ß-Lactam pharmacodynamics in Gram-negative bloodstream infections in the critically ill.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the ß-lactam exposure associated with positive clinical outcomes for Gram-negative blood stream infection (BSI) in critically ill patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pooled data of critically ill patients with mono-microbial Gram-negative BSI treated with ß-lactams were collected from two databases. Free minimum concentrations (fCmin) of aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, piperacillin (co-administered with tazobactam) and meropenem were interpreted in relation to the measured MIC for targeted bacteria (fCmin/MIC). A positive clinical outcome was defined as completion of the treatment course or de-escalation, without other change of antibiotic therapy, and with no additional antibiotics commenced within 48 h of cessation. Drug exposure breakpoints associated with positive clinical outcome were determined by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. RESULTS: Data from 98 patients were included. Meropenem (46.9%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (36.7%) were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. The most common pathogens were Escherichia coli (28.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.3%). In all patients, 87.8% and 71.4% achieved fCmin/MIC ≥1 and fCmin/MIC >5, respectively. Seventy-eight patients (79.6%) achieved positive clinical outcome. Two drug exposure breakpoints were identified: fCmin/MIC >1.3 for all ß-lactams (predicted difference in positive outcome 84.5% versus 15.5%, P < 0.05) and fCmin/MIC >4.95 for meropenem, aztreonam or ceftriaxone (predicted difference in positive outcome 97.7% versus 2.3%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A ß-lactam fCmin/MIC >1.3 was a significant predictor of a positive clinical outcome in critically ill patients with Gram-negative BSI and could be considered an antibiotic dosing target.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of ß-lactam antibiotics in the critically ill: direct measurement of unbound drug concentrations to achieve appropriate drug exposures.

Objectives: To describe the achievement of unbound ß-lactam antibiotic concentration targets in a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) programme in critically ill patients, and the factors associated with failure to achieve a target concentration. Patients and methods: Plasma samples and clinical data were obtained for analysis from a single centre prospectively. Unbound concentrations of ceftriaxone, cefazolin, meropenem, ampicillin, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin and piperacillin were directly measured using ultracentrifugation. Factors associated with the achievement of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets or negative clinical outcomes were evaluated with binomial logistic regression. Results: TDM data from 330 patients, and 369 infection episodes, were included. The range of doses administered was 99.4% ± 45.1% relative to a standard daily dose. Dose increases were indicated in 33.1% and 63.4% of cases to achieve PK/PD targets of 100% fT>MIC and 100% fT>4×MIC, respectively. Dose reduction was indicated in 17.3% of cases for an upper PK/PD threshold of 100% fT>10×MIC. Higher protein bound ß-lactams (ceftriaxone and benzylpenicillin) had better therapeutic target attainment (P < 0.01), but were prone to excessive dosing. Augmented renal clearance (calculated CLCR >130 mL/min) increased the odds of failure to achieve 100% fT>MIC and 100% fT>4×MIC (OR 2.47 and 3.05, respectively; P < 0.01). Conclusions: Measuring unbound concentrations of ß-lactams as part of a routine TDM programme is feasible and demonstrates that a large number of critically ill patients do not achieve predefined PK/PD targets. The clinical significance of this finding is unknown due to the lack of correlation between PK/PD findings and clinical outcomes.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactam antibiotics in burns patients--a one-year prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Beta-lactams are first-line antibiotics for the management of superficial infections due to burn injury. There is sparse data available on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients with burns in a ward setting. This study was conducted to evaluate the utility of a beta-lactam TDM program in a cohort of burn injury patients in a ward environment. METHODS: Steady-state blood samples were collected immediately before a scheduled dose. The therapeutic concentration targets assessed were (1) free antibiotic concentrations exceeding the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC; fT > MIC) and (2) free concentrations ≥4× MIC of the known or suspected pathogen (fT > 4× MIC). The duration of therapy was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included for TDM over a 12-month period. The mean (±SD) age was 49 ± 16 years. The mean percent total body surface area burn was 17 ± 13%. The mean serum creatinine concentration was 86 ± 20 µmole/L. Sixty percent of the patients did not achieve fT > MIC, and only 18% achieved the higher target of fT > 4× MIC. Although all the patients achieved a positive clinical outcome, the duration of antibiotic treatment was shorter in patients who achieved fT > MIC compared with those who did not (4.2 ± 1.1 versus 5.3 ± 2.3 days; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We found TDM to be a reliable intervention for burn injury patients in a ward environment. This study supports pharmacokinetic data that burns patients may be at risk of subtherapeutic dosing, which may prolong the duration of antibiotic therapy.