least for the conditions of the present measurements.

A comparison of auditory brain stem response thresholds and latencies elicited by air- and bone-conducted stimuli.

Auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) were measured for stimuli presented both by air conduction and by bone conduction. Stimuli included clicks and tone bursts at octave frequencies from 250 to 4000 Hz. ABR thresholds were comparable for air- and bone-conducted stimuli. Wave V latencies were longer for bone-conducted stimuli compared to similar responses for air conduction. This effect was evident for both clicks and tone bursts. The fact that these latency differences were largely independent of stimulus spectrum suggests that they are not due to differences between the frequency responses of air and bone conduction transducers. This finding is expected when one considers the interaction between output, threshold, and frequency for both transducer types. These data also suggest that there are inherent differences in transmission by air and bone conduction that affect response latency but are unrelated to the amplitude spectrum in the signal.

Auditory brainstem responses elicited by 1000-Hz tone bursts in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.

Auditory brainstem responses were measured in response to 1000-Hz tone bursts from 115 patients with sensorineural hearing loss, presumably of cochlear origin. Mean wave V latencies and variability were comparable to those observed in normal hearing subjects for similar stimuli. The range of interaural differences in wave V latencies for 1000-Hz tone bursts were slightly greater than those observed for clicks, which may not be surprising, given the greater variability in wave V latencies for tonal stimulation, even in normal-hearing subjects. These differences, however, were not affected either by the magnitude or symmetry of hearing loss for frequencies at and above 1000 Hz. These data suggest that tone burst ABRs might be useful in otoneurologic evaluations, especially for patients with asymmetric hearing loss.

Effects of stimulus phase on the latency of the auditory brainstem response.

Auditory brainstem responses were measured in five normal-hearing subjects, using single-cycle sinusoids at octave frequencies ranging from 250 to 2000 Hz. These sinusoids, gated with Blackman functions, were presented either at 0 or 180 degree phase and were varied in level from 90 dB SPL to threshold in 10-dB steps. Stimulus phase affected wave V latencies for low-frequency stimuli, with the effect decreasing as frequency increased. These data are thought to represent an evoked potential manifestation of known phase-locking abilities within the auditory system.