Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 14(6): e0217636, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31216295

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For patients with diabetes, many with multiple complex chronic conditions, using a patient portal can support self-management and coordination of health care services, and may impact the frequency of in-person health care visits. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of portal access on the number of outpatient visits, emergency visits, and preventable hospitalizations. DESIGN: Observational study comparing patients' visit rates with and without portal access, using marginal structural modeling with inverse probability weighting estimates to account for potential bias due to confounding and attrition. SETTING: Large integrated delivery system which implemented a patient portal (2006-2007). PATIENTS: We examined 165,447 patients with diabetes defined using clinical registries. Our study included both patients with diabetes-only and patients with multiple complex chronic conditions (diabetes plus asthma, congestive artery disease, congestive heart failure, or hypertension). MEASUREMENTS: We examined rates of outpatient office visits, emergency room visits, and preventable hospitalizations (for ambulatory care sensitive conditions). RESULTS: Access to a patient portal was associated with significantly higher rates of outpatient office visits, in both patients with diabetes only and in patients with multiple complex conditions (p<0.05). In patients with multiple complex chronic conditions, portal use was also associated with significantly fewer emergency room visits (3.9 fewer per 1,000 patients per month, p<0.05) and preventable hospital stays (0.8 fewer per 1,000 patients per month, p<0.05). In patients with only diabetes, the results were directionally consistent but not statistically significantly associated with emergency room visits and preventable hospital stays. LIMITATIONS: Observational study in an integrated delivery system. CONCLUSION: Access to a patient portal can increase engagement in outpatient visits, potentially addressing unmet clinical needs, and reduce downstream health events that lead to emergency and hospital care, particularly among patients with multiple complex conditions.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial , Asma/complicações , Asma/patologia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Diabetes Mellitus/patologia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/patologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/patologia , Internet , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Portais do Paciente
2.
Am J Manag Care ; 24(1): 43-48, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29350505

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Some patients lack regular computer access and experience a digital divide that causes them to miss internet-based health innovations. The diffusion of smartphones has increased internet access across the socioeconomic spectrum, and increasing the channels through which patients can access their personal health records (PHRs) could help bridge the divide in PHR use. We examined PHR use through a computer-based Web browser or mobile device. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional historical cohort analysis. METHODS: Among adult patients in the diabetes registry of an integrated healthcare delivery system, we studied the devices used to access their PHR during 2016. RESULTS: Among 267,208 patients with diabetes, 68.1% used the PHR in 2016; 60.6% of all log-ins were via computer and 39.4% were via mobile device. Overall, 63.9% used it from both a computer and mobile device, 29.6% used only a computer, and 6.5% used only a mobile device. After adjustment, patients who were black, Hispanic, or Asian; lived in lower socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhoods; or had lower engagement were all significantly more likely to use the PHR only from a mobile device (P <.05). Patients using the PHR only via mobile device used it less frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile-ready PHRs may increase access among patients facing a digital divide in computer use, disproportionately reaching racial/ethnic minorities and lower SES patients. Nonetheless, even with a mobile-optimized and app-accessible PHR, differences in PHR use by race/ethnicity and SES remain. Continued efforts are needed to increase equitable access to PHRs among patients with chronic conditions.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros de Saúde Pessoal , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/métodos , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Internet/estatística & dados numéricos , Aplicativos Móveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Smartphone/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Povo Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Crônica , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA