Retrospective evaluation of the safety of low-level laser therapy/photobiomodulation in patients with head/neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The standard therapeutic approach for locally advanced head and neck cancer is optimal use of radiation therapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy. The most common and distressing acute complication of such therapies is oral/pharyngeal mucositis that may be associated with severe morbidity and can interfere with the planned administration of therapy. METHODS: We have identified all patients diagnosed with head/neck cancer between 2005 and 2009, having received radiotherapy with or without cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Radiotherapy consisted of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in all patients. In patients with grade > 2 mucositis, photobiomodulation (PBM) consisted of three sessions of low-level laser irradiation weekly, in accordance with recently published recommendations for PBM. Patients who did not receive PBM were those for whom that approach was not requested by the radiotherapists and those who declined it. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients (62%) received PBM and 139 did not (39%). The patient's characteristics were equally distributed between the two groups. For overall survival, time to local recurrence, and progression-free survival, there was no statistical evidence for a difference in prognosis between patients with and without PBM. In a multivariate analysis, after adjusting for known prognostic factors, we found no statistical evidence that PBM was related to overall survival, progression-free survival, or local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show evidence of no effect of PBM upon overall survival, time to local recurrences, and disease-free survival of patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy with/without chemotherapy.

Phase III trial comparing two dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare a full-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (HEC) regimen with classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) therapy and with a moderate-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen (EC) in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Node-positive breast cancer patients who were aged 70 years or younger were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: CMF for six cycles (oral cyclophosphamide); EC for eight cycles (epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2); day 1 every 3 weeks); and HEC for eight cycles (epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 830 mg/m(2); day 1 every 3 weeks). RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-five, 267, and 255 eligible patients were treated with CMF, EC, and HEC, respectively. Patient characteristics were well balanced among the three arms. One and three cases of congestive heart failure were reported in the EC and HEC arms, respectively. Three cases of acute myeloid leukemia were reported in the HEC arm. After 4 years of median follow-up, no statistically significant differences were observed between HEC and CMF (event-free survival [EFS]: hazards ratio [HR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.31, P =.80; distant-EFS: HR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.34, P =.87; overall survival [OS]: HR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.44, P =.87). HEC is more effective than EC (EFS: HR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99, P =.04; distant-EFS: HR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02, P =.06; OS HR = 0.69, 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.00, P =.05). CONCLUSION: This three-arm study does not show an advantage in favor of an adequately dosed epirubicin-based regimen over classical CMF in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive pre- and postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Moreover, this study confirms that there is a dose-response curve for epirubicin in breast cancer adjuvant therapy.