Results in laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a multicentric experience.

OBJECTIVE: Renal transplantation is the most successful therapy to improve survival and quality of life for patients with end-stage renal disease. Living donors have been used as an alternative to reduce the stay on the waiting list. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy has become the standard procedure for renal transplantation. Minimally invasive surgery involves less postoperative pain with less analgesic requirements allowing shorter hospital stay for the donor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed demographic and intraoperative data and surgical complications for 46 patients who underwent laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy between March 2001 and March 2011. RESULTS: Mean donor age was 41 years. Mean operative time was 170 ± 45 minutes. The average cold ischemic time was 40 minutes and warm ischemic time was 26 minutes. Twenty-one patients were donors for pediatric receptors. Fourty patients underwent left laparoscopic nephrectomy, the other 6 patients underwent right laparoscopic nephrectomy due to vascular anatomic variant. Right laparoscopic nephrectomy was converted in 1 case (2.2%) due to renal vein laceration without donor morbidity and without compromise of graft function. Renal function at the second day post donor nephrectomy was measured using serum creatinine averaged 1.2 mg/dL with a mean increase of 0.4 mg/dL from baseline, with normalization after 30 days. No patient required blood transfusion, and there were no immediate surgical complications, infections, or mortality. One patient developed an incisional hernia in relation to the site of kidney removal. The mean hospital stay was 5 ± 1 days. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy in our experience is a safe technique without postoperative morbidity or mortality. It is associated with low levels of pain, early discharge and early return to physical activity and work, good sense of aesthetic results, and long-term graft function comparable to traditional nephrectomy and cadaveric grafts.

Living donor liver transplantation in pediatric patients with acute liver failure: safe and effective alternative.

UNLABELLED: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients with acute liver failure (ALF) is still controversial. To be considered a feasible alternative, this therapeutic option should offer similar results to transplants performed with cadaveric grafts, without significant risks for donors. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pediatric patients with ALF who were transplanted with either cadaveric or living donor grafts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1994 and February 2007, 149 patients under 18 years were transplanted, including 43 (28.8%) with ALF. We reviewed the demography, etiology, surgical technique, complications, and long-term results in this group. Patient actuarial survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The median age of the recipients was 4.8 years (range 1.2 to 18) including 26 boys and 17 girls. Sixteen (37.2%) underwent LDLT. Three patients in the living donor group needed a second graft (18.7%) versus 7 (26%) among the cadaveric group. No mortality or serious morbidity was observed in living donors. Fifteen patients died. Septic and neurologic complications, and primary graft non-function were the most frequent causes of death. All patients died during the first year after liver transplant. Actuarial 1- and 5-year survivals were 65% without a significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Considering that patients with ALF have no chance of survival without transplantation and that cadaveric grafts remain a limited resource, especially in our country, these results showed that LDLT was a valid option for these patients, as well as a secure procedure for the donors.