Comparison of different treatment protocols in the treatment of idiopathic detrusor overactivity: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the effectiveness of various treatment protocols for the treatment of women with idiopathic detrusor overactivity. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Departments of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hacettepe University. SUBJECTS: Forty-six subjects were randomized to three groups. INTERVENTIONS: The first group received only pharmacotherapy, the second group received only physiotherapy and in the third group pharmacotherapy was combined with physiotherapy (combined therapy group). MAIN MEASURES: All patients were evaluated at the beginning and at the end of treatment. Assessment parameters were maximum cystometric capacity, electromyographic activity of pelvic floor muscles, voiding diary parameters, the amount of urine leakage and the quality of life score. RESULTS: The maximum cystometric capacity and the electromyographic activity of pelvic floor muscles increased significantly and the number of voids/day and incontinence episodes/day, and the amount of urine leakage reduced significantly (P < 0.05) in both physiotherapy and combined therapy groups while there was no significant difference in the pharmacotherapy group. After treatment, the number of voids/day increased by 0.3 ± 3.4 in the pharmacotherapy group (P > 0.05) and decreased by 5.1 ± 5.5 and 4.7 ± 5.6 in the physiotherapy and combined therapy groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Statistically significant improvements were observed in all groups according to the number of voids/night and the quality of life scores at the end of the treatment. CONCLUSION: The physiotherapy protocol we introduced in the present study with or without anticholinergic therapy has a substantial positive impact on the treatment of female patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity.

Interferential current versus biofeedback results in urinary stress incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Urinary stress incontinence is a common, disruptive and potentially disabling condition in which the subject complains of involuntary leakage on effort or exertion or on sneezing or coughing. AIM: This study was performed in order to compare the effects of interferential current and biofeedback applications on incontinence severity in patients with urinary stress incontinence. In addition, pelvic muscle strength and quality of life as important parameters in these subjects were investigated. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, controlled study, forty women with moderate intensity of urinary stress incontinence as determined by one-hour pad test were included. Pelvic muscle strength was evaluated by a biofeedback device and quality of life was assessed by a 28-itemed questionnaire. All of the parameters were evaluated before and after the treatments. Twenty cases underwent interferential current therapy, while pelvic floor exercises via biofeedback were applied in the remaining cases. The treatments lasted 15 minutes per session, three times a week for a total of 15 sessions. RESULTS: All of the parameters improved after the treatments in each group (p <0.05) and both treatment modalities seemed to have similar effects on pad test (95% CI: -1.48 - 4.59), pelvic muscle strength (95% CI: -9.29 -1.78) and quality of life (95% CI: -11.91 - 5.31) outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapy modalities used in this trial are applied easily and non invasive. Also, when the finding that no adverse effects were observed during the study period is taken into consideration, it can be concluded that both methods can be used effectively in patients with urinary stress incontinence.