Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rheumatol Int ; 33(7): 1737-44, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23283539

RESUMO

The aim of this trial is to investigate and compare the effects of phonophoresis (PP) and ultrasound (US) therapy on pain, disability, trunk muscle strength, walking performance, spinal mobility, quality of life (QOL), and depression in the patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). A total of 60 patients with definite CLBP were included in this study. The patients were randomized into three groups. Group 1 (n = 20) was accepted as the control group and was given only exercises. Group 2 (n = 20) received US treatment and exercises. Group 3 (n = 20) received PP and exercises. All of the programs were performed 3 days a week, for 6 weeks. The pain (visual analog scale, VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, ODQ and pain disability index, PDI), walking performance (6 min walking test, 6MWT), depression (Beck Depression Inventory scores, BDI), and QOL (Short Form 36, SF-36) of all participants were evaluated. The trunk muscle strength was measured with a handheld dynamometer. All of the groups showed statistically significant improvements in pain, disability, muscle strength, endurance, 6MWT, mobility, QOL, and depression. The intergroup comparison showed significant differences in VAS pain, 6MWT, and EMS, among three groups. These differences were statistically significant in groups 2 and 3 compared with the group 1. The intergroup comparison showed significant difference in pain, physical function, and energy subgroups of SF-36. The differences were statistically in group 3 compared with group 1 and 2. We observed that US and PP treatments were effective in the treatment of patients with CLBP but PP was not found to be superior over ultrasound therapy.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Capsaicina/administração & dosagem , Dor Crônica/terapia , Terapia por Exercício , Dor Lombar/terapia , Fonoforese , Terapia por Ultrassom , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Terapia Combinada , Avaliação da Deficiência , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Dor Lombar/fisiopatologia , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Força Muscular/efeitos dos fármacos , Medição da Dor , Percepção da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Limiar da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Método Simples-Cego , Coluna Vertebral/efeitos dos fármacos , Coluna Vertebral/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Turquia , Caminhada
2.
Rheumatol Int ; 32(10): 3007-16, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21898066

RESUMO

The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic MD on pain, functional capacity, muscle strength, quality of life, and depression in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). A total of 40 inpatient subjects with definite SIS were included in this study. These patients were sequentially randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 20) received therapeutic MD. Group 2 (n = 20) was served as control group and received sham MD. Superficial heat and exercise program were given to both groups. Both of the programs were performed 5 times weekly for 3 weeks. Patients were assessed before treatment (BT), after treatment (AT), and at a 1-month follow-up (F). Outcome measures included visual analogue scale, goniometry, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire, shoulder isokinetic muscle testing, handgrip strength, Short Form 36, and Beck Depression Index. The patients with SIS in each group had significant improvements in pain, shoulder ROM, disability, shoulder muscles and grip strength, quality of life, and depression AT and F when compared with their initial status (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups according to all the parameters regarding the change scores between AT-BT test and F-BT test (P > 0.05). A 2,450-MHz MD regimen showed no beneficial effects in patients with SIS, so the superficial heat and exercise program, as it is efficient, may be preferable for the treatment of SIS, alone.


Assuntos
Depressão/etiologia , Diatermia/métodos , Micro-Ondas/uso terapêutico , Força Muscular , Qualidade de Vida , Síndrome de Colisão do Ombro/terapia , Articulação do Ombro/fisiopatologia , Dor de Ombro/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Artrometria Articular , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Terapia Combinada , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/psicologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Método Duplo-Cego , Terapia por Exercício , Feminino , Força da Mão , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Síndrome de Colisão do Ombro/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Colisão do Ombro/fisiopatologia , Síndrome de Colisão do Ombro/psicologia , Dor de Ombro/diagnóstico , Dor de Ombro/fisiopatologia , Dor de Ombro/psicologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Turquia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA