Challenging interpretation of germline TP53 variants based on the experience of a national comprehensive cancer centre.

TP53 variant interpretation is still challenging, especially in patients with attenuated Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). We investigated the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and LFS disease in the Hungarian population of cancer patients. By testing 893 patients with multiplex or familial cancer, we identified and functionally characterized novel splice variants of TP53 helping accurate variant classification. The differences among various semi-automated interpretation platforms without manual curation highlight the importance of focused interpretation as the automatic classification systems do not apply the TP53-specific criteria. The predicted frequency of the TP53 P/LP variants in Hungary is 0.3 per million which most likely underestimates the real prevalence. The higher detection rate of disease-causing variants in patients with attenuated LFS phenotype compared to the control population (OR 12.5; p < 0.0001) may raise the potential benefit of the TP53 genetic testing as part of the hereditary cancer panels of patients with multiple or familial cancer even when they do not meet Chompret criteria. Tumours developed at an earlier age in phenotypic LFS patients compared to the attenuated LFS patients which complicates genetic counselling as currently there are no different recommendations in surveillance protocols for LFS, phenotypic LFS, and attenuated LFS patients.

Co-option of Liver Vessels and Not Sprouting Angiogenesis Drives Acquired Sorafenib Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The anti-angiogenic Sorafenib is the only approved systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, acquired resistance limits its efficacy. An emerging theory to explain intrinsic resistance to other anti-angiogenic drugs is 'vessel co-option,' ie, the ability of tumors to hijack the existing vasculature in organs such as the lungs or liver, thus limiting the need for sprouting angiogenesis. Vessel co-option has not been evaluated as a potential mechanism for acquired resistance to anti-angiogenic agents. METHODS: To study sorafenib resistance mechanisms, we used an orthotopic human HCC model (n = 4-11 per group), where tumor cells are tagged with a secreted protein biomarker to monitor disease burden and response to therapy. Histopathology, vessel perfusion assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and miRNA sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were used to monitor changes in tumor biology. RESULTS: While sorafenib initially inhibited angiogenesis and stabilized tumor growth, no angiogenic 'rebound' effect was observed during development of resistance unless therapy was stopped. Instead, resistant tumors became more locally infiltrative, which facilitated extensive incorporation of liver parenchyma and the co-option of liver-associated vessels. Up to 75% (±10.9%) of total vessels were provided by vessel co-option in resistant tumors relative to 23.3% (±10.3%) in untreated controls. miRNA sequencing implicated pro-invasive signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal-like transition during resistance development while functional imaging further supported a shift from angiogenesis to vessel co-option. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first documentation of vessel co-option as a mechanism of acquired resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy and could have important implications including the potential therapeutic benefits of targeting vessel co-option in conjunction with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling.