Life-Course Brain Health as a Determinant of Late-Life Mental Health: American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry Expert Panel Recommendations.

This position statement of the Expert Panel on Brain Health of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry (AAGP) emphasizes the critical role of life course brain health in shaping mental well-being during the later stages of life. Evidence posits that maintaining optimal brain health earlier in life is crucial for preventing and managing brain aging-related disorders such as dementia/cognitive decline, depression, stroke, and anxiety. We advocate for a holistic approach that integrates medical, psychological, and social frameworks with culturally tailored interventions across the lifespan to promote brain health and overall mental well-being in aging adults across all communities. Furthermore, our statement underscores the significance of prevention, early detection, and intervention in identifying cognitive decline, mood changes, and related mental illness. Action should also be taken to understand and address the needs of communities that traditionally have unequal access to preventive health information and services. By implementing culturally relevant and tailored evidence-based practices and advancing research in geriatric psychiatry, behavioral neurology, and geroscience, we can enhance the quality of life for older adults facing the unique challenges of aging. This position statement emphasizes the intrinsic link between brain health and mental health in aging, urging healthcare professionals, policymakers, and a broader society to prioritize comprehensive strategies that safeguard and promote brain health from birth through later years across all communities. The AAGP Expert Panel has the goal of launching further activities in the coming months and years.

Susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence in adolescence following mindfulness training.

Mindfulness training programmes have shown to encourage prosocial behaviours and reduce antisocial tendencies in adolescents. However, less is known about whether training affects susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. The current study investigated the effect of mindfulness training (compared with an active control) on self-reported prosocial and antisocial tendencies and susceptibility to prosocial and antisocial influence. 465 adolescents aged 11-16 years were randomly allocated to one of two training programmes. Pre- and post-training, participants completed a social influence task. Self-reported likelihood of engaging in prosocial and antisocial behaviours did not change post-training, and regardless of training group, participants showed a higher propensity for prosocial influence than for antisocial influence. Finally, participants were less influenced by antisocial ratings following both training programmes.

The Reality of Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: Who Is Utilizing EAS?

OBJECTIVE: To report the proportion of subjects successfully fit with combined electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) compared with those with preserved hearing (HP) after cochlear implantation (CI). In addition, to 1) report the trends in HP and EAS fit rates over time and 2) identify and characterize those patients who preferred the electric only condition. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Two hundred five postlingually deafened adults with bilateral SNHL and a preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average 80 dB HL or better in the ear to be implanted. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects underwent CI from 2013 to 2018 with routine pre- and postoperative audiometric testing performed at 6- and 12-months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of patients fit with EAS, low-frequency pure-tone average, and threshold shift. RESULTS: Overall, 141 patients (78.6%) had HP at activation and 42.6% were fit with EAS. Rates of EAS fitting improved from 36.4% in 2013 to 69.0% in 2018. 93.5% of patients had hearing preserved in 2018 compared with 57.9% in 2013. Six patients rejected EAS after a trial period either because of discomfort or poor sound quality. Eight patients had EAS removed because of loss of aidable hearing over time (between activation to 12 mo). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high percentages of HP in the literature, EAS may be under-utilized in the adult CI population. Moving toward a universal definition of HP across institutions may better represent the potential for EAS fitting and a clinical measure capable of identifying patients best suited to benefit from EAS.

Stimulation rate reduction and auditory development in poorly performing cochlear implant users with auditory neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) exhibit altered neural synchrony in response to auditory stimuli. It has been hypothesized that a slower rate of electrical stimulation in programming strategies for cochlear implant (CI) users with ANSD may enhance development of neural synchrony and speech perception abilities. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary otologic practice. PATIENTS: Twenty-two patients with ANSD underwent CI. Patients with complete postoperative audiometric data and at least 2 years of follow-up were included in further analysis. INTERVENTION: Thirteen patients patients met inclusion criteria. Five "poorly performing" CI recipients with ANSD who had not developed closed-set speech perception abilities despite at least 2 years of implant use underwent implant programming to lower the neural stimulation rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception abilities over time using parent questionnaire, closed-set testing, and open-set measures. RESULTS: A high incidence of comorbid conditions was present in the poor performers, including cognitive delay (n = 2), motor delay (n = 3), and autism spectrum disorder (n = 1). The median time to rate slowing in 5 poor performers was 29 months after implant activation. Three of 5 patients achieved closed-set speech perception scores higher than 60% after 6 to 16 months of implant use at the slower rates. At last follow-up (median, 42 mo), no poor performer had yet achieved open-set speech perception abilities. Of all CI recipients with ANSD included in analysis, open-set speech perception abilities developed in 46% (6/13). CONCLUSION: In CI recipients with ANSD who demonstrate limited auditory skills development despite prolonged implant use, lowering the stimulation rate may facilitate acquisition of closed-set speech perception abilities. Further efforts on the study of programming parameters in ANSD patients with CIs are necessary to maximize auditory development in this patient population.