Irritable bowel syndrome: an update on therapeutic modalities.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common condition that a physician faces in the GI clinic. Of the general population, 10 - 25% suffer from symptoms judged to be IBS. The negative impact of this disease includes not only pain, suffering and direct medical expenses but also significant social and job-related consequences. IBS can be the result of dysfunction in any part of the brain-gut axis: alterations in the CNS caused by psychological or other factors, abnormal gastrointestinal motility, or heightened visceral sensations. Diagnosis is based on either the Manning or Rome-II criteria. Education, reassurance and emotional support are the cornerstones of successful treatment. The mainstays of the current therapeutic approach continue to be: stress management strategies, dietary modification entailing addition of dietary fibre and pharmacotherapy. Pharmacotherapy is still limited to treating symptoms. Newer drugs that modulate motility or drugs that modulate visceral sensation may be useful in selected cases. Psychopharmacological agents are useful in the treatment of IBS, especially in those with psychological co-morbidity. Alternative therapies such as homeopathy, acupuncture, special diets, herbal medication and several forms of psychological treatments and hypnotherapy are sought by many patients and are now being offered by physicians as treatment options, either alone or in conjunction with conventional forms of therapy in patients with refractory symptoms.

Optimization of sacral ventral root stimulation following SCI: two case reports with six-month follow-up.

Sacral ventral root stimulation in conjunction with sacral dorsal rhizotomy has been effective in promoting voiding in individuals with upper-motor-neuron spinal cord injury. We report on two patients who had variable voiding responses to stimulation during the first six months after electrode implantation. We used videourodynamic records and daily voiding records to characterize their voiding difficulties. Different methods were used to improve voiding, including seating adjustments and changes in stimulation parameters. The first patient was unable to empty his bladder on a regular basis with stimulation using 24 pulses per sec stimulating frequency for the first two months after implantation. Voiding was substantially improved by using 35 pulses per sec. At the end of six months, he is regularly emptying his bladder with stimulation and is on an every-second-day bowel program. However, his bowel program has been irregular. The second patient had very good voiding when stimulation was applied in bed, but he had poor voiding with high residual volumes when sitting in his wheelchair. Voiding was improved when he used a wheelchair cushion that was cut out in the back or lifted his buttocks off the chair. These procedures appeared to reduce perineal pressures. This patient has bowel care on alternate days and his bowel care time has been reduced following implantation of the device. Neither of the patients experienced an erection with the device. Both patients feel positive about their implant experience.

The effect of electrical stimulation on colonic transit following spinal cord injury in cats.

The effect of direct electrical stimulation on colinic transit and manometric recordings following spinal cord injury were assessed in five adult male cats. Intra-colonic catheters were surgically placed, stimulating electrodes were sutured to the colonic serosa and a laminectomy with spinal cord clamping at a T4 level was done to induce spinal cord injury (SCI). Twenty radiopaque markers were inserted through an intra-colonic catheter located 1 cm distal to the cecum and were monitored with daily fluoroscopy as a measure of colonic transit. Transit measurements were compared before SCI, after SCI and after SCI with electrical stimulation of 40 pps, 1 ms, and 0-50 mA. Colonic transit following SCI was significantly prolonged (P<0.05) when compared to the transit before SCI. Electrical stimulation following SCI improved colonic transit to values not significantly different from those before SCI. Spontaneous colonic phasic motor activity was similar both before and after SCI. Manometric defection patterns were also observed to be similar before SCI and after SCI with electrical stimulation. Based on our scoring criteria, the most frequent response to electrical stimulation was an abdominal contraction. These findings demonstrate that colonic transit is prolonged following SCI and that direct electrical stimulation of the colon following SCI improves colonic transit in an animal model.