Aromatized Estrogens Amplify Nocturnal Growth Hormone Secretion in Testosterone-Replaced Older Hypogonadal Men.

Context: Testosterone (T) increases GH secretion in older men with a relative lack of T, in hypogonadal men of all ages, and in patients undergoing sex reassignment. The role of estradiol (E2) in men is less well defined. Objective: To assess the contribution of aromatization of T to spontaneous nocturnal and stimulated GH secretion. Participants: Four groups of healthy older men (N = 74, age range 57 to 77 years) were studied. The gonadotropic axis was clamped with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist degarelix. Three groups received T and one group placebo addback. Two T-replaced groups were treated with anastrozole (an aromatase inhibitor) and either placebo or E2 addback. Main Outcome Measures: Ten-minute GH concentration profiles were quantified by deconvolution analysis, after overnight (2200 to 0800 hours) sampling, and after combined IV injection of GHRH (0.3 µg/kg) and GHRH-2 (0.3 µg/kg) and withdrawal of a 2-hour somatostatin infusion (1 µg/kg/h). Results: E2 addback during aromatase inhibition increased basal (P = 0.046), pulsatile (P = 0.020), and total (P = 0.018) GH secretion by 60% to 70%. E2 did not potentiate GH secretory stimuli. Logarithmically transformed pulsatile GH secretion correlated strongly and positively with concurrent E2 concentrations overall (P = 0.028) and under anastrozole treatment (P = 0.005). Conclusion: E2 administration in older men transdermally stimulates overnight pulsatile GH secretion. The exact site of E2 action cannot be ascertained from these experiments but may include hypothalamic loci involved in GH regulation, especially because GH secretagogue effects on somatotrope pituitary cells were not affected.

Estradiol regulates GH-releasing peptide's interactions with GH-releasing hormone and somatostatin in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: Estrogen stimulates pulsatile secretion of GH, via mechanisms that are largely unknown. An untested hypothesis is that estradiol (E2) drives GH secretion by amplifying interactions among GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin (SS), and GH-releasing peptide (GHRP). DESIGN: The design comprised double-blind randomized prospective administration of transdermal E2 vs placebo to healthy postmenopausal women (n=24) followed by pulsatile GHRH or SS infusions for 13 h overnight with or without continuous GHRP2 stimulation. METHODS: End points were mean concentrations, deconvolved secretion, and approximate entropy (ApEn; a regularity measure) of GH. RESULTS: By generalized ANOVA models, it was observed that E2 vs placebo supplementation: i) augmented mean (13-h) GH concentrations (P=0.023), GHRH-induced pulsatile GH secretion over the first 3 h (P=0.0085) and pulsatile GH secretion over the next 10 h (P=0.054); ii) increased GHRP-modulated (P=0.022) and SS-modulated (P<0.001) GH ApEn; and iii) did not amplify GHRH/GHRP synergy during pulsatile GH secretion. By linear regression, E2 concentrations were found to be positively correlated with GH secretion during GHRP2 infusion (P=0.022), whereas BMI was found to be negatively correlated with GH secretion during GHRH (P=0.006) and combined GHRH/GHRP (P=0.015) stimulation. E2 and BMI jointly determined triple (combined l-arginine, GHRH, and GHRP2) stimulation of GH secretion after saline (R²=0.44 and P=0.003) and pulsatile GHRH (R²=0.39 and P=0.013) infusions. CONCLUSION: In summary, in postmenopausal women, E2 supplementation augments the amount (mass) and alters the pattern (regularity) of GH secretion via interactions among GHRH, SS, GHRP, and BMI. These outcomes introduce a more complex model of E2 supplementation in coordinating GH secretion in aging women.

Differential pulsatile secretagogue control of GH secretion in healthy men.

Pulsatile growth hormone (GH) secretion putatively reflects integrated regulation by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin (SST), and GH-releasing peptide (GHRP). GHRH and SST secretion is itself pulsatile. However, how GHRH and SST pulses act along with GHRP to jointly determine pulsatile GH secretion is unclear. Moreover, how testosterone (T) modulates such interactions is unknown. These queries were assessed in a prospectively randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind cohort comprising 26 healthy older men randomized to testosterone (T) vs. placebo supplementation. Pulses of GHRH, SST, or saline were infused intravenously at 90-min intervals for 13 h, along with either continuous saline or ghrelin analog (GHRP-2). The train of pulses was followed by a triple stimulus (combined l-arginine, GHRH, and GHRP-2) to estimate near-maximal GH secretion over a final 3 h. Testosterone vs. placebo supplementation doubled pulsatile GH secretion during GHRH pulses combined with continuous saline (GHRH/saline) (P < 0.01). Pulsatile GH secretion correlated positively with T concentrations (270-1,170 ng/dl) in the 26 men during saline pulses/saline (P = 0.015, R(2) = 0.24), GHRH pulses/saline (P = 0.020, R(2) = 0.22), and combined GHRH pulses/GHRP-2 (P = 0.016, R(2) = 0.25) infusions. Basal nonpulsatile GH secretion correlated with T during saline pulses/GHRP-2 drive (P = 0.020, R(2) = 0.16). By regression analysis, pulsatile GH secretion varied negatively with body mass index (BMI) during saline/GHRP-2 infusion (P = 0.001, R(2) = 0.36), as well as after the triple stimulus preceded by GHRH/GHRP-2 (P = 0.013, R(2) = 0.23). Mean (10-h) GH concentrations under GHRP-2 were predicted jointly by estradiol (positively) and BMI (negatively) (P < 0.001, R(2) = 0.520). These data indicate that estradiol, T, and BMI control pulsatile secretagogue-specific GH-regulatory mechanisms in older men.

History to the discovery of ghrelin.

The most important initial historical time points in the development of the enlarging ghrelin system were 1973, 1976, 1982, 1984, 1990, 1996, 1998, and 1999. At these respective times, the following occurred sequentially: isolation of somatostatin, discovery of unnatural growth-hormone-releasing peptides (GHRPs), isolation of growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), hypothesis of a new natural GHRP different from GHRH, GHRP+GHRH synergism in humans, discovery of the growth hormone secretagogue GHS/GHRP receptor, cloning of the receptor, and finally, isolation and identification of the new natural endogenous GHRP ghrelin. To understand the pharmacology and probably also the physiological regulation of growth hormone (GH) secretion, an important finding was that GHRP increased pulsatile GH secretion in children as well as normal younger and older men and women. This requires endogenous GHRH secretion, even though GHRP alone substantially releases GH from the pituitary in vitro without the addition of GHRH. Unnatural GHRP gave rise to natural GHRP ghrelin because of many talented researchers worldwide. GHRP was first envisioned to be an analog of GHRH but, from comparison of the activity of GHRH and GHRPs between 1982 and1984, it was hypothesized to reflect the activity of a new hormone regulator of GH secretion yet to be isolated and identified. Intravenous bolus GHRP releases more GH than GHRH in humans, but the reverse occurs in vitro. GHRPs are pleiotropic peptides with major effects on GH, nutrition, and metabolism, especially as an additional hormone in combination with GHRH as a new regulator of pulsatile GH secretion. The first indication of pleiotropism was an increase of food intake by GHRP. A major reason for the prolonged initial interest in the GHRPs has been its similar, yet different and complementary, action with GHRH on GH regulation and secretion. Particularly noteworthy is the variable chemistry of the GHRPs. They consist of three major chemical classes, including peptides, partial peptides, and nonpeptides, and all probably act via the same receptor and cellular mechanisms. Generally, most GHRPs have been active by all routes of administration, intravenously (iv), subcutaneously (sc), orally, intranasally, and intracerebroventricularly (icv), which supports their possible broad future clinical utility. From evolutionary studies starting with the zebrafish, the natural receptor and hormone have been present for hundreds of years, underscoring the fundamental evolutionary and functional importance of the ghrelin system. GHRPs were well established to act directly on both the hypothalamus and pituitary several years before the GHS receptor assay (Howard et al., 1996; Smith et al., 1996; Van der Ploeg et al., 1998). Finally, the ghrelin chemical isolation and identification was accomplished surprisingly from the stomach, which is the major site but not the only site, for example, the hypothalamus (Bowers, 2005; Kojima et al., 1999; Sato et al., 2005). Ghrelin was isolated and identified by Kojima and Kangawa et al. in 1999. A primary action of GHRPs continues to concern GH secretion and regulation, but increasingly this has included direct and indirect effects on nutrition and metabolism as well as a variety of other actions which may be pharmacological and/or physiological. Possible continuing and expanding roles of this new hormonal receptor include the central nervous system as well as the cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal, pancreatic, immunological, and anti-inflammatory systems. Our basic and clinical studies have mainly involved effects on GH regulation and secretion and this relationship to metabolism. So far in our studies, the actions of GHRPs and ghrelin on GH secretion and regulation in rats and probably in humans have generally been the same. A current objective is the incorporation of ghrelin into the diffuse endocrine hormonal system especially via GH.

