Three Distraction Methods for Pain Reduction During Cystoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effects on Pain, Anxiety, and Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Cystoscopy is a safe diagnostic procedure commonly used to evaluate lower urinary tract symptoms. This can cause pain, anxiety, and dissatisfaction in patients undergoing cystoscopy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects on pain, anxiety, and satisfaction of distraction methods used during cystoscopy. DESIGN: Single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial. SETTING: Cystoscopy unit of a training and research hospital in Turkey. PARTICIPANTS: Male patients ≥18 years of age who underwent rigid cystoscopy for the first time. METHODS: A total of 120 male patients were recruited and randomized into four groups as music, stress ball, video, and control group. Data were collected using visual analog scale for pain and satisfaction, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for anxiety, and hemodynamic parameters. The primary outcome was the difference with respect to pain scores among intervention groups. Other outcome measures were anxiety and satisfaction scores. RESULTS: Pain severity during cystoscopy was found to be significantly lower in the intervention groups than the control group. In the video group, the severity of pain during cystoscopy was also found to be significantly lower than music and stress ball groups (p = 0.006, p < 0.001). After cystoscopy, anxiety levels were significantly lower and satisfaction levels were significantly higher in the intervention groups than in the control group. Anxiety levels were significantly lower in the video group than music and stress ball groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Satisfaction levels were also significantly higher after cystoscopy in the video group than in the music and stress ball groups (p = 0.018, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, distraction methods used during rigid cystoscopy were found to have a reducing effect on pain, anxiety, and dissatisfaction. As the results of the study are evaluated, video should be recommended to be the first preferred distraction method during rigid cystoscopy.

Comparison of Two Different Distraction Methods Affecting the Level of Pain and Anxiety during Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy can cause pain and anxiety for patients. Despite the use of many distraction methods to reduce pain and anxiety, there is no study on the use of stress balls during lithotripsy. AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of use of stress balls and music therapy to reduce pain and anxiety during lithotripsy. DESIGN: This was a single-center, parallel randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: The study involved the lithotripsy unit in a training and research hospital in Turkey. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 120 patients who had kidney or ureter stones. METHODS: The patients were randomly divided into three groups. The control group (group 1) received no interference, whereas experimental groups received stress ball (group 2) and music (group 3) interventions during lithotripsy, respectively. Data were collected using the Patient Information Form, visual analog scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups in regard to anxiety and pain mean scores (p > .05). No statistically significant difference was found between anxiety scores before and after lithotripsy in each group (p > .05), whereas there was a statistically significant difference between pain scores during and after lithotripsy (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Based on the present study, no statistically significant difference was found between the use of stress balls and music in reducing pain and anxiety during lithotripsy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of stress balls used during lithotripsy.

Pain scores and local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal pathologies.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present randomized study was to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine gel compared with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) with lidocaine for transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal pathologies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group 1 was given 10 mL of 2% lidocaine gel intrarectally 10 minutes before the biopsy. Group 2 was given 10 mL of intrarectal 40% DMSO with an amount of lidocaine equal to that in the lidocaine gel 10 minutes before the procedure. The degree of pain was rated by patients using a 10-point visual analog scale. RESULTS: The pain scores for probe insertion were significantly lower for group 2 (3.15 +/- 1.41) than for group 1 (4.58 +/- 160) (P = 0.01). No significant differences were found between the pain scores of the two groups for biopsy-needle insertion (P = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Dimethylsulfoxide with lidocaine instilled into the rectum is a simple, safe, rapid-acting, and effective method of anesthesia delivery before TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal pathologies.

Comparing two local anesthesia techniques for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream compared with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) with lidocaine during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in a prospective randomized study. METHODS: Of 167 patients, 85 received 10 g of EMLA cream (EMLA group) and 82 received 10 g of 40% DMSO (DMSO group) with an amount of lidocaine equal to that in the lidocaine gel, applied to the skin of the flank at the area of entry of the shock wave marked by the urologist. A second-generation lithotriptor Siemens Lithostar was used. The degree of pain was rated by the patients using a 10-point visual analog scale. RESULTS: In 80 patients in the EMLA group (94%), the entire procedure was performed with no, minor, or tolerable pain after the application of EMLA cream (pain score 5.2 +/- 1.3). In 5 EMLA patients (6%), EWSL was interrupted because of intolerable pain. Of the 82 DMSO patients, 80 (98%) underwent the entire procedure with no, minor, or tolerable pain after the application of DMSO with lidocaine (pain score 3.7 +/- 1.1). In 2 DMSO patients (2%), EWSL was interrupted because of intolerable pain. The pain scores were significantly lower for the DMSO group than for the EMLA group (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have indicated that the pain scores were significantly lower for the DMSO group than for the EMLA group. In addition to the local anesthetic effect of DMSO, diuretic, anti-inflammatory, muscle relaxant, and hydroxyl radical scavenger effects can be important for patients undergoing ESWL. These effects should be evaluated with new studies of patients undergoing ESWL.

Intraurethral prostatic cyst: a rare cause of infravesical obstruction.

A case is reported here of symptomatic intraurethral anterior midline prostatic cyst in a 52-year-old man whom transurethral resection of the cyst was performed successfully establishing the resolution of voiding symptoms.