Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 2023 Nov 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37984767

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Low-dose CT (LDCT) is underused in Arkansas for lung cancer screening, a rural state with a high incidence of lung cancer. The objective was to determine whether offering free LDCT increased the number of high-risk individuals screened in a rural catchment area. METHODS: There were 5,402 patients enrolled in screening at Highlands Oncology, a community oncology clinic in Northwest Arkansas, from 2013 to 2020. Screenings were separated into time periods: period 1 (10 months for-fee), period 2 (10 months free with targeted advertisements and primary care outreach), and period 3 (62 months free with only primary care outreach). In all, 5,035 high-risk participants were eligible for analysis based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Enrollment rates, incidence densities (IDs), Cox proportional hazard models, and Kaplan-Meier curves were performed to investigate differences between enrollment periods and high-risk groups. RESULTS: Patient volume increased drastically once screenings were offered free of charge (period 1 = 4.6 versus period 2 = 66.0 and period 3 = 69.8 average patients per month). Incidence density per 1,000 person-years increased through each period (IDPeriod 1 = 17.2; IDPeriod 2 = 20.8; IDPeriod 3 = 25.5 cases). Cox models revealed significant differences in lung cancer risk between high-risk groups (P = .012) but not enrollment periods (P = .19). Kaplan-Meier lung cancer-free probabilities differed significantly between high-risk groups (log-rank P = .00068) but not enrollment periods (log-rank P = .18). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that eligible patients are more receptive to free LDCT screening, despite most insurances not having a required copay for eligible patients.

2.
J Affect Disord ; 260: 703-709, 2020 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31561113

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the empirical association between psychosocial protective factors and subsequent suicidal ideation in veterans. METHODS: We conducted a national longitudinal survey in which participants were randomly drawn from over one million U.S. military service members who served after September 11, 2001. Data were provided by a total of 1090 veterans representative of all 50 states and all military branches in two waves of data collection one year apart (79% retention rate). RESULTS: In chi-square analyses, psychosocial protective factors at wave 1 (employment, meeting basic needs, self-care, living stability, social support, spirituality, resilience, and self-determination) were significantly related to lower suicidal ideation at wave 2. In multivariable analyses controlling for covariates at wave 1 including suicidal ideation, the total number of protective factors endorsed at wave 1 significantly predicted reduced odds of suicidal ideation at wave 2. In multivariable analysis examining individual risk and protective factors, again controlling for covariates, results showed that money to cover basic needs and higher psychological resilience at wave 1 were associated with significantly lower odds of suicidal ideation at wave 2. LIMITATIONS: The study measured the link between psychosocial protective factors and suicidal ideation but not suicide attempts, which would be an important next step for this research. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that psychosocial rehabilitation and holistic approaches targeting financial well-being, homelessness, resilience, self-care, social support, spirituality, and work may offer a promising avenue in both veteran and non-veteran populations for treatment safety planning as well as suicide risk management and prevention.


Assuntos
Ideação Suicida , Veteranos/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Militares/psicologia , Fatores de Proteção , Resiliência Psicológica , Fatores de Risco , Espiritualidade , Violência/psicologia
3.
Psychophysiology ; 52(12): 1669-81, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26372120

RESUMO

Startle potentiation is a well-validated translational measure of negative affect. Startle potentiation is widely used in clinical and affective science, and there are multiple approaches for its quantification. The three most commonly used approaches quantify startle potentiation as the increase in startle response from a neutral to threat condition based on (1) raw potentiation, (2) standardized potentiation, or (3) percent-change potentiation. These three quantification approaches may yield qualitatively different conclusions about effects of independent variables (IVs) on affect when within- or between-group differences exist for startle response in the neutral condition. Accordingly, we directly compared these quantification approaches in a shock-threat task using four IVs known to influence startle response in the no-threat condition: probe intensity, time (i.e., habituation), alcohol administration, and individual differences in general startle reactivity measured at baseline. We confirmed the expected effects of time, alcohol, and general startle reactivity on affect using self-reported fear/anxiety as a criterion. The percent-change approach displayed apparent artifact across all four IVs, which raises substantial concerns about its validity. Both raw and standardized potentiation approaches were stable across probe intensity and time, which supports their validity. However, only raw potentiation displayed effects that were consistent with a priori specifications and/or the self-report criterion for the effects of alcohol and general startle reactivity. Supplemental analyses of reliability and validity for each approach provided additional evidence in support of raw potentiation.


