Complication rate of intraarterial treatment of severe cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage with nimodipine and percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty: Worth the risk?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Arterial cerebral vasospasm (CVS) is discussed as the main pathomechanism for DCI. Due to positive effects of per os nimodipine, intraarterial nimodipine application is used in patients with DCI. Further, percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) is applied in focal high-grade spasm of intracranial arteries. However, clinical benefits of those techniques are unconfirmed in randomized trials so far, and complications might occur. We analyzed the occurrence of new infarcts in patients with severe CVS treated intra-arterially to assess benefits and risks of those techniques in a large single-center collective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All imaging and clinical data of 88 patients with CVS after SAH and 188 procedures of intraarterial nimodipine infusion and additional PTA in selected cases (18 patients, 20 PTA procedures) treated at our institution were reviewed. In the event of new infarcts after endovascular treatment of CVS, infarct patterns were analyzed to determine the most probable etiology. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of patients developed new cerebral infarction after intraarterial nimodipine and additional PTA in selected cases. Hereunder 47% were caused by persisting CVS. In 6% of patients, 3% of procedures respectively, new infarcts occurred due to complications of the intraarterial treatment including thromboembolism and arterial dissection. Of those, 3% of patients, 2% of procedures respectively, were assigned to thrombembolic complications of digital substraction angiography for intraarterial nimodipine. 17% of all patients treated with PTA (3/18=17%) showed infarction as a complication of PTA (15% of all PTA procedures). In 1% of patients, etiology of new infarction remained unclear. CONCLUSION: Ischemic complications occur in about 6% of patients treated intraarterially for CVS, 3% of procedures respectively. Further, to date a benefit for patients treated with this therapy could not be proven. Therefore, intraarterial treatment of CVS should be performed only in carefully selected cases.

A Network-Wide Stroke Team Program Reduces Time to Treatment for Endovascular Stroke Therapy in a Regional Stroke-Network.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Driven by the positive results of randomized, controlled trials of endovascular stroke therapies (EVT) in stroke patients with large vessel occlusion, different approaches to speed up the workflow for EVT candidates are currently being implemented worldwide. We aimed to assess the effect of a simple stroke network-wide workflow improvement project, primarily focusing on i.v. thrombolysis, on process times for patients undergoing EVT. METHODS: In 2015, we conducted a network-wide, peer-to-peer acute stroke workflow improvement program for i.v. thrombolysis with the main components of implementing a binding team-based algorithm at every stroke unit of the regional network, educating all stroke teams about non-technical skills and providing a stroke-specific simulation training. Before and after the intervention we recorded periprocedural process times, including patients undergoing EVT at the 3 EVT-capable centers (January - June 2015, n = 80 vs. July 2015 - June 2016, n = 184). RESULTS: In this multi-centric evaluation of 268 patients receiving EVT, we observed a relevant shortening of the median time from symptom onset to EVT specifically in patients requiring secondary transfer by almost an hour (300 min, 25-75% interquartile range [IQR] 231-381 min to 254 min, IQR 215.25-341 min; p = 0.117), including a reduction of the median door-to-groin time at the EVT-capable center in this patient group by 15.5 min (59 min, IQR 35-102 min to 43.5 min, IQR 27.75-81.25 min; p = 0.063). In patients directly admitted to an EVT-capable center, the median door-to-groin interval was reduced by 10.5 min (125 min, IQR 83.5-170.5 min to 114.5 min, IQR 66.5-151 min; p = 0.167), but a considerable heterogeneity between the centers was observed (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We show that a simple network-wide workflow improvement program primarily directed at fast i.v. thrombolysis also accelerates process times for EVT candidates and is a promising measure to improve the performance of an entire stroke network.