RESUMO
Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) and Tangier disease are genetically and clinically distinct rare inborn errors of metabolism. NPC is caused by defects in either NPC1 or NPC2; whereas Tangier disease is caused by a defect in ABCA1. Tangier disease is currently without therapy, whereas NPC can be treated with miglustat, a small molecule inhibitor of glycosphingolipid biosynthesis that slows the neurological course of the disease. When a Tangier disease patient was misdiagnosed with NPC and treated with miglustat, her symptoms improved. This prompted us to consider whether there is mechanistic convergence between these two apparently unrelated rare inherited metabolic diseases. In this study, we found that when ABCA1 is defective (Tangier disease) there is secondary inhibition of the NPC disease pathway, linking these two diseases at the level of cellular pathophysiology. In addition, this study further supports the hypothesis that miglustat, as well as other substrate reduction therapies, may be potential therapeutic agents for treating Tangier disease as fibroblasts from multiple Tangier patients were corrected by miglustat treatment.
Assuntos
1-Desoxinojirimicina/análogos & derivados , Transportador 1 de Cassete de Ligação de ATP/genética , Doença de Niemann-Pick Tipo C/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Niemann-Pick Tipo C/genética , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Humanos , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intracelular/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteína C1 de Niemann-Pick , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Twenty-five patients with Niemann Pick disease type C (age range: 7 months to 44 years) were enrolled in an Italian independent multicenter trial and treated with miglustat for periods from 48 to 96 months. METHODS: Based on the age at onset of neurological manifestations patients' phenotypes were classified as: adult (n = 6), juvenile (n = 9), late infantile (n = 6), early infantile (n = 2). Two patients had an exclusively visceral phenotype. We clinically evaluated patients' neurological involvement, giving a score of severity ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst) for gait abnormalities, dystonia, dysmetria, dysarthria, and developmental delay/cognitive impairment, and from 0 to 4 for dysphagia. We calculated a mean composite severity score transforming the original scores proportionally to range from 0 to 1 to summarize the clinical picture of patients and monitor their clinical course. RESULTS: We compared the results after 24 months of treatment in 23 patients showing neurological manifestations. Stabilization or improvement of all parameters was observed in the majority of patients. With the exception of developmental delay/cognitive impairment, these results persisted after 48-96 months in 41 - 55% of the patients (dystonia: 55%, dysarthria: 50%, gait abnormalities: 43%, dysmetria: 41%, respectively). After 24 months of therapy the majority of the evaluable patients (n = 20), demonstrated a stabilization or improvement in the ability to swallow four substances of different consistency (water: 65%, purée: 58%, little pasta: 60%, biscuit: 55%). These results persisted after 48-96 months in 40-50% of patients, with the exception of water swallowing. Stabilization or improvement of the composite severity score was detected in the majority (57%) of 7 patients who were treated early (within 3.5 years from onset) and rarely in patients who received treatment later. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that miglustat treatment can improve or stabilize neurological manifestations, at least for a period of time; the severity of clinical conditions at the beginning of treatment can influence the rate of disease progression. This conclusion applies particularly to patients with juvenile or adult onset of the disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2006-005842-35.
