Oral capecitabine as an alternative to i.v. 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: safety results of a randomized, phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Oral capecitabine achieves a superior response rate with an improved safety profile compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We report here the results of a large phase III trial investigating adjuvant oral capecitabine compared with 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic regimen) in Dukes' C colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18-75 years with resected Dukes' C colon carcinoma were randomized to receive 24 weeks of treatment with either oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days (n = 993), or i.v. bolus 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) with i.v. leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, repeated every 28 days (n = 974). RESULTS: Patients receiving capecitabine experienced significantly (P <0.001) less diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea/vomiting, alopecia and neutropenia, but more hand-foot syndrome than those receiving 5-FU/LV. Fewer patients receiving capecitabine experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia/sepsis and stomatitis (P <0.001), although more experienced grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than those treated with 5-FU/LV (P <0.001). Capecitabine demonstrates a similar, favorable safety profile in patients aged <65 years or > or = 65 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Based on its improved safety profile, capecitabine has the potential to replace 5-FU/LV as standard adjuvant treatment for patients with colon cancer. Efficacy results are expected to be available in Keywords: Adjuvant treatment, capecitabine, chemotherapy, colorectal cancer

Answering patients' needs: oral alternatives to intravenous therapy.

Metastatic colorectal cancer has traditionally been treated with i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), with or without leucovorin (LV). 5-FU is administered as either an i.v. bolus or a protracted infusion. Although schedules using the latter method offer efficacy benefits (objective response rate, time to disease progression), protracted infusion schedules are often associated with medical complications, inconvenience, high costs, and poor quality of life. Issues such as quality of life and convenience have influenced treatment decisions, but the availability of oral fluoropyrimidines represents a new development in this domain. Studies have confirmed that the majority of patients prefer oral to i.v. chemotherapy. Questionnaire-based studies have also demonstrated a preference for home-based rather than hospital-/clinic-based therapy. This preference was one of the driving forces behind the development of the oral fluoropyrimidines capecitabine (Xeloda) and uracil plus tegafur (UFT). Oral agents offer patients a more convenient treatment option that can be administered at home, providing patients with a greater sense of control over their therapy, while avoiding the medical complications and psychological distress associated with venous access. This article highlights some of the problems associated with i.v. therapy and reviews the available data on patient preference, including results of a recent, randomized, phase II study. It also provides a critical evaluation of the efficacy and safety profiles of the only two oral fluoropyrimidines approved for prescription, capecitabine and UFT/LV (UFT/LV not available in Germany and the U.S.), compared with those of two infused, 5-FU-based regimens. Finally, the results of an interactive debate exploring the opinions of approximately 400 oncologists on the issues of oral versus i.v. therapy are presented.

[Adjuvant therapy of colorectal carcinoma--1998 status]. / Die adjuvante Therapie des kolorektalen Karzinoms--Stand 1998.

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in western countries. The prognosis is strongly correlated to the TNM-staging system and patients with stage T3-4 and/or node positive disease are at high risk for locoregional or distant relapse. It is now widely accepted that patients with node positive colon cancer should be offered postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Evidence is accumulating that six months' adjuvant fluorouracil plus leucovorin is equivalent to twelve months' fluorouracil and levamisole, which reduces cancer related deaths by more than 30%. Other adjuvant treatment approaches are perioperative regional chemotherapy or monoclonal antibody treatment, and the results of trials comparing these different treatment options alone or in combination are eagerly awaited. In rectal cancer, the risk of locoregional recurrence can be more than 50% and this event is associated with a deterimental effect on quality of life. The technique of mesorectal excision and the use of radiotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have evolved as the most important measures for prevention of locoregional recurrence. In addition, chemotherapy has proven to be effective in reducing metastatic relapse and prolonging survival. The timing of radiotherapy (pre- versus postoperative) and the optimal combination of chemotherapy with radiation are presently important research issues in resected rectal cancer. In both colon and rectal cancer, a common theme emerging from the experience of the last few decades is that administration of dose-intensive fluorouracil is key for the success of adjuvant treatment.