RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Different treatments exist for Zenker diverticulum. We compared flexible endoscopic myotomy of the cricopharyngeal muscle, using a technique called the "window technique" in order to improve the field of view, to surgical approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were retrospectively included and divided into a gastrointestinal group, with flexible endoscopic myotomy, and an ear-nose-throat treatments group with either rigid endoscopic treatment, either cervicotomy. We evaluated effectiveness in terms of quality of life (on a scale on 0 to 10) safety and technical aspects of each procedure. RESULTS: A total 106 patients who underwent 128 interventions were included. Rigid endoscopic procedures were the shortest (p < 0.001), with no difference for adverse event. Endoscopic approaches, flexible and rigid ones, were associated with shorter time to intake resumption (1 and 3 days, respectively, vs 6 after cervicotomy) and shorter length of hospital stay (3 and 4 days, respectively, vs 7 after cervicotomy) (p = 0.001). Post-operative QoL was better after flexible endoscopy (9/10) and open cervicotomy (9/10) than after rigid endoscopy (7/10) (p = 0.004). Patients declared fewer residual symptoms after open cervicotomy (77% of low symptomatic patients) and flexible endoscopy (80%) than after rigid endoscopy (43%) (p = 0.003). Conversion to open surgery was more frequent during rigid than flexible endoscopies (18% vs 0%, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSION: Flexible endoscopic approach of Zenker diverticulum treatment seems to be safe and effective and may be an alternative to surgical approaches. Myotomy can be eventually helped by the window technique.
Assuntos
Miotomia , Divertículo de Zenker , Endoscopia , Esofagoscopia , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Divertículo de Zenker/cirurgiaRESUMO
Most head and neck cancers are associated with smoking and alcohol exposure. Smoking and alcohol cessation (ASC) is associated with improved quality of life, cancer therapy efficacy, decreased treatment-related and cardiovascular risks, and is expected to decrease the risk of second primary tumor. It is therefore a high priority in the plan of care. However, results of current ASC programs are disappointing and understanding the reasons of this is critical. We started a qualitative study in 6 academic centers including 3 university hospitals, one regional hospital and one comprehensive cancer center. We first interviewed surgeons and care givers involved in the management of head and neck cancers. Poor communication between stakeholders, absence of alignment of care goals between patients, surgeons and other caregivers, and low level of understanding by patients of the benefits of ASC were felt to represent frequent obstacles to successful outcome. More work is ongoing within the context of our IHNPACT umbrella protocol to identify hurdles associated with successful ASC.
Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/prevenção & controle , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Fumar Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Comunicação , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/etiologia , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Cirurgiões , Fumar Tabaco/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The combination platinum, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cetuximab is the standard first-line regimen of recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Due to the toxicity of this treatment, alternative therapies are often offered to patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall survival obtained with a first line chemotherapy adapted to patients functional status and the administration of all active drugs within successive lines of chemotherapy. METHODS: This series included a total of 194 patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC treated from 2006 to 2011 in a single institution where the administration of successive lines of chemotherapies has been the standard clinical approach. Treatment was administered according to clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: Most patients received at least two treatment lines. Only 11 patients (6%) were treated with a combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab in front line, but most patients received at least one platinum-based regimen (n = 154 patients, 78%); 162 (82%) received taxanes, 36 (18%) received 5-FU, 27 (14%) received capecitabine, 67 (34%) received methotrexate and 134 (68%) received cetuximab. The median overall survival was 9.8 months (95% CI: 8.1-11.4 months) and reached 13.1 months among the subgroup of 131 patients eligible for inclusion in a clinical trial. CONCLUSION: The survival outcomes of patients treated in the first-line setting with chemotherapy regimens adapted to their functional status, followed by several subsequent regimens were comparable with published outcomes of patients treated by platinum, 5-FU and cetuximab.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Metástase Neoplásica/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Cetuximab , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
The surgical technique of cochlear implantation is currently well established. It is sure and efficient. The results of the cochlear implant concerning speech perception are good and have a favorable cost/efficiency ratio. However, some points remain to be researched. Bilateral implantation allows one to obtain a binaural perception and especially to increase, theoretically, the possibilities of frequency discrimination by reducing interactions between electrodes and therefore improving the patient's performance. Nevertheless, it seems important to caution against placing two implants in one patient, especially for economic reasons. Thus, we have developed, with the MXM Company, a concept of a unique implant able to stimulate both cochleas with a single processor and a single receiver: the Binaural Digisonic cochlear implant. This article describes the Binaural Digisonic system, the surgical technique as developed by postmortem dissection, and the first two implantations in patients.