[Therapeutic strategy for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis proposed by an expert panel]. / Avis d'experts pour le traitement des uvéites non infectieuses.

Conventional immunosuppressive drugs, anti-TNF alpha and other biotherapies used in clinical practice are capable of controlling non-infectious anterior uveitis, posterior uveitis and panuveitis. The present work has been led by a multidisciplinary panel of experts, internists, rheumatologists and ophthalmologists and is based on a review of the literature. In case of corticodependency or sight-threatening disease, conventional immunosuppressive drugs (methotrexate, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil) and/or anti-TNF alpha (adalimumab, infliximab) are used to achieve and maintain remission. Interferon is an efficient immunomodulatory treatment, as a second-line therapy, for some therapeutic indications (refractory macular edema, Behçet's vascularitis). Other biologics, especially tocilizumab, are showing promising results. Local treatments (corticosteroids, sirolimus etc.) are adjuvant therapies in case of unilateral inflammatory relapse. Therapeutic response must be evaluated precisely by clinical examination and repeated complementary investigations (laser flare photometry, multimodal imaging, perimetry, electroretinography measures).

Biotherapies in large vessel vasculitis.

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu's arteritis (TA) are large vessel vasculitis (LVV) and aortic involvement is not uncommon in Behcet's disease (BD) and relapsing polychondritis (RP). Glucocorticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy in LVV. However, a significant proportion of patients have glucocorticoid dependance, serious side effects or refractory disease to steroids and other immunosuppressive treatments such as cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate. Recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis have resulted in the use of biological agents in patients with LVV. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α drugs seem effective in patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis and vascular BD but have failed to do so in giant cell arteritis. Preliminary reports on the use of the anti-IL6-receptor antibody (tocilizumab), in LVV have been encouraging. The development of new biologic targeted therapies will probably open a promising future for patients with LVV.

[Aortic inflammatory lesions in Behçet's disease]. / Atteintes aortiques inflammatoires associées à la maladie de Behçet.

The arterial lesions affect about 10% of patients with Behçet's disease (BD). Aortic inflammatory involvement includes predominantly aortic aneurysmal lesions affecting most often the abdominal aorta. They account for the severity of the disease and are a leading cause of death when they hit the aorta or pulmonary arteries. Within the arterial lesions of BD, aortic involvement is, with femoral lesions, the most common site involved (18-28% of patients with vascular disease). Unlike other large vessels vasculitis (i.e. giant cell arteritis and Takayasu's arteritis) diffuse aortitis is observed in less than 5% of patients with BD. Aortic lesions of BD may be asymptomatic (systematic imaging or occasionally associated with other vascular event) or be revealed by the occurrence of abdominal, thoracic or lumbar pain, or an aortic valve insufficiency. Fever is frequently associated. Increase in acute phase reactants is common in these patients. Histological analysis may show infiltration by lymphocytes, neutrophils and plasma cells in the media and adventitia and a proliferation of the vasa vasorum in the media as well as a fibroblastic proliferation. In the later phase, a fibrous thickening of the media and adventitia is observed as well as a proliferation and thickening of the vasa vasorum. The therapeutic management should always include a medical treatment for the control of inflammation (corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs and/or biotherapy) and often an endovascular or surgical treatment if the aneurysm is threatening. The choice between endovascular or surgical treatment is considered case by case, depending on the experience of the team, anatomical conditions and of the clinical presentation. In this review, we provide a detailed and updated review of the literature to describe the aortic inflammatory damage associated with Behçet's disease.

Management of osteoporosis of the oldest old.

UNLABELLED: This consensus article reviews the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in geriatric populations. Specifically, it reviews the risk assessment and intervention thresholds, the impact of nutritional deficiencies, fall prevention strategies, pharmacological treatments and their safety considerations, the risks of sub-optimal treatment adherence and strategies for its improvement. INTRODUCTION: This consensus article reviews the therapeutic strategies and management options for the treatment of osteoporosis of the oldest old. This vulnerable segment (persons over 80 years of age) stands to gain substantially from effective anti-osteoporosis treatment, but the under-prescription of these treatments is frequent. METHODS: This report is the result of an ESCEO (European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis) expert working group, which explores some of the reasons for this and presents the arguments to counter these beliefs. The risk assessment of older individuals is briefly reviewed along with the differences between some intervention guidelines. The current evidence on the impact of nutritional deficiencies (i.e. calcium, protein and vitamin D) is presented, as are strategies to prevent falls. One possible reason for the under-prescription of pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis in the oldest old is the perception that anti-fracture efficacy requires long-term treatment. However, a review of the data shows convincing anti-fracture efficacy already by 12 months. RESULTS: The safety profiles of these pharmacological agents are generally satisfactory in this patient segment provided a few precautions are followed. CONCLUSION: These patients should be considered for particular consultation/follow-up procedures in the effort to convince on the benefits of treatment and to allay fears of adverse drug reactions, since poor adherence is a major problem for the success of a strategy for osteoporosis and limits cost-effectiveness.

Biotherapies in inflammatory ocular disorders: Interferons, immunoglobulins, monoclonal antibodies.

