Higher dose and dose-rate in smaller tumors result in improved tumor control.

Small tumors are more sensitive to radioimmunotherapy (RIT) than larger ones. A greater proportion of viable radiosensitive areas in small tumors, higher antibody uptake, and radiation dose may be responsible. Six groups of mice with small (median tumor size 0.06 cm3) or large LoVo xenografts (median tumor size 0.38 cm3) received either RIT using a 131I-labeled anti-CEA antibody A5B7, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated with folinic acid (FA), or no treatment. The % injected activity/gram, antibody distribution in viable and necrotic areas, and dose distribution were determined. High-power microscopy images of the original section were reconstructed to estimate the proportion of viable areas. Mice with small and large tumors grew significantly less rapidly when treated with RIT compared to the control group (p < 0.0004 and p < 0.003, respectively), while 5-FU was ineffective. Small tumors treated with RIT grew less than large tumors (p < 0.02). A higher amount of % injected activity/gram of tumor (median 26.6% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.0007) and a higher dose-rate were found in small tumors at 24 hours post injection (viable areas: 56.2 +/- 23.7 vs. 13.3 +/- 7 cGy/h, necrosis 19.2 +/- 16.3 vs. 4.9 +/- 4.7 cGy/h, p = 0.0007). It appears that as viable tumor masses grow the access to them decreases and this has a fourfold effect on dose delivered for RIT in this example. These data support the consideration of use of RIT for adjuvant treatment in colon cancer.

Eradication of colorectal xenografts by combined radioimmunotherapy and combretastatin a-4 3-O-phosphate.

Solid tumors have a heterogeneous pathophysiology, which has a major impact on therapy. Using SW1222 colorectal xenografts grown in nude mice, we have shown that antibody-targeted radioimmunotherapy (RIT) effectively treated the well-perfused tumor rim, producing regressions for approximately 35 days, but was less effective at the more hypoxic center. By 72 h after RIT, the number of apoptotic cells rose from an overall value of 1% in untreated tumors to 35% at the tumor periphery and 10% at the center. The antivascular agent disodium combretastatin A-4 3-O-phosphate (CA4-P) rapidly reduced tumor blood flow to 62% of control values by 1 h, 23% by 3 h, and between 32-36% from 6 to 24 h after administration. This created central hemorrhagic necrosis, but a peripheral rim of cells continued to grow, and survival was unaffected. Changes in the pattern of perfusion across the tumor over time were zonal. Untreated mice showed perfusion throughout the tumor, with greatest activity at the rim. There was an overall reduction at 1 h, and total cessation of central perfusion from 3 h onward. A narrow peripheral rim of perfusion was always present, which increased in intensity and extent between 6 and 24 h, either through reperfusion or new vessel growth. Combining these two complementary therapies (7.4 MBq (131)I-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen IgG i.v. plus a single 200 mg/kg dose of CA4-P i.p.) produced complete cures in five of six mice for >9 months. Allowing maximal tumor localization of antibody (48 h) before blood flow inhibition by CA4-P increased tumor retention by two to three times control levels by 96 h without altering normal tissue levels, as confirmed by gamma counting and phosphor image analysis. The success of this combined, synergistic therapy was probably the result of several factors: (a) the killing of tumor cells in the outer, radiosensitive region by targeted radiotherapy; (b) enhancement of RIT by entrapment of additional radioantibody after combretastatin-induced vessel collapse; and (c) destruction of the central, more hypoxic and radioresistant region by CA4-P. This work demonstrates the need to consider cancer treatment in a biologically heterogeneous setting, if results are to be effectively translated to the clinic.

Enhancement of antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy in colorectal xenografts by an antivascular agent.

