Ocular and cardiac artifact rejection for real-time analysis in MEG.

BACKGROUND: Recently, magnetoencephalography (MEG) based real-time brain computing interfaces (BCI) have been developed to enable novel and promising methods for neuroscience research. It is well known that artifact rejection prior to source localization largely enhances the localization accuracy. However, many BCI approaches neglect real-time artifact removal due to its time consuming process. NEW METHOD: The method (referred to as ocular and cardiac artifact rejection for real-time analysis, OCARTA) is based on constrained independent component analysis (cICA), where a priori information of the underlying source signals is used to optimize and accelerate signal decomposition. Thereby, prior information is incorporated by using the subject's individual cardiac and ocular activity. The algorithm automatically uses different separation strategies depending on the underlying source activity. RESULTS: OCARTA was tested and applied to data from three different but most commonly used MEG systems (4D-Neuroimaging, VSM MedTech Inc. and Elekta Neuromag). Ocular and cardiac artifacts were effectively reduced within one iteration at a time delay of 1ms performed on a standard PC (Intel Core i5-2410M). COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The artifact rejection results achieved with OCARTA are in line with the results reported for offline ICA-based artifact rejection methods. CONCLUSION: Due to the fast and subject-specific signal decomposition the new approach introduced here is capable of real-time ocular and cardiac artifact rejection.

Methods for pulse artefact reduction: experiences with EEG data recorded at 9.4 T static magnetic field.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of recording electroencephalography (EEG) at ultra-high static magnetic fields up to 9.4 T was recently demonstrated and is expected to be incorporated into functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies at 9.4 T. Correction of the pulse artefact (PA) is a significant challenge since its amplitude is proportional to the strength of the magnetic field in which EEG is recorded. NEW METHOD: We conducted a study in which different PA correction methods were applied to EEG data recorded inside a 9.4 T scanner in order to retrieve visual P100 and auditory P300 evoked potentials. We explored different PA reduction methods, including the optimal basis set (OBS) method as well as objective and subjective component rejection using independent component analysis (ICA). RESULTS: ICA followed by objective rejection of components is optimal for retrieving visual P100 and auditory P300 from EEG data recorded inside the scanner. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Previous studies suggest that OBS or OBS followed by ICA are optimal for retrieving evoked potentials at 3T. In our EEG data recorded at 9.4 T OBS performed alone was not fully optimal for the identification of evoked potentials. OBS followed by ICA was partially effective. CONCLUSIONS: In this study ICA has been shown to be an important tool for correcting the PA in EEG data recorded at 9.4 T, particularly when automated rejection of components is performed.