Biotherapies used in clinical practice for the treatment of ophthalmologic manifestations of systemic diseases include interferons (IFN), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and monoclonal antibodies (anti-TNF, anakinra, tocilizumab and rituximab). Several open prospective studies have shown the effectiveness of IFN-α (78 to 98% complete remission) for the treatment of severe uveitis in Behcet's disease. IFN is capable of inducing prolonged remission and continued after his arrest, in 20-40% of patients. Side effects (flu-like, psychological effects) limit its use in practice. Anti-TNFα (infliximab and adalimumab) represents an attractive alternative therapeutic in severe uveitis refractory to immunosuppressants, especially in Behcet's disease. They are almost always (>90% of cases) and rapidly effective but their action is often suspensive. Anti-TNFα requires an extended prescription or takes over from another immunosuppressant once ocular inflammation has been controlled. IVIG are used for the treatment of Kawasaki disease and Birdshot disease. Several open or retrospective studies showed their effectiveness for the treatment of severe and refractory cicatricial pemphigoid. Tolerance of IVIG is good but their efficacy is transient. Rituximab showed an efficacy in few observations of various inflammatory eye diseases (uveitis, scleritis and idiopathic inflammatory pseudo-tumors or associated with granulomatosis with polyangiitis) and cicatricial pemphigoid. The risk of infection associated with this biotherapy limits its use in refractory diseases to conventional therapy. Anakinra (a soluble antagonist of IL-1R) showed interesting results in terms of efficiency in one small open study in Behcet's disease. Its safety profile is good and with a quick action that could be interesting for the treatment of severe uveitis.

[Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension by endothelin receptor antagonists in 2008]. / La prise en charge thérapeutique de l'hypertension artérielle pulmonaire par les antagonistes des récepteurs de l'endothéline en 2008.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease characterized by an elevation of pulmonary-artery pressure and pulmonary-vascular resistance, leading to right-ventricular failure and death. Conventional therapy for PAH may include anticoagulation, digoxin, diuretics, supplemental oxygen and less often calcium-channel blockers. Protaglandins and sildenafil improve exercise capacity and hemodynamics. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: Endothelin-1 (ET-1) has been recognized as a major mediator in the pathogenesis of PAH. ET-1 receptor antagonists have been recently developed. Selective ET(A) receptor antagonists, which preserve endothelial ET(B) receptor vasodilatory and clearance activity, may offer more benefit than nonselective ET(A) plus ET(B) antagonists. Two ET-1 receptor antagonists, orally active, can be used: bosentan (ET(A)/ET(B)=20) is nonselective and sitaxentan (ET(A)/ET(B)=6500) is highly selective. In short-term studies, these two treatments showed similar efficacy. In the Sitaxentan To Relieve ImpaireD Exercise-2X (STRIDE-2X) one-year trial, which compared the two treatments, sitaxentan caused less liver toxicity and showed trends to higher efficacy than bosentan. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS: Individualized treatment for PAH should take into account the type of PAH, the comorbidities (liver disease), treatment interactions, and long-term efficacy.

Deflazacort versus prednisone in patients with giant cell arteritis: effects on bone mass loss.

OBJECTIVE: To compare bone mass loss due to deflazacort versus prednisone in longterm treatment of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a randomized double blind comparative trial. METHODS: Seventy-four patients were included in a prospective multicenter study. Half received deflazacort (DFZ) and the other half prednisone (PR) for a minimum of 12 months. Calcium and vitamin D supplements were also provided to all subjects. Our intent was (1) to evaluate bone mineral density, using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, at baseline and comparatively at 3, 6, and 12 mo; vertebral fractures by Meunier score and size variations after 12 mo treatments were also analyzed; (2) to assess calcium/phosphate metabolism modifications in both groups at baseline and after 12 mo. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in terms of treatment efficacy. Patients taking PR were slightly older on average versus the DFZ group (74 vs 70 yrs). Bone mass loss between entry and month 12 was not statistically different in the PR group (-0.026 +/- 0.007 g/cm2) compared to the DFZ group (-0.03 +/- 0.005 g/cm2). No significant difference was found in Meunier score variations (0.77 and 1.18 in the PR and DFZ groups, respectively; p = 0.3), nor in vertebral size variations (-0.4 and -0.2 in the PR and DFZ groups, respectively; p = 0.4). There was no difference in calcium/phosphate metabolism evaluations at month 12. CONCLUSION: In older patients taking longterm glucocorticoids who are at risk of osteoporosis, deflazacort did not result in less bone loss than prednisone.

Potentiation of vitamin K antagonists by high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulants and pulse high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone are often administered concomitantly, but no data on potential interactions are available. OBJECTIVE: To assess possible potentiation of oral anticoagulation by high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital in Paris, France. PATIENTS: 10 consecutive patients concomitantly receiving methylprednisolone and oral anticoagulants (fluindione and acenocoumarol) and 5 consecutive controls receiving methylprednisolone alone. MEASUREMENTS: Serial determinations of the international normalized ratio (INR) and clotting factors during administration of pulse methylprednisolone. The total plasma fluindione concentration was determined in 3 patients. RESULTS: The mean INR was 2.75 (range, 2.02 to 3.81) at baseline and increased to 8.04 (range, 5.32 to 20.0) after methylprednisolone administration. Plasma fluindione concentrations and the INR increased after methylprednisolone administration. Methylprednisolone alone did not increase prothrombin time. CONCLUSIONS: The action of oral anticoagulants is potentiated by intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone. The INR should be monitored daily during concomitant administration of these medications.