Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Patient Saf ; 18(1): e108-e114, 2022 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32487880

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Documentation of allergies in a coded, non-free-text format in the electronic health record (EHR) triggers clinical decision support to prevent adverse events. Health system-wide patient safety initiatives to improve EHR allergy documentation by specifically decreasing free-text allergy entries have not been reported. The goal of this initiative was to systematically reduce free-text allergen entries in the EHR allergy module. METHODS: We assessed free-text allergy entries in a commercial EHR used at a multihospital integrated health care system in the greater Boston area. Using both manual and automated methods, a multidisciplinary consensus group prioritized high-risk and frequently used free-text allergens for conversion to coded entries, added new allergen entries, and deleted duplicate allergen entries. Environmental allergies were moved to the patient problem list. RESULTS: We identified 242,330 free-text entries, which included a variety of environmental allergies (42%), food allergies (18%), contrast media allergies (13%), "no known allergy" (12%), drug allergies (2%), and "no contrast allergy" (2%). Most free-text entries were entered by medical assistants in ambulatory settings (34%) and registered nurses in perioperative settings (20%). We remediated a total of 52,206 free-text entries with automated methods and 79,578 free-text entries with manual methods. CONCLUSIONS: Through this multidisciplinary intervention, we identified and remediated 131,784 free-text entries in our EHR to improve clinical decision support and patient safety. Additional strategies are required to completely eliminate free-text allergy entry, and establish systematic, consistent, and safe guidelines for documenting allergies.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Documentação , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(10): 1439-1446, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34726142

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of systemic overlap and typical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms in healthcare personnel (HCP) following COVID-19 vaccination and association of reported symptoms with diagnosis of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the context of public health recommendations regarding work exclusion. DESIGN: This prospective cohort study was conducted between December 16, 2020, and March 14, 2021, with HCP who had received at least 1 dose of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. SETTING: Large healthcare system in New England. INTERVENTIONS: HCP were prompted to complete a symptom survey for 3 days after each vaccination. Reported symptoms generated automated guidance regarding symptom management, SARS-CoV-2 testing requirements, and work restrictions. Overlap symptoms (ie, fever, fatigue, myalgias, arthralgias, or headache) were categorized as either lower or higher severity. Typical COVID-19 symptoms included sore throat, cough, nasal congestion or rhinorrhea, shortness of breath, ageusia and anosmia. RESULTS: Among 64,187 HCP, a postvaccination electronic survey had response rates of 83% after dose 1 and 77% after dose 2. Report of ≥3 lower-severity overlap symptoms, ≥1 higher-severity overlap symptoms, or at least 1 typical COVID-19 symptom after dose 1 was associated with increased likelihood of testing positive. HCP with prior COVID-19 infection were significantly more likely to report severe overlap symptoms after dose 1. CONCLUSIONS: Reported overlap symptoms were common; however, only report of ≥3 low-severity overlap symptoms, at least 1 higher-severity overlap symptom, or any typical COVID-19 symptom were associated with infection. Work-related restrictions for overlap symptoms should be reconsidered.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Teste para COVID-19 , Estudos Prospectivos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , Vacinação
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 7(2): 633-640, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30176295

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare but severe hypersensitivity reaction that remains poorly characterized in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe DRESS syndrome cases in an integrated health care system using electronic health record (EHR) allergy module free-text searches. METHODS: We identified DRESS syndrome cases with rash, absolute eosinophil count of 500/L or more, organ involvement, and a European Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Drugs and Collection of Biological Samples score of 2 or more by reviewing those patients from 1980 to 2016 whose EHR allergic reaction matched DRESS-related key words. Liver injury required alanine aminotransferase level of 100 U/L or more, and renal injury required creatinine increase by 0.5 mg/dL (or 50%) or more. Patient and DRESS characteristics were described, resource use was determined, and cost was estimated. RESULTS: Among 3,162,562 patients with 3,319,387 million allergy entries, 538 reactions matched key words, and 69 were DRESS syndrome cases (prevalence 2.18 per 100,000). Patients with DRESS had liver (42%) or renal (42%) injury; 11 (16%) had both liver and renal injury. Primary drug culprits were antibiotics (74%) (vancomycin [39%], ß-lactams [23%], fluoroquinolones [4%], tetracyclines [4%], and sulfonamides [3%]) and anticonvulsants (20%). Of 65 (94%) hospitalized patients with DRESS, 43 (66%) were hospitalized for DRESS syndrome management with median length of stay of 9 days (interquartile range, 6-17 days) and cost approximately $17,101 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Using free-text search of the EHR allergy module identified a large US DRESS syndrome cohort. DRESS prevalence was 2.18 per 100,000 patients. Both liver and kidney injury were frequent, and vancomycin was the most common drug culprit. DRESS cases were morbid and resource-intensive.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/economia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Prevalência
4.
PLoS One ; 11(7): e0159406, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27438379

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia is a morbid infection with mortality benefit from receipt of parenteral ß-lactam therapy. A substantial portion of MSSA bacteremia patients report penicillin allergy, but infrequently have true allergy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and predictors of optimal and adequate therapy in patients with MSSA bacteremia. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Adult inpatients with MSSA bacteremia, January 2009 through October 2013. MAIN MEASURES: The primary measure was a trial of optimal therapy (OT), defined as ≥3 inpatient days or discharge on any first-line agents (nafcillin, oxacillin, cefazolin, or penicillin G, if susceptible). The secondary measure was completion of adequate therapy (AT), defined as ≥10 inpatient days or discharge on an agent appropriate for MSSA bacteremia. Data were electronically gathered with key variables manually validated through chart review. Log-binomial regression models were used to determine the frequency and predictors of outcomes. KEY RESULTS: Of 456 patients, 346 (76%) received a trial of OT. Patients reporting penicillin allergy (13%) were less likely to receive OT trial than those without penicillin allergy (47% vs. 80%, p <0.001). Adjusting for other factors, penicillin allergy was the largest negative predictor of OT trial (RR 0.64 [0.49, 0.83]). Infectious Disease (ID) consultation was the largest positive predictor of OT trial across all patients (RR 1.34 [1.14, 1.57]). Allergy/Immunology consultation was the single most important predictor of OT trial among patients reporting penicillin allergy (RR 2.33 [1.44, 3.77]). Of 440 patients, 391 (89%) completed AT, with ID consultation the largest positive predictor of the outcome (RR 1.28 [1.15, 1.43]). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 25% of patients with MSSA bacteremia did not receive OT trial and about 10% did not receive AT completion. Reported penicillin allergy reduced, and ID consult increased, the likelihood of OT. Allergy evaluation, coupled with ID consultation, may improve outcomes in MSSA bacteremic patients.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/microbiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Meticilina/efeitos adversos , Meticilina/uso terapêutico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Testes Cutâneos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/patologia , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA