Identification of Commercial Antimalarial Herbal Drugs Using Laser-Induced Autofluorescence Technique and Multivariate Algorithms.

In malaria-prone developing countries the integrity of Anti-Malarial Herbal Drugs (AMHDs) which are easily preferred for treatment can be compromised. Currently, existing techniques for identifying AMHDs are destructive. We report on the use of non-destructive and sensitive technique, Laser-Induced-Autofluorescence (LIAF) in combination with multivariate algorithms for identification of AMHDs. The LIAF spectra were recorded from commercially prepared decoction AMHDs purchased from accredited pharmacy shop in Ghana. Deconvolution of the LIAF spectra revealed secondary metabolites belonging to derivatives of alkaloids and classes of phenolic compounds of the AMHDs. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Hierarchical Clustering Analysis (HCA) were able to discriminate the AMHDs base on their physicochemical properties. Based on two principal components, the PCA- QDA (Quadratic Discriminant Analysis), PCA-LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis), PCA-SVM (Support Vector Machine) and PCA-KNN (K-Nearest Neighbour) models were developed with an accuracy performance of 99.0, 99.7, 100.0, and 100%, respectively, in identifying AMHDs. PCA-SVM and PCA-KNN provided the best classification and stability performance. The LIAF technique in combination with multivariate techniques may offer a non-destructive and viable tool for AMHDs identification.

Automatic Classification of Antimalarial Herbal Drugs Exposed to Ultraviolet Radiation from Unexposed Ones Using Laser-Induced Autofluorescence with Chemometric Techniques.

Exposure of antimalarial herbal drugs (AMHDs) to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) affects the potency and integrity of the AMHDs. Instant classification of the AMHDs exposed to UVR (UVR-AMHDs) from unexposed ones (Non-UVR-AMHDs) would be beneficial for public health safety, especially in warm regions. For the first time, this work combined laser-induced autofluorescence (LIAF) with chemometric techniques to classify UVR-AMHDs from Non-UVR-AMHDs. LIAF spectra data were recorded from 200 ml of each of the UVR-AMHDs and Non-UVR-AMHDs. To extract useful data from the spectra fingerprint, principal components (PCs) analysis was used. The performance of five chemometric algorithms: random forest (RF), neural network (NN), support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and k-nearest neighbour (KNN), were compared after optimization by validation. The chemometric algorithms showed that KNN, SVM, NN, and RF were superior with a classification accuracy of 100% for UVR-AMHDs while LDA had a classification accuracy of 98.8% after standardization of the spectra data and was used as an input variable for the model. Meanwhile, a classification accuracy of 100% was obtained for KNN, LDA, SVM, and NN when the raw spectra data was used as input except for RF for which a classification accuracy of 99.9% was obtained. Classification accuracy above 99.74 ± 0.26% at 3 PCs in both the training and testing sets were obtained from the chemometric models. The results showed that the LIAF, combined with the chemometric techniques, can be used to classify UVR-AMHDs from Non-UVR-AMHDs for consumer confidence in malaria-prone regions. The technique offers a non-destructive, rapid, and viable tool for identifying UVR-AMHDs in resource-poor countries.