Development of an Interprofessional Education Experiential Learning Curriculum.

Today's healthcare system is facing many challenges, such as changes in the population, a shift from acute to chronic degenerative conditions, and disparities in access and outcomes. An integrative health approach, in combination with interprofessional collaborative practice, is viewed as an effective response to these changing demands. Curricular strategies must be developed and implemented that help prepare health professions students for these ongoing changes in the health delivery system. In this paper, we provide lessons learned from a 5-year interprofessional education (IPE) experiential learning curriculum for graduate physician assistant, physical therapy, and occupational therapy students and undergraduate nursing students. The program's experience suggests the need for common knowledge across disciplines, extensive faculty involvement, institutional support and flexibility, and ongoing community engagement. With these key elements in place, authors believe IPE learning can be successfully implemented with a wide range of graduate and undergraduate health professions disciplines and diverse community partners.

Visual control strategies of surgeons: a novel method of establishing the construct validity of a transurethral resection of the prostate surgical simulator.

OBJECTIVE: To examine novice and expert differences in visual control strategies while performing a virtual reality transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) task and to determine if these differences could provide a novel method for assessing construct validity of the simulator. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 11 novices (no TURP experience) and 7 experts (>200 TURPs) completed a virtual reality prostate resection task on the TURPsim (Simbionix USA Corp, Cleveland, OH) while wearing an eye tracker (ASL, Bedford, MA). Performance parameters and the surgeon's visual control strategy were measured and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Experts resected a greater percentage of prostate than novices (p < 0.01) and had less active diathermy time without tissue contact (p < 0.01). Experts adopted a target-locking visual strategy, employing fewer visual fixations (p < 0.05) with longer mean fixation duration (p < 0.005). With multiple learning trials, novices' performance improved and the adoption of a more expertlike gaze strategy was observed. CONCLUSION: Significant differences between experts and novices in both performance and visual control strategy were observed. The study of visual control strategies may be a useful adjunct, alongside measurements of motor performance, providing a novel method of assessing the construct validity of surgical simulators.

Developing and validating the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire bladder diary.

BACKGROUND: Despite the common use of urinary diaries to assess lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), a standardised validated diary does not exist. OBJECTIVE: To develop a validated urinary diary, using the psychometric validation protocol used in previous International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) modules. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We invited 400 consecutive patients attending the urology department for assessment of LUTS to complete a urinary diary (developed and validated for content in a previous study), and the ICIQ Male or Female LUTS questionnaire. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: To establish construct validity, the urinary diary was compared with known theories from published literature; to establish criterion validity, the diary was compared with questionnaire responses and/or urodynamic observations. Optimal diary duration was tested by comparing the 4-d diary against shorter durations. Patients completed a second diary after 2-3 wk for test-retest analysis, and a subset receiving sacral nerve stimulation completed the diary before and after treatment for analysis of responsiveness. A variety of statistical tests were used for different stages of the study. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The urinary diaries and ICIQ LUTS questionnaires were completed by 264 patients. Construct validity was established for two of three tested hypotheses. Criterion testing showed good agreement between questionnaire and diary recordings of nocturia (κ=0.653; p<0.001; 92.2%) and incontinence (κ=0.351; p<0.001; 64.5%), whereas good agreement (κ=0.378; p<0.001; 69.2%) was observed between urodynamically proven incontinence and diary reports (n=104). Diary recordings of urgency showed weak agreement with questionnaire responses (κ=-0.215; p<0.001; 36%) and urodynamic observations (κ=-0.105; p=0.256; 43.7%). The 3-d diary explained at least 94% of the total variance of the 4-d diary. A second diary for test-retest analysis was returned by 59 patients, demonstrating fair to excellent agreement (Spearman correlations: 0.49-0.88). Pre- and post-treatment analysis, on pilot testing, showed that the diary is responsive to change. CONCLUSIONS: Using the ICIQ psychometric validation methodology, a bladder diary was developed for the assessment of LUTS and shown to be valid, reliable, and responsive to change. The 3-d diary has been accepted as the ICIQ bladder diary. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, patients and clinicians developed and tested a diary in which patients can record their urinary symptoms. The resulting 3-d diary is called the ICIQ bladder diary and is available for adult men and women with urinary symptoms.

Assessing visual control during simulated and live operations: gathering evidence for the content validity of simulation using eye movement metrics.

BACKGROUND: Although virtual reality (VR) simulators serve an important role in the training and assessment of surgeons, they need to be evaluated for evidence of validity. Eye-tracking technology and measures of visual control have been used as an adjunct to the performance parameters produced by VR simulators to help in objectively establishing the construct validity (experts vs. novices) of VR simulators. However, determining the extent to which VR simulators represent the real procedure and environment (content validity) has largely been a subjective process undertaken by experienced surgeons. This study aimed to examine the content validity of a VR transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) simulator by comparing visual control metrics taken during simulated and real TURP procedures. METHODS: Eye-tracking data were collected from seven surgeons performing 14 simulated TURP operations and three surgeons performing 15 real TURP operations on live patients. The data were analyzed offline, and visual control metrics (number and duration of fixations, percentage of time the surgeons fixated on the screen) were calculated. RESULTS: The surgeons displayed more fixations of a shorter duration and spent less time fixating on the video monitor during the real TURP than during the simulated TURP. This could have been due to (1) the increased complexity of the operating room (OR) environment (2) the decreased quality of the image of the urethra and associated anatomy (compared with the VR simulator), or (3) the impairment of visual attentional control due to the increased levels of stress likely experienced in the OR. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the complexity of the environment surrounding VR simulators needs to be considered in the design of effective simulated training curricula. The study also provides support for the use of eye-tracking technology to assess the content validity of simulation and to examine psychomotor processes during live operations.

Face validity, construct validity and training benefits of a virtual reality TURP simulator.

OBJECTIVE: To assess face validity, construct validity and the training benefits of a virtual reality TURP simulator. METHOD: 11 novices (no TURP experience) and 7 experts (>200 TURP's) completed a virtual reality median lobe prostate resection task on the TURPsim™ (Simbionix USA Corp., Cleveland, OH). Performance indicators (percentage of prostate resected (PR), percentage of capsular resection (CR) and time diathermy loop active without tissue contact (TAWC) were recorded via the TURPsim™ and compared between novices and experts to assess construct validity. Verbal comments provided by experts following task completion were used to assess face validity. Repeated attempts of the task by the novices were analysed to assess the training benefits of the TURPsim™. RESULTS: Experts resected a significantly greater percentage of prostate per minute (p < 0.01) and had significantly less active diathermy time without tissue contact (p < 0.01) than novices. After practice, novices were able to perform the simulation more effectively, with significant improvement in all measured parameters. Improvement in performance was noted in novices following repetitive training, as evidenced by improved TAWC scores that were not significantly different from the expert group (p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: This study has established face and construct validity for the TURPsim™. The potential benefit in using this tool to train novices has also been demonstrated.

Incidence and factors predicting the detection of prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate for clinically benign disease.

INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is commonly performed as the surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms due to clinically benign disease. However, prostate cancer is not uncommonly diagnosed after such a procedure. We, therefore, determined in a retrospective study the incidence and factors that might predict the detection of prostate cancer after TURP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2005 and June 2007, a total of 476 men underwent TURP at our department. Of these, 411 men (86%) were thought to have benign disease and were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses using age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), urinary retention status, prostate resection weight, FBC and U&E were performed to determine whether prostate cancer could be predicted. RESULTS: A total of 47 men (11.4%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer [24/47 with pT1a (51%) and 23/47 with pT1b (49%)]. Furthermore, the Gleason scores ranged from 5 to 9. Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed that only age (mean: 76 years, range: 54-90 vs. mean: 71 years, range: 49-91 for prostate cancer and non-cancer cases, respectively) and serum PSA (mean: 14.9 ng/ml, range: 0.4-78.0 vs. mean: 7.4 ng/ml, range: 0.2-90.0 for prostate cancer cases and non-cancer cases, respectively) were able to distinguish between cancer and non-cancer cases. In addition, using multivariate logistic regression, age and serum PSA were also the only variables that separated the two groups with a ROC-AUC of 70%. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study has demonstrated that a substantial percentage of men are unexpectedly found to have prostate cancer after TURP. In addition, age and serum PSA were independent predictors of those who are likely to have prostate cancer.