Tall cell variant papillary thyroid carcinoma impacts disease-free survival at the 10 % cut-point on multivariate analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of tall cell variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (TCV-PTC) corresponds to the feature of "aggressive histology" within the framework of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) Risk of Recurrence (ROR) guidelines. Using the current World Health Organization (WHO) definition for TCV-PTC (tall cells with height at least twice the width, distribution ≥ 30 %), we examined the impact of this diagnosis on disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 347 patients treated for primary papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Current ATA guidelines were followed for the extent of surgery and the administration of adjuvant radioiodine therapy. Clinical surveillance included ultrasound examination and biochemical parameters according to ATA standards. The outcome was measured as time from surgery to first disease recurrence (DR) versus time from surgery until the last documented disease-free encounter (no evidence of disease, NED). Disease-free patients with fewer than 6 months of follow-up were excluded from this cohort. Structural recurrences are documented by histology or cytology whereas biochemical recurrences are documented by rising serum thyroglobulin in the absence of structural disease. All slides on all patients were examined by two pathologists with the substantial interobserver agreement (Kappa = 73 %). The primary tumors are categorically classified either as (1) TCV-PTC (definition above), (2) Papillary thyroid carcinoma with tall cell features (PTC-TCF) (≥ 10 % < 30 % tall cells), or (3) Control (< 10 % tall cells). Tumor size is categorized as either (1) ≤ 10 mm, (2) 11-29 mm, or (3) ≥ 30 mm. Degree of ETE is categorized as either intrathyroidal, microscopic ETE, histologic spread to strap muscles, or pT4 disease. RESULTS: 185 patients are classified as TCV-PTC (≥ 30 % tall cells), 62 as PTC-TCF (≥ 10 % < 30 % tall cells), and 100 as control group (< 10 % tall cells). TCV-PTC is associated with ≥ 30 mm size (p = .0246) and invasion of strap muscles and/or pT4 (p = .0325). There was no relationship between TCV-PTC and aggressive lymph node (ALN) status defined by ATA. Overall follow-up ranged from two months (one patient death) to 203 months (mean 40.8, median 33.0). DR occurred in 61 patients (mean 31.4 months, range 0 -184, 59 structural recurrences, 2 biochemical recurrences). Three models for TCV-PTC were examined: Model 1 - Tall cells ≥ 10% versus control, Model 2 - TCV-PTC versus TCF-PTC versus control, and Model 3 - TCV-PTC versus control. Kaplan Meier curves demonstrated decreased DFS with ALN status (p = .0001), ETE (p = .0295), and TCV-PTC (Model 1, p = .041). On multivariate analysis, TCV-PTC (Model 1) remained significantly predictive when adjusted for ALN (p = .0059). ETE dropped out of the model. CONCLUSION: TCV-PTC is significantly associated with larger tumors and a greater degree of ETE. The diagnosis of TCV-PTC significantly impacts DFS at the 10 % cut-point on multivariate analysis.

Through the Glass Brightly: Pathology Review in the Multidisciplinary Setting.

Hospital-centered academic surgical pathologists are essential members of multidisciplinary head and neck tumor boards. A working, multidisciplinary head and neck tumor board is composed of many dedicated professionals who contribute their individual pieces of patient data. This weekly congregation of head and neck specialists results in a special, concerted, and dynamic process of data integration into a holistic matrix view of the patients. Despite all the technological advances in communication, the fundamentals of human interactions still apply: there is no better substitute for a regular, working, multidisciplinary head and neck tumor board.