Reliable identification of cardiac liability in drug discovery using automated patch clamp: Benchmarking best practices and calibration standards for improved proarrhythmic assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Screening compounds for activity on the hERG channel using patch clamp is a crucial part of safety testing. Automated patch clamp (APC) is becoming widely accepted as an alternative to manual patch clamp in order to increase throughput whilst maintaining data quality. In order to standardize APC experiments, we have investigated the effects on IC50 values under different conditions using several devices across multiple sites. METHODS: APC instruments SyncroPatch 384i, SyncroPatch 384PE and Patchliner, were used to record hERG expressed in HEK or CHO cells. Up to 27 CiPA compounds were used to investigate effects of voltage protocol, incubation time, labware and time between compound preparation and experiment on IC50 values. RESULTS: All IC50 values of 21 compounds recorded on the SyncroPatch 384PE correlated well with IC50 values from the literature (Kramer et al., 2013) regardless of voltage protocol or labware, when compounds were used immediately after preparation, but potency of astemizole decreased if prepared in Teflon or polypropylene (PP) compound plates 2-3 h prior to experiments. Slow acting compounds such as dofetilide, astemizole, and terfenadine required extended incubation times of at least 6 min to reach steady state and therefore, stable IC50 values. DISCUSSION: Assessing the influence of different experimental conditions on hERG assay reliability, we conclude that either the step-ramp protocol recommended by CiPA or a standard 2-s step-pulse protocol can be used to record hERG; a minimum incubation time of 5 min should be used and although glass, Teflon, PP or polystyrene (PS) compound plates can be used for experiments, caution should be taken if using Teflon, PS or PP vessels as some adsorption can occur if experiments are not performed immediately after preparation. Our recommendations are not limited to the APC devices described in this report, but could also be extended to other APC devices.

A general procedure to select calibration drugs for lab-specific validation and calibration of proarrhythmia risk prediction models: An illustrative example using the CiPA model.

INTRODUCTION: In response to the ongoing shift of the regulatory cardiac safety paradigm, a recent White Paper proposed general principles for developing and implementing proarrhythmia risk prediction models. These principles included development strategies to validate models, and implementation strategies to ensure a model developed by one lab can be used by other labs in a consistent manner in the presence of lab-to-lab experimental variability. While the development strategies were illustrated through the validation of the model under the Comprehensive In vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA), the implementation strategies have not been adopted yet. METHODS: The proposed implementation strategies were applied to the CiPA model by performing a sensitivity analysis to identify a subset of calibration drugs that were most critical in determining the classification thresholds for proarrhythmia risk prediction. RESULTS: The selected calibration drugs were able to recapitulate classification thresholds close to those calculated from the full list of CiPA drugs. Using an illustrative dataset it was shown that a new lab could use these calibration drugs to establish its own classification thresholds (lab-specific calibration), and verify that the model prediction accuracy in the new lab is comparable to that in the original lab where the model was developed (lab-specific validation). DISCUSSION: This work used the CiPA model as an example to illustrate how to adopt the proposed model implementation strategies to select calibration drugs and perform lab-specific calibration and lab-specific validation. Generic in nature, these strategies could be generally applied to different proarrhythmia risk prediction models using various experimental systems under the new paradigm.