RESUMO
We measured carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lungs (DL,CO) by both the resting single-breath (SB) and steady-state (SS) exercise methods in 95 patients referred for pulmonary function testing. A 10-second breath-holding method was used for the SB test. DL,CO (SS) was measured during the last minute of a 3-minute exercise test on a 9-inch step. Results of the two methods showed good agreement, the SB-SS difference averaging -0.70 (SD, 3.39) ml/min per mm Hg. The difference between the two methods was not correlated with other measurements of pulmonary function except minute ventilation during the exercise performed in the DL,CO (SS) procedure. In a separate study of laboratory personnel, the day-to-day variabilities of the two tests were similar (SD, 1.4 ml/min per mm Hg). Alveolar volume obtained by helium dilution during the SB test was comparable to total lung capacity (TLC) estimated by multiple-breath nitrogen washout in patients without severe airway obstruction. In severe airway obstruction, the mean SB alveolar volume was 13.8% less than the TLC by nitrogen washout, a difference that may be useful as an indicator of inefficiency of gas mixing in the lungs. We conclude that the SB and SS exercise methods provide similar estimates of DL,CO in patients referred to a pulmonary function laboratory.
Assuntos
Exercícios Respiratórios , Monóxido de Carbono/fisiologia , Capacidade de Difusão Pulmonar , Adulto , Idoso , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Feminino , Fluxo Expiratório Forçado , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Pulmão/fisiologia , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Capacidade Pulmonar Total , Capacidade VitalRESUMO
The effects of enflurane, isoflurane, vecuronium, atracurium, and pancuronium on pulmonary resistance and heart rate were studied in 30 vagotomized dogs lying supine and anesthetized with chloralose-urethane. None of the five drugs affected pulmonary resistance when the airway was unstimulated. Enflurane and isoflurane significantly attenuated the increase in pulmonary resistance induced by electrical stimulation of the vagus nerves. This effect was dose-dependent and similar for both anesthetics at equivalent multiples of their minimum alveolar concentration. Atracurium significantly (P less than 0.05) enhanced the increase in pulmonary resistance induced by vagus nerve stimulation; vecuronium had no significant effect. Pancuronium, up to a cumulative dose of 0.14 mg/kg, also significantly (P less than 0.05) enhanced the increase in pulmonary resistance induced by vagus nerve stimulation; but this effect was reversed by further increasing the dose. Pancuronium also attenuated the cardiodecelerator response to vagus nerve stimulation in a dose-dependent fashion. The underlying mechanisms for the attenuation of responses to vagus nerve stimulation by enflurane or isoflurane or for the increase in response with atracurium are unknown. Pancuronium at lower doses increases the response most likely by blocking prejunctional muscarinic receptors (M2) that physiologically inhibit vagally mediated increases in pulmonary resistance.