Knowledge and use of the ICM global standards for midwifery education.

OBJECTIVE: To explore how the International Confederation of Midwives Global Standards for Midwifery Education are currently used and their influence, if any, on the development of education programs globally. Secondarily, to identify current challenges to midwifery education. DESIGN: Cross-sectional exploratory descriptive qualitative study using focus groups and one-on-one interviews to collect data about knowledge of and use of the Education Standards and participants perceived current challenges to midwifery education. Interviews conducted in English, Spanish, and French. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Midwife educators, education directors, or regulators attending one of four national/international conferences or one-on-one interviews in person or via internet. Thematic analysis was employed using the Framework approach for data analysis. FINDINGS: There were 11 focus groups and 19 individual interviews involving 145 midwives from 61 countries. There was a general awareness of the Education Standards amongst the participants although knowledge about the specifics of the document was lacking. The Standards were mainly used as a reference and greater use was made when developing new educational programs. The Standards identified as most difficult to meet included: organization and administration of the program, ensuring that teachers were formally prepared as teachers, meeting targets for teacher to student ratios and that 50% of educational time took place in the clinical setting. Universally endorsed challenges to midwifery education were: 1) inability to accommodate the increase in curricular content without compromising prior content or lengthening programs; 2) insufficient resources including lack of classroom and clinical teachers; 3) medicalization of childbirth and health system changes limiting student exposure to the midwifery care model; 4) role conflict and competition for clinical experience with other health professionals. KEY CONCLUSIONS: The Education Standards need to be more widely disseminated and implemented. Stronger collaborations with clinical settings and government systems are required to solve the current challenges to midwifery education. IMPLICATION OF PRACTICE: Well-educated midwives can provide the majority of maternal and neonatal care, however it will require an investment in strengthening midwifery programs globally for this goal to be achieved.

Contributions and challenges of cross-national comparative research in migration, ethnicity and health: insights from a preliminary study of maternal health in Germany, Canada and the UK.

BACKGROUND: Public health researchers are increasingly encouraged to establish international collaborations and to undertake cross-national comparative studies. To-date relatively few such studies have addressed migration, ethnicity and health, but their number is growing. While it is clear that divergent approaches to such comparative research are emerging, public health researchers have not so far given considered attention to the opportunities and challenges presented by such work. This paper contributes to this debate by drawing on the experience of a recent study focused on maternal health in Canada, Germany and the UK. DISCUSSION: The paper highlights various ways in which cross-national comparative research can potentially enhance the rigour and utility of research into migration, ethnicity and health, including by: forcing researchers to engage in both ideological and methodological critical reflexivity; raising awareness of the socially and historically embedded nature of concepts, methods and generated 'knowledge'; increasing appreciation of the need to situate analyses of health within the wider socio-political setting; helping researchers (and research users) to see familiar issues from new perspectives and find innovative solutions; encouraging researchers to move beyond fixed 'groups' and 'categories' to look at processes of identification, inclusion and exclusion; promoting a multi-level analysis of local, national and global influences on migrant/minority health; and enabling conceptual and methodological development through the exchange of ideas and experience between diverse research teams. At the same time, the paper alerts researchers to potential downsides, including: significant challenges to developing conceptual frameworks that are meaningful across contexts; a tendency to reify concepts and essentialise migrant/minority 'groups' in an effort to harmonize across countries; a danger that analyses are superficial, being restricted to independent country descriptions rather than generating integrated insights; difficulties of balancing the need for meaningful findings at country level and more holistic products; and increased logistical complexity and costs. SUMMARY: In view of these pros and cons, the paper encourages researchers to reflect more on the rationale for, feasibility and likely contribution of proposed cross-national comparative research that engages with migration, ethnicity and health and suggests some principles that could support such reflection.