Assuntos
Afeto/fisiologia , Piscadela/fisiologia , Individualidade , Reflexo de Sobressalto/fisiologia , Estimulação Acústica , Medo/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
4.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw ; 18(8): 480-5, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26252934

RESUMO

Research indicates that a small subset of those who routinely play video games show signs of pathological habits, with side effects ranging from mild (e.g., being late) to quite severe (e.g., losing a job). However, it is still not clear whether individual types, or genres, of games are most strongly associated with Internet gaming disorder (IGD). A sample of 4,744 University of Wisconsin-Madison undergraduates (Mage=18.9 years; SD=1.9 years; 60.5% female) completed questionnaires on general video game playing habits and on symptoms of IGD. Consistent with previous reports: 5.9-10.8% (depending on classification criteria) of individuals who played video games show signs of pathological play. Furthermore, real-time strategy and role-playing video games were more strongly associated with pathological play, compared with action and other games (e.g., phone games). The current investigation adds support to the idea that not all video games are equal. Instead, certain genres of video games, specifically real-time strategy and role-playing/fantasy games, are disproportionately associated with IGD symptoms.


Assuntos
Comportamento Aditivo/etiologia , Internet , Transtornos Mentais/etiologia , Jogos de Vídeo/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Probabilidade , Recreação , Desempenho de Papéis , Estudantes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Universidades , Jogos de Vídeo/psicologia , Jogos de Vídeo/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 74(8): e754-64, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24021516

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies of interventions that integrated medical and mental health care to improve general medical outcomes in individuals with serious mental illness. DATA SOURCES: English-language publications in MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library, from database inception through January 18, 2013, were searched using terms for our diagnoses of interest, a broad set of terms for care models, and a set of terms for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental design. Bibliographies of included articles were examined for additional sources. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched using the terms for our diagnoses of interest (serious mental illness,SMI,bipolar disorder,schizophrenia,orschizoaffective disorder) to assess for evidence of publication bias and ongoing studies. STUDY SELECTION: 4 RCTs were included from 1,729 articles reviewed. Inclusion criteria were RCT or quasi-experimental design; adult outpatient population with 25% or greater carrying a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder; intervention with a stated goal to improve medical outcomes through integration of care, using a comparator of usual care or other quality improvement strategy; and outcomes assessing process of care, clinical outcomes, or physical functioning. DATA EXTRACTION: A trained researcher abstracted the following data from the included articles: study design, funding source, setting, population characteristics, eligibility and exclusion criteria, number of subjects and providers, intervention(s), comparison(s), length of follow-up, and outcome(s). These abstracted data were then overread by a second reviewer. RESULTS: Of the 4 studies reviewed, 2 good-quality studies (according to the guidelines of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) that evaluated processes of preventive and chronic disease care demonstrated positive effects of integrated care. Specifically, integrated care interventions were associated with increased rates of immunization and screening. All 4 RCTs evaluated changes in physical functioning, with mixed results: 2 studies demonstrated small improvements in the physical health component of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and 2 studies demonstrated no significant difference in SF-36 scores. No studies reported on clinical outcomes related to preventive care or chronic medical care. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated care models have positive effects on processes of preventive and chronic disease care but have inconsistent effects on physical functioning for individuals with serious mental illness. The relatively small number of trials and limited range of treatment models tested and outcomes reported point to the need for additional study in this important area.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/terapia , Doença Crônica/terapia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/organização & administração , Transtornos Psicóticos/terapia , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Adulto , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Seguimentos , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA