RESUMO
Nanosized titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a common component of sunscreen preparations and cosmetics as it reflects UV and visible light in accordance to Rayleigh's law. However, in aqueous environments, TiO2 is an efficient photocatalyst, producing superoxide O2â»· and hydroxyl (HO·) radicals, which are highly damaging to biomolecules. We investigated the role of TiO2 in promoting the peroxidation of linoleic acid (LA) alone and in the presence of hypochlorous acid (HOCl). TiO2 significantly enhanced peroxidation of LA, which was further enhanced in the presence of HOCl. This latter finding involved the formation of singlet molecular oxygen in a Russell-type mechanism appearing to involve preformed lipid hydroperoxides (LOOH). In addition to lipid peroxidation, HOCl also mediated formation of 18:1 monochlorohydrins, which in the presence of TiO2 appeared to decompose to kinetic products which supplemented peroxidation of linoleic acid. We present a theoretical mechanism which fits the available experimental data and may partially explain the dichotomy associated with HOCls role in lipid modification.
Assuntos
Ácido Hipocloroso/química , Ácido Linoleico/química , Peroxidação de Lipídeos , Nanopartículas/química , Titânio/química , CatáliseRESUMO
The burden of cancer is growing, and the disease is becoming a major economic expenditure for all developed countries. In 2008, the worldwide cost of cancer due to premature death and disability (not including direct medical costs) was estimated to be US$895 billion. This is not simply due to an increase in absolute numbers, but also the rate of increase of expenditure on cancer. What are the drivers and solutions to the so-called cancer-cost curve in developed countries? How are we going to afford to deliver high quality and equitable care? Here, expert opinion from health-care professionals, policy makers, and cancer survivors has been gathered to address the barriers and solutions to delivering affordable cancer care. Although many of the drivers and themes are specific to a particular field-eg, the huge development costs for cancer medicines-there is strong concordance running through each contribution. Several drivers of cost, such as over-use, rapid expansion, and shortening life cycles of cancer technologies (such as medicines and imaging modalities), and the lack of suitable clinical research and integrated health economic studies, have converged with more defensive medical practice, a less informed regulatory system, a lack of evidence-based sociopolitical debate, and a declining degree of fairness for all patients with cancer. Urgent solutions range from re-engineering of the macroeconomic basis of cancer costs (eg, value-based approaches to bend the cost curve and allow cost-saving technologies), greater education of policy makers, and an informed and transparent regulatory system. A radical shift in cancer policy is also required. Political toleration of unfairness in access to affordable cancer treatment is unacceptable. The cancer profession and industry should take responsibility and not accept a substandard evidence base and an ethos of very small benefit at whatever cost; rather, we need delivery of fair prices and real value from new technologies.
Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/terapia , Austrália , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Europa (Continente) , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Gastos em Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Based on data obtained from the system MoZMaD - PL (Polish Mother and Child Health Monitoring System); an equivalent of the American system PRAMS (Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System). The health behaviour of a pregnant woman, including adequate nutritional behaviours and supply of all the necessary nutrients, exert an effect on the health of a woman, development of the foetus, and the occurrence of diseases among the offspring at the age of maturity. The objective of the study was analysis of the nutritional behaviours among Polish pregnant women, with particular consideration of the recognition of dietary changes caused by the fact of becoming pregnant. The studies were based on questionnaire forms within the Polish Mother and Child Heath Monitoring System (MoZMaD - PL) implemented in Poland. The precise day of studies is appointed annually for the whole of Poland by the Chief Sanitary Inspector. The questionnaire forms were correctly completed in 2010 by 2,877 women. The replies to the questions were introduced by surveyors into the MoZMaD - PL system, a central database managed by the Institute of Agricultural Medicine. The results obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. More than a half of Polish women change their diet in pregnancy. According to the pregnant women examined, the changes in their diet consist in a more frequent consumption of white meat, fish, fruits and vegetables, as well as milk and dairy products. Favourable changes in diet were observed primarily among the respondents from the urban environment. Considering an insufficient awareness with respect to nutritional behaviours among females at reproductive age, the education of pregnant women and those who plan a pregnancy concerning an adequate diet should be jointly conducted by medical circles, schools, and the media, and directed primarily to women from the rural environment.
Assuntos
Comportamento Alimentar/fisiologia , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Estado Nutricional/fisiologia , População Rural , População Urbana , Peso Corporal , Coleta de Dados , Dieta , Suplementos Nutricionais , Ingestão de Energia , Feminino , Humanos , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição Materna , Polônia , Gravidez , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the lipido-sterolic extract of Serenoa repens, Permixon, to that of the a-blocker, tamsulosin, in the treatment of severe low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: In a 12-month, double-blind, randomized study that showed equivalent efficacy of Permixon 320 mg/day and tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day ("PERMAL study"), 685 BPH patients with IPSS > 10 had been analyzed for efficacy. Of these, the 124 patients with severe LUTS (IPSS > 19) at randomization were retained for this subset analysis. After a 4-week run-in period, 59 and 65 patients had been randomized to tamsulosin and Permixon groups, respectively. Both treatment groups were compared regarding the evolution from baseline of total IPSS and its irritative and obstructive subscores. LUTS-related QpL, prostate volume, Qmax and MSF-4 (sexual activity questionnaire) at different time points over 1 year An analysis of variance of changes from baseline to end point was performed for all the parameters. The over-time evolutions of total, irritative and obstructive IPSS were further compared using a variance analysis for repeated measurements. RESULTS: At 12 months, total IPSS decreased by 7.8 with Permixon and 5.8 with tamsulosin (p = 0.051); the irritative symptoms improved significantly more (p = 0.049) with Permixon (- 2.9 versus - 1.9 with tamsulosin). The superiority of Permixon in reducing irritative symptoms appeared as soon as month 3 and was maintained up to month 12 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Permixon 320 mg/day was shown to be slightly superior to tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day in reducing LUTS in severe BPH patients after 3 months and up to 12 months of treatment.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Serenoa , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , TansulosinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the lipido-sterolic extract of Serenoa repens, Permixon, to that of the alpha-blocker, tamsulosin, in the treatment of severe low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: In a 12-month, double-blind, randomized study that showed equivalent efficacy of Permixon 320 mg/day and tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day ("PERMAL study"), 685 BPH patients with IPSS > or =10 had been analyzed for efficacy. Of these, the 124 patients with severe LUTS (IPSS >19) at randomization were retained for this subset analysis. After a 4-week run-in period, 59 and 65 patients had been randomized to tamsulosin and Permixon groups, respectively. Both treatment groups were compared regarding the evolution from baseline of total IPSS and its irritative and obstructive subscores, LUTS-related QoL, prostate volume, Q(max) and MSF-4 (sexual activity questionnaire) at different time points over 1 year. An analysis of variance of changes from baseline to end point was performed for all the parameters. The over-time evolutions of total, irritative and obstructive IPSS were further compared using a variance analysis for repeated measurements. RESULTS: At 12 months, total IPSS decreased by 7.8 with Permixon and 5.8 with tamsulosin (p=0.051); the irritative symptoms improved significantly more (p=0.049) with Permixon (-2.9 versus -1.9 with tamsulosin). The superiority of Permixon in reducing irritative symptoms appeared as soon as month 3 and was maintained up to month 12 (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Permixon 320 mg/day was shown to be slightly superior to tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day in reducing LUTS in severe BPH patients after 3 months and up to 12 months of treatment.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Serenoa , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , TansulosinaRESUMO
The etiology of prostate cancer remains virtually unknown. Although there are a number of new leads with regard to risk factors for prostate cancer, more research is required to confirm them. There is little purpose in conducting further case-control studies of prostate cancer-particularly since the use of PSA testing has become wide-spread. Instead, future epidemiologic studies should focus on prostate tumor subclassification, in terms of method of detection, markers of biological "aggressiveness," and genetic changes. Many of these new leads involve the possible influence of polymorphisms in key genes involved in important physiologic processes in the prostate. To fully explore the complexity of interrelationships between the several elements in these pathways will require large cohort studies in which blood is sampled prior to diagnosis. Such studies will be important for identifying which modifiable aspects of lifestyle (such as diet, alcohol, tobacco, physical activity) might be targeted for intervention, to reduce risk. The detection of early prostate cancers by PSA testing relatives of men with prostate cancer has affected the prevalence of phenocopies and, hence, the meaningfulness of risk estimation in prostate cancer families. Because multiple-case families form the substrate for gene hunting via linkage analysis, this phenocopy phenomenon is going to cause considerable confusion and wasted effort. Presently, men with a family history of prostate cancer can be provided with little