The irregular nature of solid tumor vasculature produces a heterogeneous distribution of antibody-targeted therapies within the tumor mass, which frequently results in reduced therapeutic efficacy. We have, therefore, combined two complementary therapies: Antibody-directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy (ADEPT), which targets tumor cells, and an agent that selectively destroys tumor vasculature. A single i.p. dose (27.5 mg/kg) of the drug 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA), given to nude mice bearing the LS174T colorectal xenograft, destroyed all but a peripheral rim of tumor cells, without enhancing survival. The ADEPT system, in which a pretargeted enzyme activates a prodrug, consisted of the F(ab')2 fragment of anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody A5B7 conjugated to the bacterial enzyme carboxypeptidase G2 and the prodrug 4-[(2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl)amino]benzoyl-L-glutamic acid, which was given i.p. in three doses of 500 mg/kg at 72, 84, and 96 h post-conjugate administration (25 units of carboxypeptidase G2). The antibody-enzyme conjugate could be selectively retained at approximately twice the control levels by administration of the antivascular agent at the time of optimal conjugate localization within the tumor (20 h post-conjugate administration), as demonstrated by gamma counting, phosphor plate image analysis, and active enzyme measurement. This resulted in significantly enhanced tumor growth inhibition in groups of six mice, compared to conventional ADEPT therapy, with no concomitant increase in systemic toxicity. In a separate experiment, aimed at trapping the prodrug within the tumor, a 16-fold increase over control values was produced (means, 44.8 versus 2.8 microg/g tumor) when DMXAA was given 4 h prior to 4-[(2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl)amino]benzoyl-L-glutamic acid. The therapeutic window was small, with no significant enhancement of prodrug retention when DMXAA was given at either earlier or later time points. This correlated with the time of vascular shut-down induced by the antivascular agent. We are currently investigating whether it is more advantageous to trap increased levels of conjugate or prodrug within the tumor for maximal enhancement of conventional ADEPT. These studies demonstrate that combined use of antibody-directed and antivascular therapies can significantly benefit the therapeutic outcome of either strategy alone.

In vitro assessment of Lipiodol-targeted radiotherapy for liver and colorectal cancer cell lines.

Intra-arterial Lipiodol has been used to deliver targeted therapies to primary, and some metastatic, liver cancers. Targeted radiotherapy has been used by substituting the iodine in Lipiodol with 131Iodine (131I). Early clinical results are encouraging, but the variable response may partly depend on local pharmacokinetics. This study evaluated the in vitro cytotoxic effects of 131I-Lipiodol on human hepatocellular carcinoma (Hep-G2), human colorectal metastatic cancer (SW620), human colorectal hepatic cancer (LoVo) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) cell lines. The cell cultures were exposed to 131I-Lipiodol for 48 h, following which cell counts and viability were assessed by haemocytometer, S-Rhodamine uptake and radioactivity assay. The effect of exposure to control Lipiodol, 131I-Lipiodol and 131I alone was evaluated. 131I-Lipiodol was cytotoxic against all the cancer cell lines but not against the non-malignant (HUVEC) cell line. The cytotoxicity effects were very similar in all the cancer cell lines. There were no cytotoxic effects following exposure to plain 131I in any of the cell lines (malignant and non-malignant). A similar trend was seen with radioactivity counts using a gamma counter. The cytotoxic effect of 131I-Lipiodol had a graded effect with an increase in cytotoxicity following the increase in the radioactive dose. This study showed that there was a marked cytotoxic effect by 131I-Lipiodol on all the cancer cell lines. There was no difference between the controls and the 131Iodine. This suggests that effective 131I-Lipiodol targeted therapy is dependent on the uptake and retention of Lipiodol by malignant cells.

Ablation of colorectal xenografts with combined radioimmunotherapy and tumor blood flow-modifying agents.

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) does not readily eradicate common solid tumors and therefore requires augmentation by complementary therapies that do not increase normal tissue damage. We have examined the efficacy of RIT combined with 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA), a drug which induces immunomodulation and cytokine production and preferentially reduces tumor blood flow, using a colorectal xenograft model in nude mice. Although an optimal i.p. dose (27.5 mg/kg) of drug alone induced massive hemorrhagic necrosis of all but a thin peripheral rim of viable tumor cells, survival was unaffected. However, when combined with i.v. 18.5 MBq 131I-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen IgG, DMXAA significantly potentiated the RIT without increased toxicity, with five of six mice showing complete cures. Scheduling was critical because the antibody must be allowed to reach maximum tumor accumulation before initiation of drug-induced blood flow inhibition. Subsequently, the antibody was retained preferentially in the tumor, reaching approximately twice control levels by 5 days after drug delivery. In combined studies, the drug had a narrow therapeutic window, 30 mg/kg being toxic to two of six mice, whereas 20 mg/kg were ineffective. However, the addition of a second vasoactive agent, serotonin, to RIT plus 20 mg/kg DMXAA enhanced therapy without increasing systemic toxicity. Tumor histology and phosphor image plate analysis reflected these results. When given without RIT, the two drugs combined, although not alone, also significantly inhibited tumor growth. Drug-induced tumor necrosis and tumor retention of radioantibody may both contribute to the enhanced RIT produced by this combined complementary therapy.

Clinical value of imaging using antibody to alpha fetoprotein in germ cell tumours.

Germ cell tumours (GCT) producing alpha fetoprotein (aFP) can be imaged by external scintigraphy after intravenous administration of radiolabelled antibody directed against aFP. Antibody imaging (AI) by this method was used in an attempt to guide surgical resection of deposits of drug-resistant or recurrent GCT. 30 patients with GCT and raised aFP in whom site of tumour was not known were investigated by AI and conventional imaging methods. All but one were heavily pretreated. Where tumour appeared localised, resection was attempted. Tumour was found in all sites positive by both AI and conventional imaging. AI produced false-positive results in one of 30 patients and false-negative results in 9 patients. Computerised tomography was false-positive in one case and false-negative in three. In these patients, AI gave true-negative and true-positive results, respectively. Of 11 patients with positive AI in whom resection was attempted, 6 achieved sustained complete response with up to 5 years follow-up. We conclude AI and conventional imaging methods to be complementary in selection for surgery of patients with drug-resistant or recurrent GCT.

Use of second antibody in radioimmunotherapy.

In this study, a second antibody was directed against the first antitumor antibody to accelerate clearance of the 131I-labeled first antibody and improve tumor to normal tissue ratios of radioactivity. The value of this method in improving the therapeutic index of radioimmunotherapy with 131I-antibody to CEA has been investigated in nude mice bearing xenografts of human colon carcinoma and in 5 patients with colorectal cancer. The xenografts did not become saturated with anti-CEA as the administered dose was increased to therapeutic levels. At these high dose levels, the second antibody increased tumor to blood ratios to a maximum of 155:1, 48 times the level in controls that did not receive the second antibody. In 5 patients given 50 mCi of anti-CEA, there was no significant toxicity with the second antibody; clearance of radioactivity was accelerated; and tumor imaging was enhanced. The second antibody appears to have the potential to improve the therapeutic index of radioimmunotherapy.

Prophylaxis against hypomagnesaemia induced by cis-platinum combination chemotherapy.

Hypomagnesaemia is recognised as a feature of the renal tubular defect produced by cis-platinum therapy for cancer. It may be sufficiently severe to cause tetany and grand mal fits. Attempts to correct established hypomagnesaemia whilst continuing cis-platinum therapy have not proved satisfactory. We have therefore investigated the prophylactic addition of 3 g magnesium sulphate to the high-dose platinum regimen with which metastatic malignant teratoma is treated in this unit. Serum magnesium levels have been measured in eight patients treated in this way and compared with those recorded for eight matched patients previously treated without routine magnesium supplements. Magnesium levels fell into the range frequently associated with clinical manifestation in five of the eight unsupplemented patients and only one of those given magnesium prophylactically. Mean serum magnesium levels were significantly higher in the supplemented group when compared using the paired t-test (P less than 0.01). Routine supplementation with intravenous magnesium sulphate is a simple and effective way of preventing symptomatic hypomagnesaemia associated with cis-platinum therapy.