Psychosocial Functioning of Parents of Youth Receiving Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Parents of youth with chronic pain report psychosocial difficulties, yet treatment often focuses on improving their child's functioning and pain. This study evaluated changes in parents' social and emotional functioning and explored predictors of change, as they completed a parent-focused intervention while their child was enrolled in an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) program. METHODS: Parents (n = 69) completed questionnaires at baseline and weekly (average duration of 4 weeks) during their child's participation in IIPT. Parents engaged in 3 groups per week providing education, therapeutic art, and psychotherapy (3 hr/week total). RESULTS: At baseline, 38% of parents reported scores in the clinically elevated range for at least 1 psychosocial variable. Linear mixed modeling for the full sample indicated reduced parent anxiety (t = -2.72, p <.01) and depression (t = -3.59, p <.001), but not increased emotional support (t = 1.86, p >. 05) or reduced social isolation (t = -1.20, p >.05). For parents with at least moderately elevated psychosocial concerns, statistically significant improvements were observed for all 4 outcomes (all p's<.01). Psychological flexibility, cognitive reappraisal, and emotional suppression were found to be related to changes in parent outcomes (anxiety, depression, isolation, and support). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the benefit of parent-focused interventions in addition to child-focused interventions. Many parents of youth participating in IIPT had elevated scores for at least 1 psychosocial concern at baseline. Brief, parent-focused intervention including psychoeducation, therapeutic art, and psychotherapy targeting mindfulness, acceptance, and values had a significant impact on these parents, particularly those with greater struggles at baseline.

Understanding downstream service profitability generated by dermatology faculty in an academic medical center: a key driver to promotion of access-to-care.

Hiring new dermatology faculty at academic medical centers (AMCs) can be a difficult process. Academic dermatology departments, however, must have the financial freedom to nimbly respond to the needs of their community. To determine the downstream revenue and profitability produced by dermatology faculty, a retrospective review of charges and expenses downstream of professional services was performed to assess dermatology faculty and nurse practitioners from January 2019 to December 2020 at a single AMC in the southern United States. The downstream revenue per dermatology faculty was calculated using institutional data based on the number of services performed and the exact compensation per service. When this was not possible, the Medicare Allowable Charge was used to estimate the compensation for the service provided. Revenue was included from internal referrals to dermatopathology, Mohs surgery and repairs, chemistry and microbiology labs, radiology, and phototherapy. Profitability was calculated using institutional cost data to estimate the expense of each additional unit of services performed. The most valuable source of downstream income was dermatopathology services, which generated $85,395/provider in 2019 and $102,746/provider in 2020. Mohs surgery was also a significant source of downstream revenue contributing $92,715 in 2019 and $96,599 in 2020. Repairs after Mohs surgery internal referrals generated $30,036 in 2019 and $36,507 in 2020. The total contributions of chemistry and microbiology labs, radiology, and phototherapy were considerable but less impactful overall. The total downstream revenue calculated from these services for 2019 was $228,304/provider and $255,549 in 2020. The total downstream profitability for these services was calculated to be $112,597/provider in 2019 and $92,344/provider in 2020. In conclusion, faculty of academic dermatology departments produces a great deal more revenue and profitability for AMCs than the sum of their professional charges.

The Yin and Yang of linkage disequilibrium: mapping of genes and nucleotides conferring insecticide resistance in insect disease vectors.

Genetic technologies developed in the last 20 years have lead to novel and exciting methods to identify genes and specific nucleotides within genes that control phenotypes in field collected organisms. In this review we define and explain two of these methods: linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping and quantitative trait nucleotide (QTN) mapping. The power to detect valid genotype-phenotype associations with LD or QTN mapping depends critically on the extent to which segregating sites in a genome assort independently. LD mapping depends on markers being in disequilibrium with the genes that condition expression of the phenotype. In contrast, QTN mapping depends critically upon most proximal loci being at equilibrium. We show that both patterns actually exist in the genome of Anapheles gambiae, the most important malaria vector in sub-Saharan Africa while segregating sites appear to be largely in equilibrium throughout the genome of Aedes aegypti, the vector of Dengue and Yellow fever flaviviruses. We discuss additional approaches that will be needed to identify genes and nucleotides that control phenotypes in field collected organisms, focusing specifically on ongoing studies of genes conferring resistance to insecticides.