advice in terms of preventive action. It is likely that one or more genetic mutations associated with a high risk for prostate cancer will be identified in the near future. Even so, the risks probably will be similar to those for mutations in the first two breast cancer genes--informative for very few families. It is difficult to foresee, as and when high-risk mutation carriers are identified, what advice should be offered to them: prophylactic prostatectomies seem to have less attraction than do prophylactic mastectomies for women at high risk of breast cancer. This issue becomes more complex when considering counseling on the basis of a genetic profile involving many low-risk polymorphisms. Hopefully, such genetic screening should occur only after its efficacy has been established; when there is a better understanding of prostate biology, tumor heterogeneity, and prognosis; and when there are proven treatment or prevention options available. Prevention is held to be better than cure, and there are some potentially interesting chemopreventive agents that require careful trial before public health initiatives can be promoted. Potential candidates include vitamin E, selenium, zinc, and lycopene as dietary supplements. There are other agents that may be appropriate for pharmaceutical development, including inhibitors of COX-2 and IGF-1 activity. It is important that chemoprevention trials are followed-up for a sufficient period of time and that other endpoints also are captured, because the supplementation of diets with superphysiologic doses of individual micronutrients sometimes has caused unexpected and unwanted results--for example, an 18% increase in lung cancers observed in the beta-carotene arm of the ATBC trial.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Composição Corporal , Dieta , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Neoplasias da Próstata/etiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/prevenção & controle , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: While the lipidosterolic extract (LSESr) of Serenoa repens--Permixon--has been shown to have an equivalent efficacy to finasteride in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), to date, there has been no valid comparison of phytotherapy with alpha-blockers. The aim of this study was to assess the equivalent efficacy of Permixon and tamsulosin. METHODS: Eight hundred and eleven men with symptomatic BPH (international prostdate symptom score, I-PSS > or = 10) were recruited in 11 European countries for a 12-month, double-blind randomized trial. After a 4-week run-in period, 704 patients were randomly assigned to either tamsulosin 0.4 mg per day (N = 354) or Permixon 320 mg per day (N = 350). I-PSS, QoL and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) were evaluated at baseline and periodically for 1 year. Prostate volume and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were measured at selection and at endpoint. The endpoint analysis was performed on the per-protocol (PP) population of 542 patients (tamsulosin: N = 273; Permixon: N = 269). RESULTS: At 12 months, I-PSS decreased by 4.4 in each group and no differences were observed in either irritative or obstructive symptom improvements. The increase in Qmax was similar in both treatment groups (1.8 ml/s Permixon, 1.9 ml/s tamsulosin). PSA remained stable while prostate volume decreased slightly in the Permixon-treated patients. The two compounds were well tolerated, however, ejaculation disorders occurred more frequently in the tamsulosin group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that Permiwon and tamsulosin are equivalent in the medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with BPH, during and up to 12 months of therapy.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Fitoterapia , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análise , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Serenoa , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , TansulosinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: While the lipido-sterolic extract of Serenoa repens (LSESr)-Permixon((R))-has been shown to have an equivalent efficacy to finasteride in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), to date, there has been no valid comparison of phytotherapy with alpha-blockers. The aim of this study was to assess the equivalent efficacy of Permixon and tamsulosin. METHODS: Eight hundred and eleven men with symptomatic BPH (I-PSS> or =10) were recruited in 11 European countries for a 12-month, double-blind randomized trial. After a 4-week run-in period, 704 patients were randomly assigned to either tamsulosin 0.4mg/day (N=354) or Permixon 320mg/day (N=350). I-PSS, QoL and Q(max) were evaluated at baseline and periodically for 1 year. Prostate volume and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were measured at selection and at endpoint. The endpoint analysis was performed on the per-protocol population of 542 patients (tamsulosin: N=273; Permixon: N=269). RESULTS: At 12 months, I-PSS decreased by 4.4in each group and no differences were observed in either irritative or obstructive symptom improvements. The increase in Q(max) was similar in both treatment groups (1.8ml/s Permixon, 1.9ml/s tamsulosin). PSA remained stable while prostate volume decreased slightly in the Permixon-treated patients. The two compounds were well tolerated, however, ejaculation disorders occurred more frequently in the tamsulosin group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that Permixon and tamsulosin are equivalent in the medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with BPH, during and up to 12 months of therapy.