Assuntos
1-Desoxinojirimicina/análogos & derivados , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Doença de Niemann-Pick Tipo C/tratamento farmacológico , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/administração & dosagem , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Esquema de Medicação , Inibidores Enzimáticos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Doença de Niemann-Pick Tipo C/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gaucher disease, a rare disorder, is caused by inherited deficiency of the enzyme glucocerebrosidase. It is unique among the ultra-orphan disorders in that four treatments are currently approved by various regulatory authorities for use in routine clinical practice. Hitherto, because of the relatively few people affected worldwide, many of whom started therapy during a prolonged period when there were essentially no alternatives to imiglucerase, these treatments have not been systematically evaluated in studies such as randomized controlled trials now considered necessary to generate the highest level of clinical evidence. OBJECTIVES: To summarize all available randomized controlled study data on the efficacy and safety of enzyme replacement therapies and substrate reduction therapy for treating Gaucher disease. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register. Additional searches were conducted on ClinicalTrials.gov for any ongoing studies with potential interim results, and through PubMed. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews.Date of last search: 07 August 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized and quasi-randomized controlled studies (including open-label studies and cross-over studies) assessing enzyme replacement therapy or substrate reduction therapy, or both, in all types of Gaucher disease were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in the included studies, and extracted relevant data. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 488 studies retrieved by the electronic searches, eight met the inclusion criteria and were analysed (300 participants). Response parameters were restricted to haemoglobin concentration, platelet count, spleen and liver volume and serum biomarkers (chitotriosidase and CCL18). Only one publication reported a 'low risk of bias' score in all parameters assessed, and all studies included were randomized.Four studies reported the responses to enzyme replacement therapy of previously untreated individuals with type 1 Gaucher disease. Two studies investigated maintenance enzyme replacement therapy in people with stable type 1 Gaucher disease previously treated for at least two years. One study compared substrate reduction therapy, enzyme replacement therapy and a combination thereof as maintenance therapy in people with type 1 Gaucher disease previously treated with enzyme replacement therapy. One study examined substrate reduction therapy in people with chronic neuronopathic (type 3) Gaucher disease who continued to receive enzyme replacement therapy.Treatment-naïve participants had similar increases in haemoglobin when comparing those receiving imiglucerase or alglucerase at 60 units/kg, imiglucerase or velaglucerase alfa at 60 U/kg, taliglucerase alfa at 30 units/kg or 60 units/kg, and velaglucerase alfa at 45 units/g or 60 units/kg. For platelet count response in participants with intact spleens, a benefit for imiglucerase over velaglucerase alfa at 60 units/kg was observed, mean difference -79.87 (95% confidence interval -137.57 to -22.17). There were no other significant differences in platelet count response when comparing different doses of velaglucerase alfa and of taliglucerase alfa, and when comparing imiglucerase to alglucerase. Spleen and liver volume reductions were not significantly different in any enzyme replacement therapy product or dose comparison study. Although a dose effect on serum biomarkers was not seen after nine months, a significantly greater reduction with higher dose was reported after 12 months in the velaglucerase study, mean difference 16.70 (95% confidence intervaI 1.51 to 31.89). In the two enzyme replacement therapy maintenance studies comparing infusions every two weeks and every four weeks, there were no significant differences in haemoglobin concentration, platelet count, and spleen and liver volumes over a 6 to 12 month period when participants were treated with the same cumulative dose.A total of 25 serious adverse events were reported, nearly all deemed unrelated to treatment.There are, as yet, no randomized trials of substrate reduction therapy in treatment-naïve patients that can be evaluated. Miglustat monotherapy appeared as effective as continued enzyme replacement therapy for maintenance of hematological, organ and biomarker responses in people with type 1 Gaucher disease previously treated with imiglucerase for at least two years. In those with neuronopathic Gaucher disease, no significant improvements in haemoglobin concentration, platelet count or organ volumes occurred when enzyme replacement therapy was augmented with miglustat.One randomized controlled study assessing substrate reduction therapy was published immediately prior to producing the final version of this review, and this, along with a further ongoing study (expected to be published in the near future), will be assessed for eligibility in a future update of the review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results reflect the limitations of analysing evidence restricted to prospective randomized controlled trials, especially when dealing with chronic rare diseases. This analysis suggests that, during the first year of treatment, different recombinant glucocerebrosidases are bio-similar and non-inferior in safety and efficacy for surrogate biological response parameters. Enzyme replacement therapy given at 30 to 45 units/kg body weight every two to four weeks was generally as effective as the 60 unit/kg dose for the assessed clinical outcomes. The analysis emphasise the need to determine whether it is realistic to carry out multi-decade prospective clinical trials for rare diseases such as type 1 Gaucher disease. With large treatment effects on the classical manifestations of the disorder, therapeutic investigations in Gaucher disease mandate innovative trial designs and methodology to secure decisive data concerning long-term efficacy and safety - with the realization that knowledge about disease-modifying actions that are sustained are of crucial importance to people with this chronic condition.
Assuntos
Terapia de Reposição de Enzimas/métodos , Doença de Gaucher/tratamento farmacológico , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/efeitos adversos , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/análogos & derivados , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Doença de Gaucher/sangue , Glucosilceramidase/uso terapêutico , Hemoglobina A/metabolismo , Hepatomegalia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Contagem de Plaquetas , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Esplenomegalia/tratamento farmacológico , Especificidade por SubstratoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Following approval in the EU in 2002 and the USA in 2003, an Intensive Safety Surveillance Scheme (IS(3) ) was initiated to educate prescribers on the appropriate use of miglustat for the treatment of type I Gaucher disease (GD1), and to actively solicit safety-relevant information. This report summarises data from all patients enrolled in IS(3) between its initiation in 2003 and its closure in October 2012. METHODS: The IS(3) was a prospective observational drug registry with a secure internet-based data capture system. All patients receiving miglustat at participating sites received standard medical care according to routine medical practice. Data on patient and disease characteristics were collected at patient enrolment, subsequent follow-up visits and treatment discontinuation (if applicable). Data were summarised using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: During the 9 years of IS(3) , 407 patients were enrolled at 111 sites across 15 European countries. Approximately half (n = 202) had GD1, and half had other diseases (mainly Niemann-Pick disease type C (NP-C), for which miglustat was approved in Europe in 2009). In total, 368 patients had data from at least one follow-up visit, 192 of whom had GD1. IS(3) provided data from 798 patient-years exposure to miglustat. Safety-relevant data were consistent with earlier published 5-year findings from IS(3) , the safety profile reported for miglustat in GD1 clinical trials and other published information on GD1 manifestations. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results of this long-term safety surveillance programme were in line with the well-known, documented safety profile of miglustat.
Assuntos
1-Desoxinojirimicina/análogos & derivados , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Doença de Gaucher/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Gaucher/epidemiologia , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados/métodos , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/efeitos adversos , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados/tendências , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tangier disease (TD) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder, resulting from mutations in the ATP binding cassette transporter (ABCA1) gene. The deficiency of ABCA1 protein impairs high density lipoprotein (HDL) synthesis and cholesterol esters trafficking. CASE REPORT: A 58 year-old female, presenting with complex clinical signs (splenomegaly, dysarthria, dysphagia, ataxia, tongue enlargement, prurigo nodularis, legs lymphedema, pancytopenia and bone marrow foam cells), was misdiagnosed as Niemann-Pick C (NPC) and treated with miglustat (300 mg/day), normalizing neurological symptoms and improving skin lesions and legs lymphedema. Subsequently filipin-staining and molecular analysis for NPC genes were negative. Lipid profiling showed severe deficiency of HDL, 2 mg/dl (n.v. 45-65) and apoAI, 5.19 mg/dl (n.v. 110-170), suggesting TD as a probable diagnosis. Molecular analysis of ABCA1 gene showed the presence of a novel homozygous deletion (c.4464-486_4698 + 382 Del). Miglustat treatment was then interrupted with worsening of some neurological signs (memory defects, slowing of thought processes) and skin lesions. Treatment was restarted after 7 months with neurological normalization and improvement of skin involvement. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest miglustat as a possible therapeutic approach in this untreatable disease. The mechanisms by which miglustat ameliorates at least some clinical manifestations of TD needs to be further investigated.
Assuntos
1-Desoxinojirimicina/análogos & derivados , Doença de Tangier/diagnóstico , Doença de Tangier/tratamento farmacológico , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/uso terapêutico , Transportador 1 de Cassete de Ligação de ATP/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Tangier/genética , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) is a lysosomal storage disease characterized by progressive neurological degeneration. Miglustat is the first approved specific therapy and its efficacy in stabilizing or slowing disease progression has been demonstrated in previous studies. We evaluated data from 10 NPC patients treated with Miglustat in a single study centre. All disease manifestations were assessed and patients were stratified according to age at onset of neurological symptoms. Neurological data were recorded by using a modified version of the NP-C disability scale; a "composite score" and a "mean annual change" were calculated to evaluate disease progression. We observed a mean annual change of the composite score of 0.04 in our cohort, indicating slower progression of neurological symptoms if compared with the natural history of the disease. The evidence of slower disease evolution in patients treated with Miglustat suits with previous data and here it is also emphasized by the comparison between disease progression in two early-infantile onset patients receiving different Miglustat dosages. Evaluation of the mean annual change for individual subgroups of patients evidenced minor values in juvenile patients, highlighting better response in such class of patients. Among individual neurological parameters, swallowing showed the minor mean annual change (0.02), indicating better response to therapy. We underline the importance of using a standardized disability scale to quantify and compare neurological features and their evolution over time.
Assuntos
1-Desoxinojirimicina/análogos & derivados , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Doença de Niemann-Pick Tipo C/tratamento farmacológico , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/administração & dosagem , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/efeitos adversos , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idade de Início , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Tardio , Pessoas com Deficiência , Inibidores Enzimáticos/administração & dosagem , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Inibidores de Glicosídeo Hidrolases , Humanos , Masculino , Doença de Niemann-Pick Tipo C/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Gaucher disease is the first lysosomal disorder for which clinically effective enzyme replacement therapy has been introduced. Lifelong treatment with imiglucerase, the recombinant glucocerebrosidase manufactured by the Genzyme Corporation (MA, USA), is administered intravenously - usually at biweekly intervals. An acute shortage of imiglucerase (to 20% of prior global supply) has occurred as a result of viral contamination of the production facility; production was halted, and a full supply of imiglucerase is not anticipated until January 2010. An urgent meeting of physicians, researchers, and patients was convened through the agency of the European Working Group for Gaucher Disease; this was instigated by patients internationally represented by the European Gaucher Alliance. Here we present a position statement based on the findings of the group, with key recommendations about identification and monitoring of at-risk patients threatened by the abrupt withdrawal of treatment, the equitable distribution of residual imiglucerase - and access to alternative treatments including those that have completed phase III clinical trials but have not yet been licensed.
Assuntos
Terapia de Reposição de Enzimas , Doença de Gaucher/tratamento farmacológico , Glucosilceramidase/provisão & distribuição , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/análogos & derivados , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/uso terapêutico , África do Norte/epidemiologia , Ensaios de Uso Compassivo , Contaminação de Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Drogas em Investigação/provisão & distribuição , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Reposição de Enzimas/estatística & dados numéricos , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Doença de Gaucher/epidemiologia , Doença de Gaucher/terapia , Glucosilceramidase/uso terapêutico , Guias como Assunto , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Prioridades em Saúde , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Oriente Médio/epidemiologia , Proteínas Recombinantes/provisão & distribuição , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , VesivirusRESUMO
PURPOSE: Miglustat (Zavesca) is an orally-available substrate reduction therapy (SRT) for treatment of mild-to-moderate type 1 Gaucher disease (GD1) in adult patients unsuitable for enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Miglustat has not been evaluated in children with GD1, and is not used during pregnancy and breast-feeding. A non-interventional, prospective, web-based safety surveillance programme was initiated at the time of the European launch of miglustat in 2003, and is ongoing. We report the first 5 years of collected data, focusing on neurological manifestations. METHODS: Data were collected on 122 GD1 patients between March 2003 and April 2008, representing 244 patient-years cumulative miglustat post-authorisation experience. The electronically-captured data collected from participating physicians includes patient demographics, prior and current therapies, baseline disease manifestations and concurrent conditions, disease severity, duration of miglustat exposure, and safety-relevant information. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age at baseline was 46.1 (16.5) years. At baseline, bone disease and neurological manifestations were reported in 55.6 and 28.6% of patients, respectively; the latter included peripheral neuropathy (7.2%) and a wide variety of neurological symptoms and signs. In addition, 23.2% had other health conditions relevant to neurological status. During the reporting period, new neurological manifestations were reported in 23 (18.9%) patients, principally tremor. Thirty-five (28.7%) patients discontinued treatment, predominantly for gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances (11.5%), two-thirds of which occurred during the first 6 months. CONCLUSION: The safety profile of miglustat in GD1 patients included in the safety surveillance programme is overall consistent with that reported in the registration and other clinical trials, and no new safety finding was identified.