Effects of pigeon pea leaves and concentrate mixture on feed intake, milk yield, and composition of crossbred dairy cows fed native pasture hay.

Protein supplements are expensive and not easily accessible under small-scale livestock production systems in Ethiopia and other developing countries, which necessitates investigating the alternative protein sources for cost-effective livestock production. Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp) leaves (PPLs) are rich in protein and are well-suited for feeding small ruminants; however, the effect of inclusion of PPL in the concentrate mixture (CM) on the performance of dairy cows was not well documented. This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of supplementation of PPL and CM to native pasture hay-based rations on feed intake, milk yield and composition, and blood metabolites of crossbred dairy cows (Holstein × Zebu). A 4 × 4 Latin square design with three replications, balanced for carryover effects, was used for this study. The treatments included native pasture hay provided ad libitum as a basal diet, supplemented with a CM alone (T1), the inclusion of 10% of PPL in the CM (T2), 20% PPL in the CM (T3), or 30% PPL in the CM (T4). Supplements were isocaloric and isonitrogenous. Total DM intake (hay + supplement intake) was similar (P > 0.05) among treatments. Hay intake was greater (P = 0.05) for T1 and T2 than for T4, while supplement intake was the least for T1 (P < 0.05). The treatment groups T2, T3, and T4, where PPL was included, had similar (P > 0.05) supplement intake. Feed intake, milk yield and composition, feed conversion efficiency, body condition score, serum total protein, albumin, globulin, glucose, triglyceride, urea N, creatinine, and cholesterol were similar (P > 0.05) among treatments. The inclusion of up to 30% of PPL in the CM resulted in a comparable performance of crossbred dairy cows as supplementation with CM under the conditions of the current experiment. Therefore, further study is required to evaluate the effect of the inclusion of a higher level of PPL in the concentrate mixture on the performance of lactating crossbred dairy cows.

Dietary Zinc-Amino Acid Complex Does Not Affect Markers of Mammary Epithelial Integrity or Heat Stability of Milk in Mid-Lactating Cows.

Supplying dietary zinc in excess of traditional requirements has clear impacts on the gut epithelium, but little research has explored whether similar impacts on the mammary epithelium may occur. Our objective was to determine the effects of supplemental Zn sources, in excess of minimal requirements, on markers of mammary epithelial integrity in blood and in milk as well as the heat stability of milk in mid-lactation cows. Twelve multiparous Holstein cows (132 ± 21 days in milk and 51 ± 3 kg/day milk) were blocked according to milk yield and enrolled in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square experiment. Experimental periods were 21 days, with 17 days allowed for diet adaptation and 4 days for sampling. Treatment sequences were randomly assigned to animals and treatments were as follows: (1) 0.97 g Zn/day provided as ZnSO4 (34.5 mg supplemental Zn/kg diet DM; 30-ZS), (2) 1.64 g Zn/day provided as ZnSO4 (56.5 mg supplemental Zn/kg diet DM; 60-ZS), and (3) 0.55 g Zn/day provided as ZnSO4 plus 1.13 g Zn/day provided as a zinc-methionine complex (58.2 mg supplemental Zn/kg diet DM; 60-ZM). Treatments were administered once daily as an oral bolus containing all supplemental trace minerals. Rumen-bypass methionine was also included in the 30-ZS and 60-ZS boluses to provide metabolizable methionine equivalent to that provided in 60-ZM rations. Milk samples were assessed for electrolytes, somatic cell transcript abundance of genes related to zinc metabolism, and heat coagulation time. Whole blood samples were analyzed for Na and K concentrations, and plasma samples were analyzed for lactose concentration. Cows fed 60-ZS or 60-ZM had greater zinc intake compared to 30-ZS. Dry matter intake and milk fat content tended to be greater in 60-ZS and 60-ZM cows compared to 30-ZS. Somatic cell linear score was similar among treatments. Treatments neither affected markers of mammary epithelial integrity in blood nor in milk of cows, including plasma concentration of lactose, milk concentrations of Na+ and K+, and SLC30A2 and CLU transcript abundance. Treatments had no effect on milk N fractions or heat coagulation time. This study provided no evidence that supplemental Zn above the established requirements can improve blood-milk epithelial barrier or heat stability of milk in healthy mid-lactation dairy cows.

Choline Regulates the Function of Bovine Immune Cells and Alters the mRNA Abundance of Enzymes and Receptors Involved in Its Metabolism in vitro.

Dietary choline can impact systemic immunity, but it remains unclear whether this is primarily via direct impacts on immune cells or secondary effects of altered metabolic function. To determine whether increased choline concentrations (3.2, 8.2, 13.2 µM) in cell culture alter the function of bovine innate and adaptive immune cells, we isolated cells from dairy cows in early and mid-lactation as models of immuno-compromised and competent cells, respectively. Phagocytic and killing capacity of isolated neutrophils were linearly diminished with increasing doses of choline. In contrast, lymphocyte proliferation was linearly enhanced with increasing doses of choline. Furthermore, increasing doses of choline increased the mRNA abundance of genes involved in the synthesis of choline products (betaine, phosphatidylcholine, and acetylcholine) as well as muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in a quadratic and linear fashion for neutrophils and monocytes, respectively. Phagocytic and killing capacity of neutrophils and proliferation of lymphocytes were not affected by stage of lactation or its interaction with choline or LPS. In neutrophils from early lactation cows, choline linearly increased the mRNA abundance of muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptors, whereas choline-supplemented monocytes from mid-lactation cows linearly increased the mRNA abundance of several genes coding for choline metabolism enzymes. These data demonstrate that choline regulates the inflammatory response of immune cells and suggest that the mechanism may involve one or more of its metabolic products.

Managing complexity: Dealing with systemic crosstalk in bovine physiology.

Dairy producers rely heavily on advisors with deep expertise in nutrition, reproduction, and health. However, a shift is occurring, driven both by farm size and by advances in biology. Larger dairy businesses can investigate management options with a degree of precision never before possible; simultaneously, the lines between the metabolic, immune, and reproductive systems are becoming blurred. For example, new research has revealed a surprising role for immune cells in regulating metabolism and documented the nutrient requirements of the immune system. The gut epithelium has garnered new attention as a tissue that actively manages the commensal microbiome, entrains the responses of the neonatal immune system, and provides a barrier limiting movement of molecules from the gut lumen. New hormone discoveries have added adipose tissue, bone, and muscle to the list of endocrine organs. Finally, nutrients are now seen not only as substrates and cofactors, but also as signals that can alter cellular function. What does all of this mean for the dairy industry? Consultants are increasingly reaching across disciplinary boundaries to best support the physiology of the cow. However, research is needed to translate proof-of-principle findings into applications in cattle. Key unanswered questions include the degree to which roles of the hindgut in monogastrics translate to ruminants, and whether some host-microbe crosstalk also occurs in the rumen; whether hormone release by storage organs during a catabolic state affects reproductive function; and the degree to which immunostimulation by dietary signals enhances or disrupts health and productivity. It is critical to address these questions with multiple approaches. Mechanistic studies provide a nuanced understanding of signal interactions, but large-scale commercial studies are needed to evaluate effects on multiple production outcomes in the environment of interest, and meta-analyses best integrate findings into a cohesive understanding of responses to diet. Incorporating all aspects of animal health and productivity in management decisions will remain an art for the foreseeable future, but this should not dissuade the industry from pursuing a more holistic approach to management of the cow.