Effect of radiochemical modification on biodistribution of scFvD2B antibody fragment recognising prostate specific membrane antigen.

Antibody-based reagents represent a promising strategy as clinical diagnostic tools. Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second-leading cause of death in males in the Western population. There is a presently unmet need for accurate diagnostic tool to localize and define the extent of both primary PCa and occult recurrent disease. One of the most suitable targets for PCa is the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) recognised by the monoclonal antibody D2B that we re-shaped into the single chain Fv (scFv format). Aim of this study was to evaluate in preclinical in vivo models the target specificity of scFvD2B after labelling with different radionuclides. (111)In radiolabelling was performed via the chelator Bz-NOTA, and (131)I radioiodination was performed using iodogen. The potential for molecular imaging and the biological behaviour of the radiolabelled scFvD2B were evaluated in mice bearing two subcutaneous PCa isogenic cell lines that differed only in PSMA expression. Biodistribution studies were performed at 3, 9, 15 and 24h after injection to determine the optimal imaging time point. A significant kidney accumulation, as percentage of injected dose of tissue (%ID/g), was observed for (111)In-scFvD2B at 3h after injection (45%ID/g) and it was maintained up to 24h (26%ID/g). By contrast, kidney accumulation of (131)I-scFvD2B was only marginally (0.3%ID/g at 24h). At the optimal time point defined between 15h and 24h, regardless of the radionuclide used, the scFvD2B was able to localize significantly better in the PSMA expressing tumours compared to the negative control; with (131)I-scFvD2B yielding a significantly better target/background ratio compared to (111)In-scFvD2B. These data suggest that, besides antigen specificity, chemical modification may affect antibody fragment biodistribution.

Naftopidil for the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to systematically review the effects of the adrenoreceptor A1D antagonist naftopidil in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). METHODS: A structured and comprehensive MEDLINE search was conducted for original articles, reviews, and metanalyses assessing the clinical pharmacology as well as the safety of naftopidil in the treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH. English-language publications dating from 1950 to 2013 were considered. RESULTS: In the considered timeframe, 14 randomized clinical trials (RCT) were reported. Overall, the outcome measures assessed in the various reports included in the present review were changes from baseline in: International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) score, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), residual volume (PVR), and adverse effects. Although additional well designed, worldwide, placebo-controlled and randomized studies are necessary to confirm the long-term outcomes of naftopidil pharmacotherapy, current data suggest that naftopidil administration in BPH patients provides comparable improvements in total IPSS, QoL, and urinary symptoms from baseline relative to 0.2 mg/d tamsulosin and 8 mg/d silodosin. However, improvements in Qmax are generally less with naftopidil than with tamsulosin. Reported adverse effects related to naftopidil administration are negligible and usually mild. CONCLUSION: It remains unknown whether the data reported on naftopidil in the Japanese population are applicable in symptomatic BPH patients from western countries given that: (1) no English-language clinical trials have compared naftopidil to placebo in Western countries; (2) all clinical trials available were carried out in Japan; (3) in the comparative studies with tamsulosin, the dose of this drug was lower than the recommended dose in Western countries; (4) no data from long-term clinical trials evaluating drug safety beyond 18 weeks.