Effects of a Mixture of Ivy Leaf Extract and Coptidis rhizome on Patients with Chronic Bronchitis and Bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Hederacoside C from ivy leaf dry extracts (HH) and berberine from Coptidis rhizome dry extracts (CR) can be combined (HHCR) as a herbal product. Previous studies have demonstrated that HHCR has antitussive and expectorant effects in animal models of respiratory disease. However, the therapeutic effects of HHCR on respiratory diseases in humans have not been well-studied. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the effectiveness of HHCR in patients with chronic bronchitis and bronchiectasis. METHODS: This was a multicenter (10 university teaching hospitals), open-label, prospective, single-arm, observational study. Consecutive patients with chronic bronchitis and bronchiectasis were included. Patients were orally treated with HHCR daily for 12 weeks. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores and bronchitis severity scores (BSS) were measured at baseline and at the end of the 12-week study. RESULTS: In total, 376 patients were enrolled, of which 304 were finally included in the study, including 236 males and 68 females with a median age of 69 years (range: 37-88 years). After 12 weeks of HHCR treatment, there was a significant improvement in SGRQ score (baseline, 32.52 ± 16.93 vs. end of study, 29.08 ± 15.16; p < 0.0001) and a significant reduction in BSS (baseline, 7.16 ± 2.63 vs. end of study, 4.72 ± 2.45; p < 0.0001). During the study, 14 patients concomitantly used an inhaled corticosteroid and 83 patients used an inhaled bronchodilator. HHCR also had significant positive effects on these patients in terms of SGRQ score and BSS. No serious adverse drug reactions occurred during HHCR treatment. CONCLUSIONS: treatment with HHCR improved the SGRQ score and BSS in patients with chronic bronchitis and bronchiectasis. HHCR may be a new therapeutic option for chronic bronchitis and bronchiectasis. Large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials are warranted.

Colistin monotherapy versus colistin/rifampicin combination therapy in pneumonia caused by colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to confirm the synergistic effect of colistin/rifampicin combination therapy compared with colistin monotherapy in pneumonia caused by colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CoRAB). The utility of the Etest was also assessed. METHODS: Nine subjects with pneumonia caused by CoRAB were enrolled from 20 July 2016 to 21 June 2018. Subjects were randomised to colistin/rifampicin combination therapy or colistin monotherapy. After exclusion of one patient who dropped out, the microbiological response (MR) and clinical response (CR) on Day 14 and mortality on Day 30 were assessed. Etest was conducted using CoRAB isolated at study enrolment. RESULTS: The MR rate in the colistin/rifampicin combination group (100.0%) was better than that in the colistin group (40.0%), however the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.196). The CR rate was not significantly different between the two groups. The MR (100.0%) and CR (100.0%) rates in subjects with 'partial synergy' as shown by Etest were higher than those (25.0% and 50.0%, respectively) in subjects with 'indifferent' results (i.e. no synergistic effect), however the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.143 and 0.429, respectively). Mortality occurred in two subjects with 'indifferent' results by Etest. CONCLUSIONS: Colistin/rifampicin combination therapy may have potential to achieve MR in pneumonia caused by CoRAB; however, achieving CR with this treatment is doubtful. 'Partial synergy' of colistin and rifampicin, as shown by Etest, may be a good prognostic factor [ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT03622918].

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected stage IB non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is being increasingly detected in the early stages, highlighting the importance of lung cancer screening. However, there is no consensus on the post-operative management of stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, this study aimed to identify the predictive factors for prognosis of stage IB NSCLC and determine the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence and survival. METHODS: We enrolled 89 patients with stage IB NSCLC who underwent complete resection surgery at Gangnam Severance Hospital from Jan 2008 to Dec 2014. As per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, patients were considered to be at high risk when they showed poorly differentiated tumors, lymphovascular invasion, tumor size >4 cm, and visceral pleural invasion (VPI). RESULTS: Among the 89 patients, 27 underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Young patients or patients with squamous cell lung cancer received adjuvant chemotherapy frequently. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not a significant factor for disease-free survival and overall survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not show a significant protective effect for survival, even for high-risk patients. However, VPI was a significant risk factor for disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR): 7.051; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.570-31.659; P=0.011] and overall survival (HR: 8.289; 95% CI: 1.036-66.307; P=0.046), even after adjustment for various factors. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy does not affect the prognosis of stage IB NSCLC, even in high-risk patients. Additionally, VPI is a strong prognostic factor of stage IB NSCLC.