Randomized phase II study comparing neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/docetaxel versus docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1 for patients with type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer.

Macroscopic type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer, mostly overlapping with scirrhous or linitis plastica type, exhibit a highly invasive nature and show unfavorable prognosis after curative surgery, even with adjuvant chemotherapy. A randomized phase III trial (JCOG0501) failed to demonstrate a survival advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin for this population. The current authors initiated a randomized phase II study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/docetaxel versus docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1 for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer. 76 patients are planned to be enrolled over two years. The primary end point is the proportion of patients with a pathological response (grade 1b or higher) and secondary end points include overall survival and adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs031230231 (rctportal.niph.go.jp).

Study protocol of a single-arm phase 2 study evaluating the preventive effect of topical hydrocortisone for capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (T-CRACC study).

BACKGROUNDS: Clinical evidence of the preventive effectiveness of medium-class topical corticosteroids for capecitabine-induced hand foot syndrome (HFS) is limited. Although the pathogenesis and mechanism of HFS are unclear, inflammatory reactions are thought to be involved in HFS development. This study aimed to evaluate the preventive effect of medium-class topical corticosteroids (hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% topical therapy) for capecitabine-induced HFS in patients with colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin. METHODS: This is a single-center, single-arm, phase 2 study. Patients with colorectal cancer scheduled to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin are enrolled, and topical hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% is applied prophylactically in addition to standard moisturizing therapy. The primary endpoint is the incidence of grade ≥ 2 HFS within three months. The secondary endpoints are the time to onset of HFS, rates of dose reduction, schedule delay, discontinuation caused by capecitabine-induced HFS, and other adverse events. All adverse events are evaluated by clinical pharmacists and attending physicians. DISCUSSION: This study is expected to contribute to the establishment of new supportive care for preventing HFS, not only for colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, but also for various cancer patients receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) as jRCTs031220002. Registered 5 April 2022, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/search Protocol version V.1.0, 16 February 2022.

Palliation of dysphagia in metastatic oesogastric cancers: An international multidisciplinary position.

Malignant dysphagia is the most common symptom in advanced oesogastric cancers patients. Relief of dysphagia allows quality of life improvement, nutritional replenishment and potentially improves prognosis. Chemotherapy alone is effective and should be prioritised in patients with metastatic disease a good performance status, and its impact on dysphagia should be determined before further interventions are planned. Regarding local treatments, the insertion of a covered self-expandable metallic stent is the most commonly used alternative, as it allows for the rapid relief of severe dysphagia. Although several randomised trials have highlighted the role of oesophageal brachytherapy, this technique is often not easily accessible. Contemporary trials are ongoing to better define the role of external radiation therapy. While awaiting these results, external radiation therapy can be considered as a second-best option for patients with a life-expectancy > 3 months. It is important to offer nutritional support and to integrate quality of life measures in the palliative management of dysphagia. This multidisciplinary international position paper aims to propose a decision-making process and highlight randomised trials for the management of malignant dysphagia in metastatic oesogastric cancer patients.

S-1 and Oxaliplatin Versus Tegafur-uracil and Leucovorin as Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With High-risk Stage III Colon Cancer (ACTS-CC 02): A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase III Superiority Trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer has not been established. This randomized phase III study was designed to verify the superiority of SOX over tegafur-uracil and leucovorin (UFT/LV) in patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer (any T, N2, or positive nodes around the origin of the feeding arteries). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection for pathologically confirmed high-risk stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive either UFT/LV (300 mg/m2 of UFT and 75 mg/day of LV on days 1-28, every 35 days, 5 cycles) or SOX (100 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1 and 80 mg/m2 of S-1 on days 1-14, every 21 days, 8 cycles). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: A total of 478 patients in the UFT/LV group and 477 patients in the SOX group were included in the primary analysis. The 3-year DFS was 60.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.0%-64.9%) in the UFT/LV group and 62.7% (95% CI, 58.1%-66.9%) in the SOX group. The stratified hazard ratio for DFS was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.74-1.09; stratified log-rank test, P = .2780). In the N2b subgroup, the 3-year DFS was 46.0% (95% CI, 37.5%-54.0%) in the UFT/LV group and 54.7% (95% CI, 45.7%-62.7%) in the SOX group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55-1.05). CONCLUSION: As postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, SOX was not superior to UFT/LV in terms of DFS in patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer.

TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (GRAPE trial).

BACKGROUND: In our previous randomised phase 2 study for patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer, S-1 plus leucovorin improved progression-free survival compared with S-1 alone. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted at 58 centres in Japan and Korea. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that progressed during first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or recurred during or after post-operative gemcitabine-based adjuvant treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either S-1 (40-60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or TAS-118 (S-1 40-60 mg plus leucovorin 25 mg, twice daily for 1 week in a 2-week cycle). The primary end-point was OS. RESULTS: A total of 603 patients were randomised, and 300 and 301 patients received TAS-118 and S-1, respectively. There was no difference in OS between groups (median OS for TAS-118 versus S-1, 7.6 months versus 7.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82-1.16]; P = 0.756). Progression-free survival was significantly longer with TAS-118 than S-1 (median, 3.9 months versus 2.8 months; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.95]; P = 0.009). There were interactions between Japan and Korea (P = 0.004) and between unresectable and recurrent disease (P = 0.025) in OS. Incidence, profile and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: TAS-118 did not improve OS in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer compared to S-1. Further studies are needed to find patients who have benefit from adding leucovorin to S-1.

Planned Safety Analysis of the ACTS-CC 02 Trial: A Randomized Phase III Trial of S-1 With Oxaliplatin Versus Tegafur and Uracil With Leucovorin as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Stage III Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This trial was designed to verify the superiority of 6 months of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with SOX (S-1 with oxaliplatin) with UFT (tegafur and uracil) with LV (leucovorin) in terms of disease-free survival in patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer. We report the results of a planned safety analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection for high-risk stage III colon cancer (any T, N2, or positive nodes around the origin of the feeding arteries) were randomly assigned to receive either UFT/LV (300-600 mg/d UFT with 75 mg/d LV on days 1-28, every 35 days, for 5 cycles) or SOX (100 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1 with 80-120 mg/d S-1 on days 1-14, every 21 days, for 8 cycles). Treatment status and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 966 patients were enrolled, and 932 patients were included in safety analyses. The planned 6-month protocol treatment was received by 76.9% of the patients in the UFT/LV group and 65.8% of those in the SOX group. The overall incidence of any Grade adverse events (AEs) were 91.3% in the UFT/LV group and 98.7% in the SOX group, and those of Grade ≥ 3 AEs were 16.1% and 36.1%, respectively. As for Grade ≥ 3 AEs, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and sensory neuropathy were more common in the SOX group. The incidence of Grade ≥ 3 sensory peripheral neuropathy was 4.6% in the SOX group. CONCLUSION: The completion rate of adjuvant SOX and its incidence of AEs were acceptable in patients with colon cancer.

Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines 2010 for antiemesis in oncology: executive summary.

The purpose of this article is to disseminate the standard of antiemetic therapy for Japanese clinical oncologists. On the basis of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument, which reflects evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, a working group of the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) reviewed clinical practice guidelines for antiemesis and performed a systematic review of evidence-based domestic practice guidelines for antiemetic therapy in Japan. In addition, because health-insurance systems in Japan are different from those in other countries, a consensus was reached regarding standard treatments for chemotherapy that induce nausea and vomiting. Current evidence was collected by use of MEDLINE, from materials from meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and from European Society of Medical Oncology/Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer guidelines for antiemesis. Initially, 21 clinical questions (CQ) were selected on the basis of CQs from other guidelines. Patients treated with highly emetic agents should receive a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5HT3) receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist. For patients with moderate emetic risk, 5HT3 receptor antagonists and dexamethasone were recommended, whereas for those receiving chemotherapy with low emetic risk dexamethasone only is recommended. Patients receiving high-emetic-risk radiation therapy should also receive a 5HT3 receptor antagonist. In this paper the 2010 JSCO clinical practice guidelines for antiemesis are presented in English; they reveal high concordance of Japanese medical circumstances with other antiemetic guidelines that are similarly based on evidence.

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study.

PURPOSE: The present phase III study was designed to investigate the noninferiority of S-1 alone and superiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 compared with gemcitabine alone with respect to overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The participants were chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive only gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle), only S-1 (80, 100, or 120 mg/d according to body-surface area on days 1 through 28 of a 42-day cycle), or gemcitabine plus S-1 (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus S-1 60, 80, or 100 mg/d according to body-surface area on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle). RESULTS: In the total of 834 enrolled patients, median overall survival was 8.8 months in the gemcitabine group, 9.7 months in the S-1 group, and 10.1 months in the gemcitabine plus S-1 group. The noninferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine was demonstrated (hazard ratio, 0.96; 97.5% CI, 0.78 to 1.18; P < .001 for noninferiority), whereas the superiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 was not (hazard ratio, 0.88; 97.5% CI, 0.71 to 1.08; P = .15). All treatments were generally well tolerated, although hematologic and GI toxicities were more severe in the gemcitabine plus S-1 group than in the gemcitabine group. CONCLUSION: Monotherapy with S-1 demonstrated noninferiority to gemcitabine in overall survival with good tolerability and presents a convenient oral alternative for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Feasibility of mFOLFOX6 as the adjuvant treatment after curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer in Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: An oxaliplatin-based regimen as the adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer demonstrated a survival advantage over fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) in the MOSAIC and NSABP C-07 trials. For adjuvant treatment after the resection of metastases from colorectal cancer), active chemotherapy regimens such as FOLFOX are recommended. However, the safety data of FOLFOX are insufficient for its use after metastasectomy of colorectal cancer in Japanese patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of mFOLFOX6 for adjuvant treatment after the resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: Among 67 consecutive patients who received mFOLFOX6 as the adjuvant treatment after resection of metastases from colorectal cancer between September 2002 and March 2009 in our institution, 51 patients who had not received preoperative chemotherapy were reviewed. The mFOLFOX6 treatment comprised oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and l-leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) given intravenously over a 2-h period on day 1, followed by a 5-FU bolus of 400 mg/m(2) and a 46-h infusion of 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2), every 2 weeks for up to 12 cycles. RESULTS: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (NCI-CTC) grade 3-4 toxicities per patient were: peripheral neuropathy 8%, allergic reaction 4%, aspartate transaminase (AST) 4%, febrile neutropenia 4%, nausea 2%, anorexia 2%, fatigue 2%, alanine transaminase (ALT) 2%, bilirubin 2%, neutrophils 49%, leukocytes 6%, and hemoglobin 2%; 71% of the patients completed the scheduled 12 cycles. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant therapy with mFOLFOX6 after resection of metastases from colorectal cancer is feasible for Japanese patients.

A phase II study of biweekly mitomycin C and irinotecan combination therapy in patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced gastric cancer: a report from the Gastrointestinal Oncology Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG0109-DI Trial).

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have shown that mitomycin C (MMC) acts synergistically with irinotecan (CPT-11). In this phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of MMC/CPT-11 therapy as second-line chemotherapy for patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients had evidence of tumor progression despite prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-based regimens or had relapsed within 6 months after completion of therapy with adjuvant fluoropyrimidines. Treatment consisted of MMC (5 mg/m(2)) and CPT-11 (150 mg/m(2)) administered i.v. every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR). Our hypothesis was that this combination therapy was efficacious when the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the RR exceeded 20% of the threshold RR. RESULTS: Between April 2002 and July 2003, 45 eligible patients were registered and analyzed. Among the 45 patients, 40 (89%) had previously received chemotherapy for metastasis and 24 (53%) had a performance status (PS) of 0. Thirteen partial responses were obtained among the 45 patients, resulting in an overall RR of 29% (95% CI, 16-42%). The median time to progression was 4.1 months, and the median survival time was 10 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 36%. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 29% of the patients, whereas febrile neutropenia occurred in 9%. The incidence rates of grade 3 nausea and diarrhea were 13 and 2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study did not achieve the per-protocol definition of activity, the progression-free survival and overall survival appeared to be promising, with acceptable tolerability. Thus, MMC/CPT-11 therapy as second-line chemotherapy for fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced gastric cancer presents a potential treatment option in patients with a good PS.

[Bevacizumab (Avastin)].

Angiogenesis is one of the hallmarks of cancer. Among the identified angiogenic factors, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a crucial regulator of angiogenesis in normal and malignant tissue. Increased expression of VEGF has been detected in most tumors of humans, and it is associated with increased risks of recurrence, metastasis, and death. Bevacizumab (Avastin), a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF, has been evaluated in various solid tumors. Some pivotal phase III trials demonstrated that the addition of bevacizumab to conventional chemotherapy showed a survival benefit with acceptable toxicity. The United States Food and Drug Administration approved the use of bevacizumab for patients with unresectable colorectal cancer and unresectable non-squamous, non small cell lung cancer. In April 2007, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare approved bevacizumab for patients with unresectable colorectal cancer. The usage of bevacizumab will be stipulated in combination with 5-fluorouracil containing chemotherapy at a dose of 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg given every 14 days. To know its efficacy and safety of bevacizumab is necessary for Japanese patients in the clinical practice.

Phase I/II study of oxaliplatin with weekly bolus fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin (ROX) as first-line therapy for patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) with oxaliplatin is one of the current standard regimens for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Weekly bolus 5-FU with high-dose LV (Roswell Park Memorial Institute Regimen: RPMI) is the most commonly used regimen in Japan. The objectives of this study were to determine the recommended dose (RD) of RPMI combined with oxaliplatin and to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy at the RD. METHODS: The subjects were 18 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) was given intravenously over 2 h on days 1 and 15 with l-LV (250 mg/m2) given intravenously over 2 h and 5-FU as an intravenous bolus on days 1, 8, and 15. This treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. The dose of 5-FU was escalated from 400 mg/m2 (level 1) to 500 mg/m2 (level 2). RESULTS: A total of 14 patients received level 1, and 4 received level 2. Three of the patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in cycle 1 of level 2 (grade 3 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 neutropenia and grade 2 neutropenia in one patient each), requiring that treatment was delayed for longer than 7 days. None of the 14 patients given level 1 had DLT or grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity. Sensory neuropathy occurred in all patients. Objective response rates were 61% in the 18 patients studied and 64% at level 1. The median time to progression was 171 days, and the median overall survival time was 603 days in the 18 patients studied. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) with weekly bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m2) and high-dose l-LV (250 mg/m2) is recommended for further phase III studies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Five-year survivor with liver metastasis from gastric cancer successfully treated with systemic chemotherapy.

We report a patient with liver metastasis from gastric cancer who has achieved a 5-year survival after systemic chemotherapy. The patient was diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer and received a total gastrectomy in August 1991, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Liver and lymph node metastases were detected in April 1994, and systemic chemotherapy with a combination of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was initiated. Although the liver metastasis completely disappeared, lymph node metastasis at the falciform ligament of the liver and around the portal fissure remained after six courses of this therapy. A second type of chemotherapy, a combination of 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate, was then administered, 12 times, from December 1994 to May 1995, during which time no disease progression was observed. After surgery for the metastatic lymph nodes in August 1995, no progression was observed until December 1998, when a tumor thrombus was detected in the portal vein. Combination chemotherapy of irinotecan and cisplatin was initiated in January 1999. Although tumor regression was achieved after two courses of this, the disease continued to progress after five courses. In July 1999, a fourth type of chemotherapy, using 1 M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1 M otastat potassium (S-1), was initiated, and size reduction of the tumor thrombus was achieved; this therapy has continued to the time of submission of this report.