Obese subjects respond to the stimulatory effect of the ghrelin agonist growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 on food intake.

OBJECTIVE: The administration of the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2, like ghrelin, increases food intake (FI) in lean healthy men. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this effect occurs in obese subjects and whether it is dose-dependent. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Nineteen subjects (10 lean and nine obese), all healthy and weight stable, received a double-blind randomized subcutaneous infusion of GHRP-2 at high dose (HD; 1 mug/kg per hour), low dose (0.1 microg/kg per hour), or placebo for 270 minutes over three study visits. Blood for hormone assays was collected through an intravenous forearm catheter. Hunger and fullness were rated on visual analog scales before and after a fixed breakfast (320 kcal at 120 minutes) and a buffet lunch at 240 minutes. Before lunch, subjects received taped instructions to eat as much as they wanted. RESULTS: GHRP-2 infusion significantly increased ad libitum FI in a dose-dependent manner by 10.2 +/- 3.9% at low dose (p = 0.011) and by 33.5 +/- 5.8% at HD (p = 0.000) compared with placebo. Obesity status did not influence the effect of GHRP-2 on FI. All subjects had greater ratings of appetite before but similar levels of fullness after the meal with the HD GHRP-2. Serum GH levels increased dose dependently in all subjects. DISCUSSION: The dual stimulatory effect of GHRP-2 on FI and human GH is dose dependent. Obese individuals retain their ability to respond to GHRP-2 both in terms of FI and human GH.

Somatotropic and gonadotropic axes linkages in infancy, childhood, and the puberty-adult transition.

Integrative neuroendocrine control of the gonadotropic and somatotropic axes in childhood, puberty, and young adulthood proceeds via multiple convergent and divergent pathways in the human and experimental animal. Emerging ensemble concepts are required to embody independent, parallel, and interacting mechanisms that subserve physiological adaptations and pathological disruption of reproduction and growth. Significant advances in systems biology will be needed to address these challenges.

Testosterone supplementation in healthy older men drives GH and IGF-I secretion without potentiating peptidyl secretagogue efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: Testosterone supplementation increases GH and IGF-I concentrations in healthy older men via unknown mechanisms. We examine the hypotheses that (i) testosterone amplifies stimulation of GH secretion by GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2 or GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) infused with l-arginine to limit somatostatin outflow (i.e. upregulates each agonistic pathway), (ii) testosterone augments the effect of both peptidyl secretagogues infused together (i.e. reduces opposition by hypothalamic somatostatin) and (iii) abdominal visceral fat (AVF) mass is a negative determinant of specific secretagogue-stimulated GH secretion. DESIGN: Randomized double-blind crossover design of placebo versus testosterone administration in healthy older men. METHODS: Deconvolution analysis was used to estimate basal GH secretion and the mass (integral) and waveform (time-shape) of GH secretory bursts. RESULTS: Statistical contrasts revealed that administration of testosterone compared with placebo in seven men aged 60-77 years increased fasting concentrations of GH (P < 0.01) and IGF-I (P = 0.003), and basal (P < 0.005) and pulsatile (P < 0.01) GH secretion. Testosterone did not alter the absolute value or rank order of secretagogue efficacy: l-arginine/GHRP-2 (23-fold effect over saline) = GHRH/GHRP-2 (20-fold) > l-arginine/GHRH (7.5-fold). Waveform reconstruction indicated that each stimulus pair accelerated initial GH secretion within a burst (P < 0.01). Regression analysis disclosed a significant inverse association between GH secretory-burst mass and computer tomography-estimated AVF following stimulation with l-arginine/GHRH after testosterone supplementation (R(2) = 0.54, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Supraphysiological testosterone concentrations augment GH and IGF-I production in the elderly male without altering maximal somatotrope responses to single and combined GHRH and GHRP-2 drive, thus predicting multifactorial mechanisms of testosterone upregulation.

Complementary secretagogue pairs unmask prominent gender-related contrasts in mechanisms of growth hormone pulse renewal in young adults.

The present study examines the thesis that pulsatile GH secretion is controlled simultaneously by three principal signals; viz., GHRH, GH-releasing peptide (GHRP, ghrelin), and somatostatin (SS). According to this ensemble notion, no single regulatory peptide acts alone or can be interpreted in isolation. Therefore, to investigate gender-specific control of pulsatile GH secretion, we designed dual-effector stimulation paradigms in eight young men and six women as follows: 1) L-arginine/GHRH (to clamp low SS and high GHRH input); 2) L-arginine/GHRP-2 (to clamp low SS and high GHRP drive); 3) GHRH/GHRP-2 (to clamp high GHRH and high GHRP feedforward); vs. 4) saline (unclamped). Statistical comparisons revealed that: 1) fasting pulsatile GH secretion was 7.6-fold higher in women than men (P < 0.001); 2) L-arginine/GHRH and L-arginine/GHRP-2 evoked, respectively, 4.6- and 2.2-fold greater burst-like GH release in women than men (P < 0.001 and P = 0.015); and 3) GHRH/GHRP-2 elicited comparable GH secretion by gender. In the combined cohorts, estradiol concentrations positively predicted responses to L-arginine/GHRP-2 (r2= 0.49, P = 0.005), whereas testosterone negatively predicted those to L-arginine/GHRH (r2= 0.56, P = 0.002). Based upon a simplified biomathematical model of three-peptide control, the current outcomes suggest that women maintain greater GHRH potency, GHRP efficacy, and opposing SS outflow than men. This inference upholds recent clinical precedence and yields valid predictions of sex differences in self-renewable GH pulsatility.

Ghrelin, appetite, and gastric motility: the emerging role of the stomach as an endocrine organ.

Recent progress in the field of energy homeostasis was triggered by the discovery of adipocyte hormone leptin and revealed a complex regulatory neuroendocrine network. A late addition is the novel stomach hormone ghrelin, which is an endogenous agonist at the growth hormone secretagogne receptor and is the motilin-related family of regulatory peptides. In addition to its ability to stimulate GH secretion and gastric motility, ghrelin stimulates appetite and induces a positive energy balance leading to body weight gain. Leptin and ghrelin are complementary, yet antagonistic, signals reflecting acute and chronic changes in energy balance, the effects of which are mediated by hypothalamic neuropeptides such as neuropeptide Y and agouti-related peptide. Endocrine and vagal afferent pathways are involved in these actions of ghrelin and leptin. Ghrelin is a novel neuroendocrine signal possessing a wide spectrum of biological activities that illustrates the importance of the stomach in providing input into the brain. Defective ghrelin signaling from the stomach could contribute to abnormalities in energy balance, growth, and associated gastrointestinal and neuroendocrine functions.

Estradiol supplementation in postmenopausal women doubles rebound-like release of growth hormone (GH) triggered by sequential infusion and withdrawal of somatostatin: evidence that estrogen facilitates endogenous GH-releasing hormone drive.

We postulated that short-term estradiol replacement in postmenopausal women may act, in part, by facilitating endogenous GHRH release or action. A prediction of this hypothesis is that estradiol repletion should enhance postsomatostatin rebound GH secretion, which appears to be driven by hypothalamic outflow of GHRH. To this end, we administered placebo and estradiol to eight healthy estrogen-withdrawn postmenopausal volunteers in a prospectively randomized, patient-blinded, within-subject crossover design for a total of 36 d. Rebound release of GH was assessed between d 7 and 36 of intervention on separate randomly ordered mornings after continuous iv infusion of saline or somatostatin (9 micro g/kg.h for 3 h). Secretion was quantitated by frequent (10-min) blood sampling for 7 h, GH chemiluminescence assay, and deconvolution analysis. Compared with placebo, estradiol replacement: 1) stimulated spontaneous pulsatile GH secretion by 3.5-fold (95% confidence interval, 2.1- to 5.6-fold) (P < 0.001); and 2) amplified the mass of GH secreted in response to abrupt somatostatin withdrawal by 2.1-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.3- to 3.4-fold) (P = 0.003). Estrogenic augmentation of rebound-like GH secretion was specific, because the pharmacological effects of exogenous GHRH (1 micro g/kg) and GH-releasing peptide-2 (1 micro g/kg, a synthetic ghrelin analog) were not affected. In summary, short-term supplementation with estradiol in postmenopausal individuals doubles the mass of rebound-like GH secretion induced by abrupt somatostatin withdrawal without modifying stimulation by a pharmacological dose of GHRH or GH-releasing peptide-2. Accordingly, we hypothesize that estradiol stimulates pulsatile GH secretion, at least in part, by enhancing the release and/or action of hypothalamic GHRH.

Estradiol supplementation enhances submaximal feed-forward drive of growth hormone (GH) secretion by recombinant human GH-releasing hormone-1,44-amide in a putatively somatostatin-withdrawn milieu.

To test the clinical hypothesis that an estrogen-enriched milieu enhances GHRH action, we administered placebo (Pl) and estradiol-17 beta (E(2)) orally for 23 d to six postmenopausal women in a prospectively randomized, double-masked, within-subject crossover design with 6 wk intervening. The GHRH stimulation protocol entailed consecutive i.v. infusion of L-arginine and a single i.v. pulse of saline or one of five randomly ordered doses of recombinant human GHRH-1,44-amide (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 microg/kg) in a total of 12 separate morning, fasting sessions. GH secretion was monitored by sampling blood every 10 min for 6 h; chemiluminescence assay of GH concentrations; deconvolution analysis of stimulated GH release; and nonlinear dose-response reconstruction. Supplementation with E(2), compared with Pl: 1) increased (mean +/- SEM) E(2) concentrations from 18 +/- 3 (Pl) to 164 +/- 12 pg/ml (to convert to picomoles per liter, multiply by 3.57) (P < 0.001); 2) decreased IGF-I concentrations from 181 +/- 14 to 120 +/- 11 microg/liter (P < 0.01); 3) elevated mean GH concentrations from 0.27 +/- 0.06 to 0.59 +/- 0.08 microg/liter (P = 0.014); 4) potentiated GH secretion stimulated by L-arginine alone by 1.43-fold (P = 0.012); 5) reduced the ED(50) of GHRH from 0.27 +/- 0.02 to 0.13 +/- 0.01 microg/kg (P < 0.01), denoting enhanced GHRH potency; and 6) heightened the maximal slope of the dose-response function from 1.1 +/- 0.1 to 1.4 +/- 0.05 [( microg/liter) ( microg/kg)(-1)] (P < 0.05), signifying augmented pituitary sensitivity. The foregoing facilitative mechanisms were specific because E(2) replacement did alter maximal L-arginine/GHRH-induced GH secretion, indicating unchanged secretagogue efficacy. In conclusion, inasmuch as E(2) also attenuates inhibition of GH secretion by infused somatostatin and potentiates stimulation of GH secretion by GH-releasing peptide-2, we postulate that estrogenic steroids drive pulsatile GH production in part via mechanisms that include all three of GHRH, somatostatin, and putatively GH-releasing peptide/ghrelin signaling.